UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.              )

Filed by the Registrantþ

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant¨

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨

Preliminary Proxy Statement

¨

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule14a-6(e)(2))

þ

Definitive Proxy Statement

¨

Definitive Additional Materials

¨

Soliciting Material Pursuant toSection 240.14a-12.

ALLEGHANY CORPORATION

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

      

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

þ

No fee required.

 

¨

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules14a-6(i)(1) and0-11.

 

 (1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

      

 

 (2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

      

 

 (3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

      

 

 (4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

      

 

 (5)

Total fee paid:

 

      

 

 

¨

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

¨

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 (1)

Amount Previously Paid:

 

      

 

 

 (2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

      

 

 

 (3)

Filing Party:

 

      

 

 

 (4)

Date Filed:

 

      

 


LOGOLOGO

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

  March 17, 201615, 2019

Alleghany Corporation (“Alleghany”) hereby gives notice that its 20162019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2016“2019 Annual Meeting”) will be held at The Penn Club, of New York, 30 West 44th Street, New York, New York, on Friday, April 22, 201626, 2019 at 10:00 a.m., local time, for the following purposes:

 

 1.

To elect twothree directors for terms expiring in 2019.2022.

 

 2.

To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2016.2019.

 

 3.

To hold an advisory,non-binding vote on executive compensation.

 

 4.

To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting, or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Holders of Alleghany common stock at the close of business on March 1, 20162019 are entitled to receive this Notice and vote for the election of directors and on each of the other matters set forth above at the 20162019 Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.

You are cordially invited to attend the 20162019 Annual Meeting. Representation of your shares at the 20162019 Annual Meeting is very important. Whether or not you plan to attend in person, we encourage you to vote your shares promptly by using the Internet or telephone, or by signing and returning the enclosed proxy card in the envelope provided. You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the 20162019 Annual Meeting by written notice to the Secretary of Alleghany, by submitting a new proxy with a later date, or by voting in person at the 20162019 Annual Meeting.

 

By order of the Board of Directors,
CHRISTOPHER K. DALRYMPLE

Senior Vice President, General

Counsel and Secretary

Alleghany Corporation

7 Times Square Tower1411 Broadway, 34th Floor

New York, New York 1003610018

Important Notice Regarding Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for the Alleghany Corporation 20162019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on April 22, 2016:26, 2019: Proxy materials relating to the 20162019 Annual Meeting (notice of meeting, proxy statement, proxy and 20152018 Annual Report to Stockholders onForm 10-K) are also available on the Internet at www.envisionreports.com/www.edocumentview.com/YAL.


Dear Alleghany Stockholder:

Thank you for your continued ownership and support of Alleghany Corporation. On behalf of Alleghany’s Board of Directors, it is my pleasure to invite you to join us at the upcoming Annual Meeting of Stockholders. If you are unable to make the Annual Meeting, I encourage you to cast your vote on the items discussed in the Proxy Statement using the attached proxy card or by voting via telephone or online as detailed in the Proxy Statement.

In 2019, Alleghany Corporation marks the 90th anniversary of its founding. The values that were instilled in this company by earlier generations continue to drive our success today. We believe that our culture is a competitive advantage and a key differentiator when recruiting, attracting acquisition candidates, and growing our business.

Our Board of Directors is comprised of a group of committed and highly qualified individuals who care deeply about our company and bring a diverse set of experiences and perspectives to our Board deliberations. Our directors’ skills and independent thought leadership have been invaluable to me and the management team in establishing our long-term business strategy and executing on that strategy. Appearing for the first time as a director candidate in the Proxy Statement is Lauren Tyler, who was appointed to the Board in January of this year. We are pleased that Lauren has joined the Board, bringing strategic, operational, and leadership capabilities which are only partly covered in the Proxy Statement. We encourage you to vote for her and the other directors on the ballot, as well as the other proposals, at the upcoming Annual Meeting.

As we think about the past year and where we will take the company into the future, we remain committed to ensuring that pay is aligned with performance and the interests of our long-term stockholders. The Compensation Committee letter to stockholders on pages 39 and 40 provides more detailed perspective on this front. The Alleghany Board and management team are focused on creating long-term value for our stockholders, and our governance, strategy and management compensation are designed with this focus in mind.

On behalf of Alleghany’s Board and management, we look forward to seeing you at the upcoming 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The attached Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement will serve as your guide to the business to be conducted at the meeting this year. Please participate in Alleghany’s future by casting your vote on the items discussed in the Proxy Statement whether in person or through the other voting options that are described.

Sincerely,

Jefferson W. Kirby

Chairman of the Board


PROXY STATEMENT — TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

  1

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT ALLEGHANY’S 20162019 ANNUAL MEETING

  89

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

12

Board of Directors

12

Director Independence

12

Committees of the Board of Directors

  13

Board TenureComposition

  1513

Board LeadershipDirector Independence

  1514

Board Leadership

14

Board Meetings

14

Board Evaluation

14

Chief Executive Officer and Senior Management Succession Planning

  15

Board Evaluation

16

Board Role in Risk Oversight

  15

Committees of the Board

  16

DirectorsDirectors’ Nominations and Qualifications

  1618

Communications with Directors

  1719

Stockholder Engagement

19

Director Retirement Policy

  1719

Codes of Ethics

  1720

Majority Election of Directors

  1720

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

  1820

Hedging and Pledging Policies

  1820

Related Party Transactions

  1821

PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

  2022

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

  2123

SECURITIES OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

  2224

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

  2426

PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

  2527

Nominees for Election

  2628

Other Alleghany Directors

  2729

Compensation of Directors

  3031

PROPOSAL 2. RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL 20162019

  3233

Audit Committee Report

  3335

PROPOSAL 3. ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

  3436

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

  3537

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

37

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

37

2015 Compensation Program Summary

  39

2018 Compensation Program Summary

  43

Alleghany Performance in 20152018

  4045

Alleghany Long-Term Performance

  4145

Compensation Committee Process

  4348

Elements of 20152018 Compensation

  4549

Financial Statement Restatements

  5257

Hedging and Pledging Policies

  5257

Executive Officer Stock Ownership Guidelines

  5257

Tax Considerations

  5257

Compensation Policies and Practices Relating to Risk Management

  5358

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

  5459

Summary Compensation Table

  5459

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 20152018

  5761

Narrative Discussion Relating to the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

  5862

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20152018 FiscalYear-End

  64


62

20152018 Stock Vested

  6365

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

63

Pension Benefits

  65

Pension Benefits

  67

Payments Upon Termination of Employment

  6769

CEO Pay Ratio

71

STOCKHOLDER NOMINATIONS AND PROPOSALS

  7073

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

  7174


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

This summary highlights selected information that is discussed in more detail elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. This summary does not contain all of the information you should consider, and you should read the full Proxy Statement before voting. Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Proxy Statement to “Alleghany,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us” refer to Alleghany Corporation, references to the “Board” refer to our Board of Directors, references to the “common stock” refer to our common stock, par value $1.00 per share, and references to the “2016“2019 Annual Meeting” refer to our 20162019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and any and all adjournments or postponements thereof.

20162019 ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION

 

Date and Time

  Friday, April 22, 2016,26, 2019 at 10:00 a.m., local time

Location

  

The Penn Club of New York

30 West 44th44th Street

New York, New York

Record Date

  March 1, 20162019

Mailing Date

  On or about March 17, 201615, 2019

MEETING AGENDA AND BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS

 

  Voting Matter Board’s Recommendation 

Additional

Information

  Proposal 1: Election of Directors

 FOR each director nominee   pages 25 to 3127 - 32

  Proposal 2: Selection of Independent Accounting Firm

 FOR pages 3233 and 3334 

  Proposal 3: Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

 FOR

 pages 34 to 6936 - 72

HOW TO VOTE (pages 8 and 9)9 - 11)

You can vote by any of the following methods:

 

By Internet

  Go to the voting website, www.envisionreports.com/YAL

By Telephone

  If you reside in the United States, Canada or U.S. territories, call toll free1-800-652-VOTE (8683)

By Mail

  If you received a proxy card in the mail, complete, sign, date, and mail the proxy card in the return envelope provided to you

In person

  Attend the 2019 Annual Meeting and vote by ballot

If you vote byusing the Internet or telephone, you must vote no later than 1:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on April 22, 2016.

26, 2019.

 

-1-


BOARD NOMINEES (page 26)28)

 

Karen Brenner

Age 63

Director since 2009

Chair of the Nominating and

    Governance Committee

Member of the Audit
Committee

  

LOGO

  

Ms. Brenner has been an Executive Director of Law and Business Initiatives at New York University since 2012 and Clinical Professor of Business at the Leonard N. Stern School of Business at New York University since 2008. She teaches professional responsibility in law and business, corporate governance in law and business, and corporate transformation and leadership.

Ms. Brenner’s qualifications to serve on the Board also include her years of business experience as Chairman/Chief Executive Officer and/or a board member of public and private companies in a wide variety of industries, and as an advisor to private equity firms, venture capital companies, boards of directors and chief executive officers focusing on enhancing the value of operating companies.

John G. Foos

Age 69

Director since 2012

Member of the Audit

    Committee

Member of the Nominating

    and Governance Committee

LOGO  

LOGO

Mr. Foos was Chief Financial Officer of Independence Blue Cross, a health insurance company, from 1989 until his retirement in November 2008. In addition, Mr. Foos currently serves as a director of Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina, a South Carolina-owned and operated health insurance carrier, the HAI Group Companies, a provider of niche insurance programs and services for the public and affordable housing community, and Emerald Shelter Group, anot-for-profit that provides healthcare and affordable housing. Mr. Foos was a director of Transatlantic Holdings, Inc., or “TransRe,” prior to March 6, 2012.

Mr. Foos’s qualifications to serve on the Board also include his extensive experience in and knowledge of accounting and finance, which includes service as the Chief Financial Officer of Independence Blue Cross, in addition to his prior experience as a Partner with KPMG LLP and his financial literacy.

Lauren M. Tyler

Age 57

Director since 2019

LOGO

Ms. Tyler has been Head of Human Resources at J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Asset & Wealth Management, or “J.P. Morgan,” overseeing all aspects of human resources, since 2015. Prior to that, Ms. Tyler was Global Chief Auditor for J.P. Morgan from 2012 to 2015 and Head of Investor Relations from 2009 to 2012.

Ms. Tyler’s qualifications to serve on the Board also include her over 30 years of business experience in banking, finance, and accounting, her experience in private equity and service as a Board member of private companies, and her financial expertise.

-2-


GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTSSUMMARY

 

Board Independence

  NineEight of our tennine directors are independent directors. All of our standing Board committees are chaired by independent directors. Our Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Governance Committeescommittees are 100 percent100% independent.

Board Structure

  Our Board is divided into three separate classes of directors. At each Annual Meeting of Stockholders, one class of directors is elected to a term of three years.

Risk Oversight

  Our Board and its committees work with management to diligently monitor and manage risk.

Independent Chairman

  Our current Chairman is an independent director. Our policy is that the Chairman should not be an Alleghany officer.
Board and Committee Evaluations  Our annual Board and committee evaluation processes help promote the effectiveness of the Board and its committees.

Director Tenure

  Our Board has an average tenure of tenapproximately 11 years, with over half of our current directors joining the Board in 2009 or later, andone-third joining the Board in 2012 or later.
Stock Ownership
Guidelines
  Executive officers are required to hold shares of common stock valued at three to five times their base salary (varies depending on position). Directors are required to hold common stock and/or restricted stock units valued at least five times the annual board retainer within five years of election to the Board. We have a policy prohibiting hedging and pledging of our common stockAlleghany securities by directorsexecutive officers and executive officersdirectors to discourage excessive risk-taking.

 

-2--3-


PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTSSUMMARY

2015A summary of 2018 and long-term financial results highlights are as follows:

2015Alleghany Performance in 2018

 

4.4% increase inCommon stockholders’ equity per share was $527.75 as of December 31, 2018, a decrease of 4.6% from common stockholders’ equity per share as of December 31, 2017. Adding back the March 2018 $10.00 per share special dividend to $486.02 at 2015 year-end from $465.51 at 2014 year-end.

Transatlantic Holdings, Inc., or “TransRe,” and RSUI Group, Inc. or “RSUI,” which together account for 90% of our consolidated2018 common stockholders’ equity produced high single-digit returns on equity on an operating basis (excluding net realized capital gains or losses and other-than-temporary impairment charges). Investment returns, however, were weakper share results in 2015 resulting in slightly lower growth in book valuea decrease of 2.8% for each company relative to the return on equity, consistent with the lackluster performance of all investment classes generally in 2015.full year.

 

Net earnings of $560.3$39.5 million in 2015,2018, compared with $679.2$90.1 million in 2014,2017, primarily reflecting higher other-than-temporary impairment lossesa lower income tax benefit in 20152018 compared with 2014.2017.

 

Consolidated Alleghany underwriting profit of $466.6 million in 2015,Earnings per diluted share and operating earnings per diluted share were $2.62 and $16.13, respectively, for the year-ended December 31, 2018, compared with $494.8 million in 2014,earnings per diluted share and a consolidated combined ratiooperating earnings per diluted share of 89.0% in 2015, compared with 88.8% in 2014, reflecting continued positive underwriting results at TransRe$5.85 and RSUI.$2.87, respectively, for the year-ended December 31, 2017.

 

Alleghany made progressA consolidated net pre-tax underwriting loss of $161.5 million in building2018, compared with a net pre-tax underwriting loss of $316.4 million in 2017. The 2018 underwriting loss included current year pre-tax catastrophe losses of $657.7 million, compared with $818.1 million of current year pre-tax catastrophe losses in 2017.

Outperformance by Alleghany’s equity and fixed income portfolios of their investment benchmarks.

A 77.1% increase in noninsurance revenue increased for the year-ended December 31, 2018, with record earning and double-digit return on invested capital at Alleghany Capital Corporation’s portfolioCorporation, or “Alleghany Capital.”

Completion by Alleghany Capital of non-financial business investments by acquiring IPS-Integrated Project Services,its acquisition of Concord Hospitality Enterprises Company, LLC, or “IPS.“Concord, along with strengthening of other Alleghany platform companies through several, complementary, bolt-on acquisitions.

Additional information regarding Alleghany’s 20152018 results, including audited consolidated financial statements, as well as Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, or “MD&A,” with respect to 20152018 results, is contained in Alleghany’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year endedyear-ended December 31, 2015,2018, or the “Form10-K,” which was filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or the “SEC,” on February 23, 2016.20, 2019. Readers are urged to review the Form10-K for a more complete discussion of Alleghany’s financial performance.

Alleghany Long-Term Performance

We believe that Alleghany’s performance is best measured over the long term, and that long-term growth in common stockholders’ equity per share is the best metric for evaluating such performance. In this regard, the table below shows the annual, and three- andten-year average rolling, annualized growth in our common stockholders’ equity per share, adjusted for a 2018 cash dividend and historical stock dividends, during the five-year period from December 31, 20102013 to December 31, 2015:2018:

 

   Common
Stockholders’
Equity
Per  Share($)(1)
   Annual
Growth
       
      Rolling Annualized Average 

Year

     Three-Year  Ten-Year 

2010

   325.31     10.4    5.0    8.7  

2011

   342.12     5.2    8.6    7.7  

2012

   379.13     10.8    8.7    8.8  

2013

   412.96     8.9    8.3    8.5  

2014

   465.51     12.7    10.8    8.6  

2015

   486.02     4.4    8.6    8.6  

Average

     8.7  8.3  8.5

(1)Adjusted for subsequent stock dividends

   Common
Stockholders’
Equity
Per Share($)
   Annual
Return(%)
         
   Rolling Annualized Average(%) 

Year

  Three-Year   Ten-Year 

2013

   412.96    8.9    8.3    8.5 

2014

   465.51    12.7    10.8    8.6 

2015

   486.02    4.4    8.6    8.6 

2016

   515.24    6.0    7.7    7.8 

2017

   553.20    7.4    5.9    7.0 

2018

   527.75    (2.8   3.4    7.2 

Average

     6.1    7.5    8.0 

 

-3--4-


As can be seen in the table above, Alleghany’s common stockholders’ equity per share has compounded over the various time metricsthree- andten-year periods in the mid-rangerange of Alleghany’s stated financialstrategic objective of7-10% annual growth in common stockholders’ equity per share.share, although it trailed that objective in 2018 and the three-year periods ending in 2017 and 2018 primarily due to a decline in the market value of Alleghany’s equity portfolio in December 2018 and significant catastrophe losses in 2017 and 2018.

The chart below summarizes Alleghany’s common stockholders’ equity per share growth and stock price performance over theten-year period from December 31, 20052008 to December 31, 2015,2018, compared with the Standard & Poor’sS&P 500 Stock Index, or the “S&P 500,” with all values indexed to December 31, 2005.2008. During thisten-year period, Alleghany’s common stockholders’ equity per share increased at a compound annual rate of 8.6%7.2% (adjusted for dividends), compared with a compound annual rate of return of 7.3%13.1% for the S&P 500, and the price of Alleghany common stock (adjusted for stock dividends) appreciated at a 6.6%9.1% compound annual rate of return.

 

 

LOGOLOGO

As indicated by the data presented in the chart above, Alleghany’s growth in common stockholders’ equity per share has been relatively consistent.consistent, with the exception of 2018 when it was negatively impacted by a decline in the market value of Alleghany’s equity portfolio and significant catastrophe losses. The trading price of Alleghany’s common stock has been more volatile, reflecting the volatility of the stock market in general. In Alleghany’s view, growth in common stockholders’ equity per share is a better measure of fundamental performance and value creation as compared to the more volatile trading price of Alleghany’s common stock. As such, Alleghany focuses its executive compensation incentive program on building common stockholders’ equity per share over time. As is shown in the chart, Alleghany’s growth in common stockholders’ equity per share has exceeded that of the S&P 500 return over the past ten years and is considerably less volatile.

COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

Compensation PhilosophySUMMARY

Our executive compensation program is intended to provide competitive total compensation to each of Alleghany’s executive officers (as listed on page 21)23), or the “Named Executive Officers,” that is aligned with the interests of our stockholders in increasing our common stockholders’ equity per share at rates of7-10% over the long term without employing excessive amounts of financial leverage and without taking imprudent risks. This approach enables us to manage risk to avoid loss of capital during periods of economic turmoil, which we believe creates maximum value for stockholders in the long term, even if it results in lower levels of capital appreciation during periods when economic conditions are more favorable.

-5-


2018 Named Executive Officer Compensation

Set forth below is the 2018 compensation for each Named Executive Officer as determined under SEC rules. See the 2018 Summary Compensation Table and the accompanying notes to the table beginning on page 59 for more information.

Name and Principal Position

 Salary  Bonus  Stock
Awards
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
  Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
  All Other
Compensation
  
Total
 

Weston M. Hicks

 $1,030,000  $  $4,767,823  $2,163,000  $  $168,529  $8,129,352 

President and chief executive officer

       

Joseph P. Brandon

  875,000      2,828,591   1,750,000      140,858   5,594,449 

Executive Vice President

       

Christopher K. Dalrymple

  690,000      1,114,654   690,000      109,719   2,604,373 

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

       

John L. Sennott, Jr.

  690,000      1,114,654   690,000      110,224   2,604,878 

Senior Vice President and chief financial officer

       

Elements of 2018 Compensation

The principal elements of compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers and the percentage that these elements represent of the 2018 compensation for our chief executive officer and our other Named Executive Officers are reflected below.

 

-4-


LOGO

For 2015, this compensation philosophy was evidenced by the following compensation highlights:With respect to such components of 2018 compensation:

 

CEO total direct compensation (salary, annual cash incentive and long-term equity basedequity-based awards) was $6.7approximately $8.0 million, representing approximately 0.9%0.2% of 2015 pre-tax earnings and approximately 0.1% of 20152018 revenues, and total direct compensation for our Named Executive Officers as a group was $17.1approximately $18.4 million, representing approximately 2.4% of 2015 pre-tax earnings and approximately 0.4% of 20152018 revenues.

 

85%87.1% of Mr. Hicks’s 2018 total direct compensation for 2015 was linked to performance, while performance-linked compensation for our other Named Executive Officers averaged 74%78.4% of total direct compensation in 2015.2018.

 

-6-


Mr. Hicks’s 20152018 total direct compensation decreased by 10%increased 4.2% from 20142017 total direct compensation, mostly due to a lower annualhigher target long-term incentive payout for 2015.award in 2018.

 

Annual incentive plan awards included a financial objective but also discretion given the nature of Alleghany’s business and long-term approach, with the discretionary aspect being restricted by the fact that payouts for 20152018 were limited to the lesser of (i) approximately $5.7$6.2 million (representing the maximum potential payout for our Named Executive Officers as a group) orand (ii) 3% of 20152018 annual adjustedpre-tax earnings, if less than $5.7 million. earnings.

 

Long-term performance share awards were subject to goals that we believed wouldto be challenging to meet in today’s low interest rate and volatile market environment and that are aligned with our corporate financial objective of long-term growth in book value, with no payout being made if threshold performance is not achieved, and with our CEO’s 2018 long-term incentives based 100% on performance. No payouts for the performance share awards for the award period January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2018 were made in February 2019 as threshold performance was not achieved.

Elements of 2015 Compensation

The principal elements of compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers in respect of 2015 consisted of:

salaries;

annual cash incentive compensation under the 2010 Management Incentive Plan, or “2010 MIP;”

annual grants of long-term equity-based incentives under the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan, or “2012 LTIP;” and

an annual savings benefit equal to 15% of base salary.

In addition, our Named Executive Officers receive a benefit, assuming the completion of five years of service with Alleghany or a subsidiary of Alleghany, under a retirement plan, although such benefit was frozen in 2013.

The percentage that these elements represent of the 2015 compensation for our chief executive officer and our other Named Executive Officers is reflected below.

LOGO

-5-


2015 Named Executive Officer Compensation

The following table sets forth the compensation of our Named Executive Officers during 2015, as calculated in accordance with applicable SEC regulations. For a complete schedule and related footnotes, please see the “Summary Compensation Table” on page 54 in the Executive Compensation section of this Proxy Statement.

Name and

Principal Position

 Salary  Bonus  Stock
Awards
  Non-Equity
Incentive  Plan
Compensation
  Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
  All Other
Compensation
  Total 

Weston M. Hicks

 $1,000,000       $4,026,509   $1,700,000       $166,176   $6,892,685  

President and chief executive officer

       

Joseph P. Brandon

  800,000        2,415,815    1,620,000        132,716    4,968,531  

Executive Vice President

       

Christopher K. Dalrymple

  630,000        951,133    614,250        103,890    2,299,273  

Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary

       

Roger B. Gorham

  600,000        271,557    270,000    256,464    100,572    1,498,593  

Senior Vice President - Head of Fixed Income and Treasurer

       

John L. Sennott, Jr.

  630,000        951,133    614,250        104,422    2,299,805  

Senior Vice President and chief financial officer

       

-6-


Long-Term Compensation HighlightsSummary

During theten-year performance period set out in the graph on page 4,5, we believe that Mr. Hicks’s compensation has been well-aligned with Alleghany’s long-term performance as can be seen in the table below:

10-yearPay-TSR(1) Alignment

10-year Pay-TSR(1) Alignment

($ in thousands)

LOGO

 

                                   CAGR 

Year

 2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  1 Year  3 Year  10 Year 

CEO Total Compensation(2)

  3,781    4,566    6,522    6,435    6,206    5,636    7,347    7,332    6,216    10,543    6,869    (34.8%)   (2.1%)   6.2

Pension Value Increase/(Decrease)

  850    856    1,160    1,594    1,066    822    1,922    1,259    (1,232  2,914    (23   

CEO SCT Compensation Excluding Pension(3)

  2,931    3,710    5,361    4,840    5,140    4,814    5,425    6,072    7,448    7,629    6,892    (9.7%)   4.3  8.9

Indexed TSR

  100    131    147    105    105    119    113    133    159    184    189    3.1  12.5  6.6

TSR vs. CEO Compensation (excl. pension) Increases / Decreases

  

  12.8%   8.2  (2.3%) 

Indexed BVPS Growth

  100    115    132    126    139    153    161    178    194    219    228    4.4  8.6  8.6

BVPS vs. CEO Compensation (excl. pension) Increases / Decreases

  

  14.1%   4.3  (0.3%) 

($ thousands)

LOGO

  Year  CAGR 
  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  1 Year  3 Year  10 Year(5) 

CEO Total Compensation(3)

  6,435   6,206   5,636   7,347   7,332   6,216   10,543   6,869   7,573   9,647   7,573   (21.5%)   3.3  1.6

Pension Value Increase/(Decrease)

  1,594   1,066   822   1,922   1,259   (1,232  2,914   (23  946   1,844   (556   

CEO SCT Compensation Excluding Pension(2)

  4,840   5,140   4,814   5,425   6,072   7,448   7,629   6,892   7,627   7,803   8,129   4.2  5.7  5.3

Indexed TSR

  100   100   113   107   126   151   174   180   229   224   238   6.3  9.9  9.1

TSR vs. CEO Compensation (excl. pension) Increases / (Decreases)

 

  2.1  4.2  3.8

Indexed BVPS Growth(4)

  100   110   122   128   142   155   174   182   193   207   201   2.8  3.4  7.2

BVPS vs. CEO Compensation (excl. pension) Increases / (Decreases)

 

  (7.0%)   (2.2%)   1.9

 

(1)

Total Shareholder Return reflects Alleghany share price appreciation including the impact of stock and cash dividends.

(2)

Represents CEO compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 59, excluding annual fluctuation in pension value.

 

-7-


(2)(3)

Includes annual fluctuation in pension value. Calculated according to SEC rules except for 2013, 2015 and 2015,2018, which include a negative value for Mr. Hicks’s pension benefit. SEC rules require that negative pension value changes are reflected as a “zero” in table.

(4)

BVPS growth includes the table.impact of stock and cash dividends.

(5)

Total Shareholder Return for this period reflects that the price of Alleghany common stock was 99% of stockholders’ equity per share on December 31, 2008, compared with 118% on December 31, 2018.

 

(3)Represents CEO compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 54, excluding annual fluctuation in pension value.

-8-

-7-


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT ALLEGHANY’S 20162019 ANNUAL MEETING

 

Q:

Why did I receive these proxy materials?

 

A:

You have received these proxy materials because the Board is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares of common stock at the 20162019 Annual Meeting.

 

Q:

Who is entitled to vote at the 20162019 Annual Meeting?

 

A:

Alleghany has one class of voting stock outstanding: its common stock. If you were a holder of common stock at the close of business on March 1, 2016,2019, the record date for the 20162019 Annual Meeting, you are entitled to vote at the meeting. At the close of business on March 1, 2016,2019, there were 15,449,75014,459,084 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Each share of common stock has one vote.

 

Q:

How can I vote my shares?

 

A:

You can vote your shares in one of two ways: either by proxy or in person at the 20162019 Annual Meeting by written ballot. If you choose to vote by proxy, you may do so using the Internet, telephone or, if you received a printed copy of your proxy materials, mail. Each of these procedures is more fully explained below. Even if you plan to attend the 20162019 Annual Meeting in person, the Board recommends that you vote promptly by proxy to ensure that your shares are represented at the 20162019 Annual Meeting.

 

Q:

How can I vote my shares by proxy?

 

A:

Because many stockholders cannot attend the 20162019 Annual Meeting in person, it is necessary that a large number of stockholders be represented by proxy. You may vote your proxy using the Internet, telephone or, if you received a printed copy of your proxy materials, mail, each as more fully explained below. In the case of voting your proxy using the Internet or telephone, the deadline for voting is 1:00 a.m. (Eastern Daylight Time) on Friday, April 22, 2016.26, 2019. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, please see the voting instructions provided by such party.

 

Vote by Internet

  To vote your shares via the Internet, go to the voting website, www.envisionreports.com/YAL. Internet voting is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. You will have the opportunity to confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. Our Internet voting procedures are designed to authenticate stockholders through individual control numbers. If you vote via the Internet, you may incur costs such as Internet access fees for which you will be responsible.If you received a proxy card in the mail and choose to vote via the Internet, you do not need to return your proxy card.

Vote by Telephone

  If you reside in the United States, Canada or U.S. territories, you can vote your shares by telephone by calling the toll-free number provided on the voting website www.envisionreports.com/YAL and on the proxy card. Telephone voting is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week.Easy-to-follow voice prompts allow you to vote your shares and confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. Our telephone voting procedures are designed to authenticate stockholders through individual control numbers.If you received a proxy card in the mail and choose to vote by telephone, you do not need to return your proxy card.

Vote by Mail

  If you received a printed copy of your proxy materials, you can vote your shares by completing and mailing the enclosed proxy card to us so that we receive it by the deadline.

 

-8--9-


If you properly sign and return your proxy card or submit your proxy using the Internet or telephone, your shares will be voted as you direct. If you sign and return your proxy card but do not specify how to vote, we will vote your shares in accordance with the Board’s recommendations: “FOR” each of the Board’s nominees for director; “FOR” the ratification of the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm; and “FOR” the advisory resolution on executive compensation.

 

Q:

How can I vote my shares in person?

 

A:

If you wish to vote in person at the 20162019 Annual Meeting, written ballots will be available at the meeting. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, you must obtain a proxy, executed in your favor, from that holder of record to be able to vote in person at the 20162019 Annual Meeting. Voting by proxy, whether by Internet, telephone or mail, will not limit your right to vote at the 20162019 Annual Meeting if you decide to attend in person. However, if you vote by proxy and also attend the 20162019 Annual Meeting, there is no need to vote in person at the meeting unless you wish to change your vote.

 

Q:

How can I attend the 20162019 Annual Meeting?

 

A:

You are entitled to attend the 20162019 Annual Meeting if you were a stockholder of Alleghany as of the close of business on March 1, 2016,2019, the record date, or if you hold a valid proxy for the 20162019 Annual Meeting. You should be prepared to present photo identification for admittance. If you are a stockholder of record, your name will be verified against the list of stockholders of record on the record date prior to your admission to the 20162019 Annual Meeting. If you are not a stockholder of record, but hold shares through a broker, bank or nominee (i.e., in street name), you should provide proof of beneficial ownership on the record date, such as your most recent account statement prior to March 1, 2016,2019, a copy of the voting instruction card provided by your broker, bank or nominee, or other similar evidence of ownership. If you do not provide photo identification or comply with the other procedures outlined above, you may not be admitted to the 20162019 Annual Meeting.

The 20162019 Annual Meeting will begin promptly on April 22, 2016,26, 2019, at 10:00 a.m., local time. You should allow adequate time forcheck-in procedures.

 

Q:

Can I change my vote?

 

A:

Yes. You can change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised at the 20162019 Annual Meeting by taking any one of the following actions: (1) follow the instructions given for changing your vote via the Internet or by telephone or deliver a valid written proxy with a later date than the previous proxy; (2) notify in writing the Secretary of Alleghany in writing that you have revoked your proxy (using the address in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders above); or (3) vote in person by written ballot at the 20162019 Annual Meeting. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, you must contact that holder of record to revoke a previously authorized proxy.

 

Q:

How many shares must be present to conduct the 20162019 Annual Meeting?

 

A:

A quorum comprising the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Alleghany’s common stock on the record date, or 7,724,87614,459,084 shares, must be present in person or represented by proxy for the transaction of business at the 20162019 Annual Meeting. Abstentions and “brokernon-votes” (which are explained below) are counted as present to determine whether there is a quorum for the 20162019 Annual Meeting.

 

Q:

What if I am a beneficial owner and do not give instructions to my broker?

 

A:

If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, you are considered the beneficial owner of those shares, but not the record holder. As a beneficial owner, in order to ensure your shares are voted in the way you would like, you must provide voting instructions to your broker by the

-9-


deadline provided in the proxy materials you receive from your broker. Under the rules of the New York

-10-


Stock Exchange, or the “NYSE,” unless you provide specific voting instructions, your broker is not permitted to vote your shares on your behalf, except with respect to theroutine proposals. The ratification of the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 2). constitutes a routine proposal. For your vote on any other matter to be counted, you will need to provide voting instructions to your broker before the date of the 20162019 Annual Meeting using the instructions provided by your broker.

A “brokernon-vote” occurs when your broker submits a proxy for your shares but does not indicate a vote for a particular proposal because the broker does not have authority to vote on that proposal and has not received voting instructions from you. “Brokernon-votes” are counted as present to determine whether there is a quorum for the 20162019 Annual Meeting, but are not counted as votes for or against the proposal in question or as abstentions, nor are they counted to determine the number of votes present for the particular proposal.

 

Q:

What vote is required to pass each of the proposals at the 20162019 Annual Meeting?

 

A:

Proposal 1: Election of Directors. Each of the twothree nominees for director who receives at least a majority of the votes cast with respect to the election of such nominee will be elected. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will have no effect on the results of this vote. In accordance with the majority voting standard in Alleghany’sBy-Laws, or the “By-Laws,“By-Laws, and the Corporate Governance Guidelines of Alleghany, or the “Corporate Governance Guidelines,” as a condition of his or her nomination, each nominee is required to tender to the Board at the time of nomination an irrevocable resignation, effective if such nominee does not receive the majority vote required by theBy-Laws and the Board determines to accept such resignation. In the event that a director nominee fails to receive the requisite majority vote, the Nominating and Governance Committee will evaluate such resignation and make a recommendation to the Board as to whether it should accept the resignation.

Proposal 2: Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal is required to ratify the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the results of this vote. The approval of Proposal 2 is a routine proposal on which a broker or other nominee is generally empowered to vote in the absence of voting instructions from the beneficial owner, so brokernon-votes are unlikely to result from this proposal.

Proposal 3: Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal is required to approve the advisory resolution on executive compensation. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will have no effect on the results of this vote. Although this proposal isnon-binding on the Board, the Board and the Compensation Committee will review and consider the voting results when making future decisions about Alleghany’s executive compensation program.

 

Q:

How does the Board recommend I vote?

 

A:

The Board recommends that you vote as follows on each proposal:

 

  Voting Matter Board’s Recommendation

Additional

   Information   

  Proposal 1:

Election of Directors

 FOR each director nominee    pages 27 - 32

  Proposal 2: Ratification of

Selection of Independent Registered

                          Public Accounting Firm

 FORpages 33 and 34

  Proposal 3:

Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

 FORpages 36 - 72

 

Q:

What happens if a nominee for director does not stand for election?

 

A:

If for any reason any nominee does not stand for election, any proxies we receive will be voted in favor of the remaining nominees and may be voted for a substitute nominee in place of the nominee who does not stand. We have no reason to expect that eitherany of the nominees will not stand for election.

 

-10--11-


Q:

What happens if additional matters are presented at the 20162019 Annual Meeting?

 

A:

If any matters other than the three items of business described in this Proxy Statement are properly presented for consideration at the 20162019 Annual Meeting, persons named on the voting website and your proxy card will have discretion to vote for you on those matters. At the time this Proxy Statement was printed, we knew of no other matters to be raised at the 20162019 Annual Meeting.

 

Q:

Who nominates the directors?

 

A:

Karen Brenner, and John G. Foos and Lauren M. Tyler have been nominated by the Board for election as directors at the 20162019 Annual Meeting. Each of the nominees is a current member of the Board and was recommended to the Board for nomination by the Nominating and Governance Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee will receive at any time and will consider from time to time suggestions from stockholders as to proposed director candidates, as described under “Director“Directors’ Nominations and Qualifications” on pages 1618 and 17.19. Additionally, stockholders may nominate individuals for election as directors in accordance with the requirements set forth in theBy-Laws and described under “Stockholder Nominations and Proposals” on page 70.73.

 

Q:

How are proxies solicited and what is the cost?

 

A:

We pay the cost of soliciting proxies for the meeting. Proxies may be solicited in person by our employees, or by mail, courier, telephone, facsimile ore-mail. In addition, we have retained Georgeson Shareholder Communications Inc., or “Georgeson,” to aid in the solicitation of proxies by mail, courier, telephone, facsimile ande-mail. We expect to pay a fee of approximately $9,500 plus expenses to Georgeson Shareholder Communications Inc. for these services.

 

Q:

What is householding? Does Alleghany use it?

 

A:

In accordance with a notice sent to eligible stockholders who share a single address, we are sending only one annual report to stockholders and one proxy statement to that address unless we received instructions to the contrary from any stockholder at that address. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce our printing and postage costs.

If, in the future, you wish to receive a separate annual report to stockholders and proxy statement, a separate copy may be obtained, without charge, upon written or oral request to the office of the Secretary, Alleghany Corporation, 7 Times Square Tower,1411 Broadway, 34th Floor, New York, New York 10036,10018, telephone number(212) 752-1356. Eligible stockholders of record who receive multiple copies of our annual report to stockholders and proxy statement can request householding by contacting us in the same manner. Stockholders who own shares through a bank, broker or other nominee can request householding by contacting the nominee. We hereby undertake to deliver promptly, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of the annual report to stockholders and proxy statement to a stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the document was delivered.

 

Q:

Where can I find more information about Alleghany?

 

A:

Alleghany’s website address is www.alleghany.com. Alleghany makes available, free of charge on its website, the documents it files with the SEC. Also available on Alleghany’s website are its Financial Personnel Code of Ethics, Employee Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Our Business Partners, Corporate Governance Guidelines, and the charters for the Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Governance Committees. The information contained on Alleghany’s website is not included as a part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Proxy Statement.

 

-11--12-


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board of DirectorsComposition

Pursuant to Alleghany’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation andBy-Laws, the Board is divided into three separate classes of directors, which are required to be as nearly equal in number as practicable. At each Annual Meeting of Stockholders, one class of directors is elected to a term of three years. Currently, there are three standing committees of the Board, consisting of annamely the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee. Additional information regarding these committees is set out on pages 13 through 15.16 to 18.

The Board currently consists of tennine directors. Mr. Stephen P. Bradley, who has served asAt a director of Alleghany since 2012, and Mr. Thomas S. Johnson, who has served as a director of Alleghany since 1997 and for 1992-1993, are retiring from the Board effective at the 2016 Annual Meeting in accordance with Alleghany’s director retirement policy as described on page 17. In this regard, because Mr. Bradley and Mr. Johnson are not standing for re-election, in order to make the classesmeeting of the Board as nearly equal in size as practicable,on January 15, 2019, the Board determinedincreased its size from eight to nominate Mr. John G. Foos, whonine directors and elected Lauren M. Tyler to fill the vacancy created by such increase in size. Ms. Tyler was last elected for a term due to the Boardexpire at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to stand for re-election at the 20162019 Annual Meeting. As a result, theThe directors nominated by the Board for election at the 20162019 Annual Meeting to the class of 20192022 are Ms.Karen Brenner, John G. Foos and Mr. Foos. If bothLauren M. Tyler. Each of Ms. Brenner and Mr. Foos are elected, the sizenominees is a current member of the Board will be reduced effectiveand was recommended to the Board for nomination by the Nominating and Governance Committee. Mr. Foos and Ms. Brenner were last elected by stockholders at the 2016 Annual Meeting fromof Stockholders held on April 22, 2016.

As stated in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board “currently believes that it is desirable over time to have a Board of between eight and ten members (allowing that a larger or smaller number may be necessary or advisable in periods of transition or other particular circumstances).” In March 2012, upon the closing of Alleghany’s acquisition of Transatlantic Holdings, Inc., or “TransRe,” three former members of the board of directors of TransRe joined the Alleghany Board, resulting in a14-person Board. Through 2018, Alleghany intentionally allowed the Board to eight directors.decrease in size through the mandatory and elective retirements of six Board members, resulting in an eight-member Board at 2018year-end.

We have strong director engagement on our Board. Cognizant of upcoming mandatory retirements, the Board in 2018 evaluated potential new Board members, as well as the characteristics desired in such potential Board members. In this regard, the Board sought candidates with diverse business and professional backgrounds and outstanding integrity and judgment, and such other skills and experience as would enhance the Board’s ability to best serve Alleghany’s interests. In addition, the Board specifically considered diversity as one of many factors in its evaluation. As discussed above, the Board’s evaluation culminated in the appointment of Ms. Tyler to the Board in January 2019, and she is standing for election at the 2019 Annual Meeting.

The Board held eight meetings in 2015. Eachfollowing charts illustrate the characteristics of our incumbent directors, attended at least 96 percent of the meetings of the Boardincluding independence, diversity, age and committees of the Board on which he or she served in 2015, with nine of our current ten directors attending 100 percent of the Board and committee meetings. Executive sessions for independent directors are held at each regularly scheduled Board meeting. The Chairman of the Board, or the “Chairman,” who is currently an independent director, presides at these executive sessions. Alleghany does not have a policy with regard to attendance by directors at Annual Meetings of Stockholders. Two directors attended the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.tenure.

LOGO

-13-


Director Independence

Pursuant to the NYSE’s listing standards, Alleghany is required to have a majority of independent directors, and no director qualifies as independent unless the Board affirmatively determines that the director has no material relationship with Alleghany. The Board has determined that none of ourthe directors who served during any part of 2018, except Weston M. Hicks, our President and chief executive officer, has any material relationship with Alleghany other than in their capacities as members of the Board and committees thereof, and thus all of such directors, except Weston M. Hicks, are independent directors of Alleghany. Therefore, nineWith the January 2019 election of Lauren M. Tyler, whom the Board affirmatively determined has no material relationship with Alleghany, eight of Alleghany’s tennine current directors are independent directors. BothAll of the director nominees are independent. Assuming that all of Ms. Brenner, and Mr. Foos are independent. Following the retirement of Mr. Bradley and Mr. Johnson at the 2016 Annual Meeting, and assuming that both Ms. Brenner and Mr. FoosTyler are elected, eight of nine directors will be independent.

Board Leadership

Currently, the sizeposition of Chairman of the Board, willor the “Chairman,” and the position of President and chief executive officer are separate. It is the policy of the Board that the Chairman should not be reducedan Alleghany officer. The current Chairman is an independent director. Pursuant to the Corporate Governance Guidelines, the duties of the Chairman include providing leadership to the Board in managing the business of the Board and ensuring that there is an effective structure for the operation of the Board and its committees. The Board believes that its leadership structure is appropriate given the composition of the Board and management, the Corporate Governance Guidelines and the tenure of a majority of the Board members.

Board Meetings

We have strong director engagement on our Board. The Board held eight meetings in 2018. Each director who was a director during 2018 attended at least 95% of the meetings of the Board and committees of the Board on which he or she served in 2018, with seven of such directors attending 100% of the Board and committee meetings. Executive sessions for independent directors are held at each regularly scheduled Board meeting. The Chairman, who is currently an independent director, presides at these executive sessions. Alleghany does not have a policy with regard to attendance by directors at annual meetings of stockholders. Two directors attended the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Board Evaluation

The Board believes that an effective director evaluation process allows it to gain insights into the effectiveness of the Board, its committees and its individual members, with the goal of continually enhancing Board performance. In this regard, each year the Board and each of its committees conducts an evaluation of their respective performance, effectiveness and fulfillment of fiduciary duties. The evaluation process is overseen by the Nominating and Governance Committee and is reviewed annually to determine whether it is designed effectively and assures that appropriate feedback is being sought and reviewed. Historically, the Board evaluation was done on an overall basis through completion of a written questionnaire by each director on an anonymous basis to encourage candid feedback, supplemented by individual director interviews with the Chairman.

In 2018, the Board determined to enhance the evaluation process by adding an individual director evaluation component, along with the completion of a director skills matrix. In this regard, the Nominating and Governance Committee approved evaluation questions which were to be considered by each director with respect to himself or herself, as well as each other director, along with a skills matrix questionnaire to be completed by each director. The Chairman of the Board, using the evaluation questions as a guide, then solicited a self-evaluation from each director, as well as an evaluation of each other director. The Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee solicited from each director an evaluation of the Chairman of the Board. At the conclusion of such process, the Chairman of the Board discussed with each director the results of his or her individual evaluation,

-14-


and the Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee discussed such matters with the Chairman of the Board. The results of the written overall Board and committee evaluations were reported to and reviewed by the full Board. In general, based upon its most recent evaluation, the Board and each committee were satisfied with their respective performance and considered themselves to be operating effectively.

Chief Executive Officer and Senior Management Succession Planning

A key responsibility of our chief executive officer and Board in the area of risk management is ensuring that an effective process is in place to provide continuity of leadership over the long term. At least once each year, our Board conducts a review of chief executive officer and senior management succession planning. During this review, the chief executive officer provides the Board with recommendations on, and evaluations of, potential chief executive officer and senior management successors, succession timing for those positions, and development plans for the potential successors. Our Board reviews potential internal senior management candidates with our chief executive officer, including the qualifications, experience and development priorities for these individuals. Further, our Board periodically reviews the overall composition of our senior management’s qualifications, tenure and experience.

Our Board, in coordination with our Nominating and Governance Committee, also establishes steps to address emergency chief executive officer and senior management succession planning in extraordinary circumstances. Our emergency chief executive officer succession planning is intended to enable us to respond to unexpected position vacancies, including those resulting from a major catastrophe, by continuing our operations and minimizing potential disruption or loss of continuity to our business and operations.

Board Role in Risk Oversight

The Board oversees risk management directly and through its committees. Alleghany management regularly reports to the Board and, as appropriate, to its committees on management’s risk activities, Alleghany’s exposure and risk assessments. Enterprise risk management is a standing agenda item at each Board meeting and the chief risk officer, other Alleghany management and the Board discuss existing and emerging risks, controls and procedures, risk assessments and initiatives at such meetings. Each year, at the 2016 Annual MeetingBoard’s January meeting, the Board receives a formal report on enterprise risk management from tenAlleghany’s chief risk officer and, at the same meeting, considers Alleghany’s three-year financial projections and the evaluation of the President and chief executive officer, allowing the Board to eight directors, sevenconsider risk and risk management in the context of whom will be independent.Alleghany’s strategic plan and management’s performance. Each year, at the Audit Committee’s June meeting, it receives a formal report on enterprise risk management from Alleghany’s chief risk officer and a formal report on legal compliance and ethics from Alleghany’s chief compliance officer, which are also copied to the Board, and the chief risk officer and chief compliance officer subsequently report thereon to the Board. The Board receives updates on material developments with respect to risk management and legal compliance and ethics matters at its other regularly scheduled meetings.

The Audit Committee oversees the integrity of Alleghany’s financial statements, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the qualifications, performance and independence of independent auditors and the performance of internal audit and internal controls over financial reporting, all of which contribute to risk oversight. The Nominating and Governance Committee ensures the development of appropriate corporate governance and oversees the evaluation of the Board and management. The Compensation Committee regularly monitors compensation policies, practices and outstanding awards to determine whether Alleghany’s risk management and incentive objectives are being met with respect to group-wide employee incentives. The Board believes that risk oversight is a responsibility of the entire Board, and it does not look to any individual director or committee to lead it in discharging this responsibility.

 

-12--15-


Committees of the Board of Directors

Committee Membership

The following table sets forth the current members of each of the committees and the number of meetings held during 2015:2018:

 

Name

  

Audit

  

Compensation

  

Nominating and
Governance

  

Audit

  

Compensation

  

Nominating and

    Governance    

Stephen P. Bradley

  ü    ü

Karen Brenner

  ü    Chair      Chair

Ian H. Chippendale

    Chair        

John G. Foos

  ü    ü      

Thomas S. Johnson

    ü  ü

William K. Lavin

  Chair  ü    Chair    

Phillip M. Martineau

    ü  ü      

Raymond L.M. Wong

  ü  ü      Chair  

2015 meetings

  7  6  5

2018 meetings

  7  8  6

The Board has determined that each committee member is independent as defined in the NYSE’s listing standards with respect to membership on each committee on which he or she serves. The Board also has determined that each member of the Audit Committee has the qualifications set forth in the NYSE’s listing standards regarding financial literacy and accounting or related financial management expertise and is an audit committee financial expert as defined by the SEC.

-16-


Committee Responsibilities

Each of the committees listed below operates pursuant to a charter, a copy of which is available on Alleghany’s website at www.alleghany.com or may be obtained, without charge, upon written request to the Secretary of Alleghany at Alleghany’s principal executive offices. The primary functions of each committee are as follows:

 

Board Committee  Responsibilities

Audit Committee

  

•   Directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of our independent registered public accounting firm, including approving in advance all audit services and permissiblenon-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm.

 

•   Directly responsible for the evaluation of such firm’s qualifications, performance and independence.

 

•   Reviews and makes reports and recommendations to the Board with respect to the following matters:

 

•   the audited consolidated annual financial statements of Alleghany and its subsidiaries, including Alleghany’s specific disclosures under MD&A, and critical accounting estimates, to be included in Alleghany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC, and whether to recommend this inclusion;

 

-13-


Board CommitteeResponsibilities

•   the unaudited consolidated quarterly financial statements of Alleghany and its subsidiaries, including MD&A, to be included in Alleghany’s Quarterly Reports on Form10-Q filed with the SEC;

 

•   Alleghany’s policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management;

 

•   the adequacy and effectiveness of Alleghany’s internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures;

 

•   the compensation, activities and performance of Alleghany’s internal auditor;auditors; and

 

•   the quality and acceptability of Alleghany’s accounting policies, including critical accounting estimates and practices and the estimates and assumptions used by management in the preparation of Alleghany’s financial statements.

 

Compensation Committee

  

•   Administers Alleghany’s executive compensation program, including Alleghany’s 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan, or the “2007 LTIP,” 2012 LTIP, the 2010 MIP,long-term and 2015 Management Incentive Plan, or the “2015 MIP.”annual incentive plans.

 

•   Reviews and approves the financial goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the chief executive officer; evaluates the chief executive officer’s performance in light of such goals and objectives; and determines the chief executive officer’s compensation based on such evaluation.

 

-17-


Board CommitteeResponsibilities

•   Reviews the annual recommendations of the chief executive officer concerning:

 

•   the compensation of the other Alleghany officers and proposed adjustments to such officers’ compensation; and

 

•   the adjustments proposed to be made to the compensation of the three most highly paid officers of each Alleghany operating subsidiary as recommended by the compensation committee or board of directors (as applicable) for each such operating subsidiary.

 

•   Reports on the actions described above to the Board and makes recommendations with respect to such actions to the Board as the committee may deem appropriate.

 

•   Reviews the compensation of the directors on an annual basis, including compensation for service on committees of the Board, and proposing changes, as appropriate, to the Board.

 

-14-


Board CommitteeResponsibilities

Nominating and Governance Committee

  

•   Identifies and screens director candidates, consistent with criteria approved by the Board.

 

•   Makes recommendations to the Board as to persons to be (i) nominated by the Board for election to the Board by stockholders or (ii) chosen by the Board to fill newly created directorships or vacancies on the Board.

 

•   Develops and recommends to the Board a set of corporate governance principles applicable to Alleghany.

 

•   Oversees the evaluation of the Board, individual directors and Alleghany’s management.

Board Tenure

We believe that it is important to achieve an appropriate balance on the Board between the number of our longer-tenured directors who have a deep knowledge of Alleghany, and the number of newer directors who provide fresh perspectives. The chart below shows the breakdown by years of service on the Board. To help spur periodic change on the Board, our Corporate Governance Guidelines set a mandatory retirement age, as described on page 17, after which directors may no longer be nominated or re-nominated to the Board.

LOGO

Board Leadership

Currently, the position of Chairman and the position of President and chief executive officer are separate. It is the policy of the Board that the Chairman should not be an Alleghany officer. The current Chairman is an independent director. Pursuant to the Corporate Governance Guidelines, the duties of the Chairman include providing leadership to the Board in managing the business of the Board and ensuring that there is an effective structure for the operation of the Board and its committees. The Board believes that its leadership structure is appropriate given the composition of the Board and management, the Corporate Governance Guidelines and the tenure of a majority of the Board members.

Chief Executive Officer and Senior Management Succession Planning

A key responsibility of our chief executive officer and Board in the area of risk management is ensuring that an effective process is in place to provide continuity of leadership over the long-term. At least once each year, our Board conducts a review of chief executive officer and senior management succession planning. During this review, the chief executive officer provides the Board with recommendations on, and evaluations of, potential chief executive officer and senior management successors, succession timing for those positions, and

-15-


development plans for the potential successors. Our Board reviews potential internal senior management candidates with our chief executive officer, including the qualifications, experience and development priorities for these individuals. Further, our Board periodically reviews the overall composition of our senior management’s qualifications, tenure and experience.

Our Board, in coordination with our Nominating and Governance Committee, also establishes steps to address emergency chief executive officer and senior management succession planning in extraordinary circumstances. Our emergency chief executive officer succession planning is intended to enable us to respond to unexpected position vacancies, including those resulting from a major catastrophe, by continuing our operation and minimizing potential disruption or loss of continuity to our business and operations.

Board Evaluation

Each year, the Board and each of its committees conducts an evaluation of their respective performance, effectiveness and fulfillment of fiduciary duties. The evaluation process is overseen by the Nominating and Governance Committee and is reviewed annually to determine whether it is designed effectively and assure that appropriate feedback is being sought and reviewed. The Board evaluation is done anonymously to encourage candid feedback, supplemented by individual director interviews with the Chairman. The results of the Board and committee evaluations are reported to and reviewed by the full Board. In general, in 2015 the Board and each committee were satisfied with their respective performance and considered themselves to be operating effectively, with appropriate balance among governance, oversight, strategic and operational matters.

Board Role in Risk Oversight

The Board oversees risk management directly and through its committees. In addition, Alleghany management has several committees that it uses to monitor and manage risk at Alleghany and its subsidiaries, including an Enterprise Risk Management, or “ERM,” Committee, Reinsurance Security Committee and Ethics and Legal Compliance Committee. Alleghany management regularly reports to the Board and, as appropriate, to its committees on management’s risk activities, Alleghany’s exposure and risk assessments. ERM is a standing agenda item at each Board meeting and the chief risk officer, Alleghany management and Board discuss existing and emerging risks, controls and procedures, risk assessments and initiatives at such meetings. Each year, at the Board’s January meeting, the Board receives a formal report on enterprise risk management from Alleghany’s chief risk officer and, at the same meeting, considers Alleghany’s three-year financial estimates and the evaluation of the President and chief executive officer, allowing the Board to consider risk and risk management in the context of Alleghany’s strategic plan and management’s performance. Each year, at the Audit Committee’s June meeting, it receives a formal report on enterprise risk management from Alleghany’s chief risk officer and a formal report on legal compliance from Alleghany’s chief compliance officer, which are also copied to the Board, and the chief risk officer and chief compliance officer subsequently report thereon to the Board. The Board receives updates on material developments with respect to risk management and legal compliance matters at its other regularly scheduled meetings. The Compensation Committee regularly monitors compensation policies, practices and outstanding awards to determine whether Alleghany’s risk management and incentive objectives are being met with respect to group-wide employee incentives. The Board believes that risk oversight is a responsibility of the entire Board, and it does not look to any individual director or committee to lead it in discharging this responsibility.

DirectorsDirectors’ Nominations and Qualifications

The Nominating and Governance Committee identifies and recommends candidates for election to the Board, consistent with general criteria approved by the Board. The Board has not approved any specific criteria that must be met by each director nominee nor established a procedure for identifying and evaluating nominees for director. The Board believes that establishing such criteria is best left to an evaluation of Alleghany’s needs at the time that a nomination is considered. The Board generally seeks members with diverse business and professional backgrounds and outstanding integrity and judgment, and such other skills and experience as will enhance the Board’s ability to best serve Alleghany’s interests. As a general matter, the Nominating and Governance Committee does consider diversity in identifying and evaluating possible nominees for director.

-16-


The Nominating and Governance Committee will receive at any time and will consider from time to time suggestions from stockholders as toregarding proposed director candidates. In this regard, a stockholder may submit a recommendation regarding a proposed director nominee in writing to the Nominating and Governance Committee in care of the Secretary of Alleghany at Alleghany’s principal executive offices. Any such persons recommended by a stockholder will be evaluated in the same manner as persons identified by the Nominating and Governance Committee.

A director is required to notify the Nominating and Governance Committee when a director’s principal occupation or business association changes substantially. The Nominating and Governance Committee will

-18-


consider whether any such change may materially interfere with the director’s service as a director of Alleghany and make a recommendation to the Board in this regard.

During 2018, at the request of the Board, the Nominating and Governance Committee undertook a process to identify a new director. The Nominating and Governance Committee determined that it would seek to identify a candidate who would have complementary business experience and would enhance board diversity. The Nominating and Governance Committee solicited directors to determine criteria for a prospective director and engaged Spencer Stuart, a nationally recognized search firm, to assist the Nominating and Governance Committee in identifying and evaluating potential nominees, including those potential nominees proposed by the directors. Spencer Stuart provided background information to the Nominating and Governance Committee regarding potential candidates meeting its search criteria and regularly communicated with the Nominating and Governance Committee to discuss such potential candidates. After review and discussion, the Nominating and Governance Committee and Spencer Stuart identified potential nominees to be interviewed. The Nominating and Governance Committee regularly reported to the Board regarding the search’s progress. The leading candidates were then interviewed by the members of the Nominating and Governance Committee, Jefferson W. Kirby, Chairman of the Board, and Weston M. Hicks, Alleghany’s President and chief executive officer. At its meeting on November 19, 2018, the Nominating and Governance Committee determined to recommend to the Board that Ms. Lauren M. Tyler, a potential nominee who met the criteria outlined by the Board, was qualified to join the Board and that she should meet with directors at the Board’s meeting the following day and, subject to the Board’s concurrence, Ms. Tyler should be elected to the Board at its January 15, 2019 meeting. The Board met with Ms. Tyler at its meeting on November 20, 2018, and Ms. Tyler was elected as a director by the Board at its January 15, 2019 meeting, to serve until the 2019 Annual Meeting.

Communications with Directors

Interested parties may communicate directly with any individual director, the independent directors as a group or the Board as a whole by mailing such communication to the Secretary of Alleghany at Alleghany’s principal executive offices. Any such communications will be delivered unopened:

 

if addressed to a specific director, to such director;

 

if addressed to the independent directors, to the ChairmanChair of the Nominating and Governance Committee who will report thereon to the independent directors; or

 

if addressed to the Board, to the Chairman of the Board who will report thereon to the Board.

Stockholder Engagement

Alleghany is committed to the interests of its stockholders and recognizes that communicating with stockholders on a regular basis is a critical part of this commitment. In this regard, Alleghany actively engages with its stockholders in order to understand fully their viewpoints concerning Alleghany and to help stockholders better understand Alleghany’s strategy and performance. Management regularly engages with investors by participating in industry conferences, and also meets in person and by telephone with stockholders at other times throughout the year to solicit input and answer questions. Management also communicates to stockholders the Board’s willingness to meet with them upon request and shares stockholder viewpoints with the Board. We believe our regular engagement with stockholders has been productive and provides an open exchange of ideas and perspectives for both Alleghany and its stockholders. Although we are open to meeting with all Alleghany stockholders, in 2018, we met withnon-affiliated stockholders who held shares representing approximately 53% of Alleghany’s shares of common stock held bynon-affiliates.

Director Retirement Policy

Alleghany’s retirement policy for directors provides that a director must retire from the Board at the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders following his or her 75th birthday.

-19-


Codes of Ethics

Alleghany has adopted an Employee Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for all employees of Alleghany and its subsidiaries, a Financial Personnel Code of Ethics for its chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer and all other officers in its Finance Department, a Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for members of the Board, a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Our Business Partners for third parties with whom we do business, and the Corporate Governance Guidelines. A copy of each of these documents is available on Alleghany’s website at www.alleghany.com or may be obtained, without charge, upon written request to the Secretary of Alleghany at Alleghany’s principal executive offices. Alleghany will disclose on its website any substantive amendments to its codes of ethics and any waivers from the provisions of its codes of ethics made with respect to its chief executive officer, chief financial officer or chief accounting officer (or persons performing similar functions), as well as with respect to any other executive officer or any director of Alleghany.

Majority Election of Directors

TheBy-Laws provide for a majority voting standard for the election of directors for uncontested elections. In connection with such provision of theBy-Laws, the Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that a director nominee, as a condition of his or her nomination, shall tender to the Board at the time of nomination an irrevocable resignation effective if such nominee fails to receive the majority vote required by theBy-Laws and the Board determines to accept such resignation. In the event that a director nominee fails to receive the requisite majority vote, the Nominating and Governance Committee will evaluate such resignation in light of Alleghany’s

-17-


best interests and make a recommendation to the Board as to whether it should accept the resignation. In making its recommendation, the Nominating and Governance Committee may consider any factors it deems relevant, including:

 

the director’s qualifications;

 

the director’s past and expected future contributions to Alleghany;

 

the overall composition of the Board; and

 

whether accepting the tendered resignation would cause Alleghany to fail to meet any applicable rule or regulation, including the NYSE’s listing standards and federal securities laws.

The Board, by vote of independent directors other than the director whose resignation is being evaluated, will act on the tendered resignation and will publicly disclose its decision and rationale within 90 days following certification of the stockholder vote.

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

Directors are expected to achieve ownership of common stock, or restricted stock units, having an aggregate value (based upon the higher of market value or book value) equal to at least five times the annual board retainer within five years of election to the Board, and to maintain such a level thereafter.

Hedging and Pledging Policies

Alleghany maintains a policy on insider trading and compliance that prohibits directors from directly or indirectly purchasing or using financial instruments designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of Alleghany securities that they own. In addition, under such policy, directors are prohibited from pledging Alleghany securities as collateral.

-20-


Related Party Transactions

The Board has adopted a written Related Party Transaction Policy, or “the Policy.” Pursuant to the Policy, all related party transactions must be approved in advance by the Board. Under the Policy, a related party transaction means any transaction, other than compensation for services as an officer or director authorized and approved by the Compensation Committee or the Board, in which Alleghany or any of its subsidiaries is a participant and in which any of the following persons has or will have a direct or indirect material interest:

 

any director or officer of Alleghany; or

 

any immediate family member of such director or officer, which means any child, stepchild, parent, stepparent, spouse, sibling,mother-in-law,father-in-law,son-in-law,daughter-in-law,brother-in-law orsister-in-law and any person (other than a tenant or employee) sharing the household of such director or officer.

A person who has a position or relationship with a firm, corporation or other entity may be deemed to have an indirect interest in any transaction in which that entity engages. However, a person is not deemed to have an interest if such interest arises only from such person’s position as a director of another corporation and/or such person’s direct and indirect ownership of less than 10% of the equity of such firm, corporation or other entity.

-18-


Under the Policy, all newly proposed related party transactions are referred to the Nominating and Governance Committee for review and consideration of its recommendation to the Board. Following this review, the related party transaction and the Nominating and Governance Committee’s analysis and recommendations are presented to the full Board (other than any directors interested in the transaction) for approval. The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews existing related party transactions annually, with the goals of ensuring that such transactions are being pursued in accordance with all of the understandings and commitments made at the time they were approved, ensuring that payments being made with respect to such transactions are appropriately reviewed and documented, and reaffirming that such transactions remain in the best interests of Alleghany. The Nominating and Governance Committee reports any such findings to the Board.

As initially disclosed in the proxy statement prepared for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Zachary A. Hicks, a son of Weston M. Hicks, Alleghany’s President and chief executive officer, commenced employment with TransRe as an underwriter in March 2017. Zachary Hicks’s 2018 aggregate compensation was $125,365 and was established in accordance with TransRe’s employment and compensation practices applicable to employees with equivalent qualifications, experience, and responsibilities. Zachary Hicks is also eligible to participate in TransRe’s employee benefit programs on the same basis as other eligible employees. Mr. Hicks did not participate in TransRe’s compensation decisions relating to Zachary Hicks.

 

-19--21-


PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of each person who, based upon filings made by such person with the SEC, as of March 1, 2016,2019, was the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the outstanding common stock.

 

  Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership of Common  Stock(1)   Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock(1) 

Name and Address

of Beneficial Owner

  Sole Voting
Power and/or Sole
Investment Power
   Shared Voting Power
and/or Shared
Investment Power
   Total Percent of
Class
   Sole Voting
Power and/or Sole
Investment Power
   Shared Voting Power
and/or Shared
Investment Power
   Total Percent of
Class
 

BlackRock, Inc.

   1,346,829          1,346,829(2)   8.6     1,520,396        1,520,396(2)  10.2 

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10022

              

The Vanguard Group

   1,013,420     17,208     1,030,628(3)   6.6     1,309,976    12,665    1,322,641(3)  8.9 

100 Vanguard Boulevard

Malvern, PA 19355

              

Boston Partners

One Beacon Street

Boston, MA 02108

   917,824        917,824(4)   6.2 

 

(1)

As of March 1, 2016,2019, there were 15,449,75014,459,084 shares of common stock outstanding.

 

(2)

According to an amendment dated January 20, 201624, 2019 to a Schedule 13G statement filed by BlackRock, Inc., an investment advisory company (“BlackRock”), BlackRock has sole voting power over 1,218,4801,415,821 shares of common stock and sole dispositive power over 1,346,8291,520,396 shares of common stock.

 

(3)

According to an amendment dated February 10, 201611, 2019 to a Schedule 13G statement filed by The Vanguard Group, an investment adviser (“Vanguard”), Vanguard has sole voting power over 14,80810,213 shares of common stock, sole dispositive power over 1,013,4201,309,976 shares of common stock, shared voting power over 2,833 shares of common stock and shared dispositive power over 17,20812,665 shares of common stock.

(4)

According to an amendment dated February 12, 2019 to a Schedule 13G filed by Boston Partners, an investment adviser (“Boston Partners”), Boston Partners has sole voting power over 715,212 shares of common stock and sole dispositive power over 917,824 shares of common stock.

 

-20--22-


EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The name, age, current position, date elected and prior business experience of each of the Named Executive Officers is as follows:

 

Name

 Age 

Current Position (date elected)

 

Prior Business Experience

Weston M. Hicks

 5962 President and chief executive officer (since December 2004) Executive Vice President, Alleghany (October 2002 to December 2004).

Joseph P. Brandon

 5760 Executive Vice President (since March 2012) Consultant to Alleghany (September 2011 to March 2012); private investor (May 2008 to August 2011); Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, General Re Corporation, a property and casualty reinsurer and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (September 2001 to April 2008).

Christopher K. Dalrymple

 4851 Senior Vice President (since January 2012), General Counsel (since July 2009) and Secretary (since January 2011) Vice President, Alleghany (December 2004 to January 2012); Associate General Counsel, Alleghany (March 2002 to July 2009); Assistant Secretary;Secretary, Alleghany (March 2002 to January 2011).

Roger B. Gorham

53Senior Vice President — Head of Fixed Income and Treasurer (since May 2013)Senior Vice President — Finance and Investments and chief financial officer, Alleghany (January 2006 to May 2013); Senior Vice President — Finance and chief financial officer, Alleghany (May 2005 to January 2006); Senior Vice President — Finance, Alleghany (December 2004 to May 2005).

John L. Sennott, Jr.

 5053 Senior Vice President (since April 2013) and chief financial officer (since May 2013) Consultant (April 2012 to April 2013); Executive Vice President and Chief Corporate Strategy Officer (January 2010 to April 2012) and Chief Operating Officer (October 2008 to January 2010), Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, AG, a property and casualty (re)insurer.

 

-21--23-


SECURITIES OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth, as of March 1, 2016,2019, the beneficial ownership of common stock of each of the nominees named for election as a director, each of the other current directors, each of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table on page 5459 and all nominees, directors and executive officers as a group.

 

      Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership
of Common Stock
       Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership
of Common Stock
 

Name of Beneficial Owner

  Sole Voting
Power and/or  Sole
Investment Power
   Shared Voting  Power
and/or Shared
Investment Power
   Total  Percent
of Class
   Sole Voting
Power and/or Sole
Investment Power
   Shared Voting Power
and/or Shared
Investment Power
   Total Percent
of Class
 

Stephen P. Bradley

   1,696          1,696   (1)   *  

Joseph P. Brandon

   1,000     23,032     24,032   (2)   *     1,000    23,329    24,329(1)  * 

Karen Brenner

   3,961          3,961   (1)   *     4,762        4,762(2)  * 

Ian H. Chippendale

   1,696          1,696   (1)   *     2,473        2,473(2)  * 

Christopher K. Dalrymple

   31     4,000     4,031   (3)   *     10    5,000    5,010(3)  * 

John G. Foos

   1,696     648     2,344   (1)(4)   *     2,473    648    3,121(2)(4)  * 

Roger B. Gorham

   7,150          7,150      *  

Weston M. Hicks

   46,751     18,919     65,670   (5)   *     65,696        65,696(5)  * 

Thomas S. Johnson

   10,154          10,154   (1)   *  

Jefferson W. Kirby

   92,163     396,677     488,840   (1)(6)   3.17     132,670    236,507    369,177(2)(6)  2.55 

William K. Lavin

   6,006          6,006   (1)   *     3,691        3,691(2)  * 

Phillip M. Martineau

   4,070          4,070   (1)   *     2,437    1,620    4,057(2)(7)  * 

John L. Sennott, Jr.

        3,150     3,150      *         5,548    5,548(8)  * 

Lauren M. Tyler

             

Raymond L.M. Wong

   8,692     1,500     10,192   (1)(7)   *     9,615        9,615(2)(9)  * 

All nominees, directors and executive officers as a group (14 persons)

   185,066     447,926     632,992      4.1(8)  

All nominees, directors and executive officers
as a group (12 persons)

   224,827    272,652    497,479      3.44(10) 

 

*

Represents less than 1.0%.

 

(1)

Does not include any shares that may be issued upon the vesting of outstanding restricted stock units held by Mr. Brandon. Includes 3,65423,329 shares of common stock in the case of Messrs. Johnson, Lavin,held jointly with Mr. Brandon’s spouse, over which Mr. Brandon shares voting and Mr. Kirby, 3,102investment power.

(2)

Includes 2,062 shares of common stock in the case of Mr. Wong, 1,510Kirby, 1,534 shares of common stock in the case of Ms. Brenner, Mr. Lavin and Mr. MartineauWong and 500508 shares of common stock in the case of Messrs. Bradley,Mr. Martineau, Mr. Chippendale and Mr. Foos, issuable under stock options granted pursuant to the 2015 Directors’ Stock Plan (the “2015 Directors’ Plan”), the Amended and Restated 2010 Directors’ Stock Plan (the “2010 Directors’ Plan”) and the 2005 Directors’ Stock Plan (the “2005 Directors’ Plan”).

 

(2)(3)

Does not include any shares that may be issued upon the vesting of outstanding restricted stock units held by Mr. Brandon.Dalrymple. Includes 23,002 shares of common stock held jointly with Mr. Brandon’s spouse, over which Mr. Brandon shares voting and investment power. Includes 30 shares of common stock held by Mr. Brandon’s children, over which Mr. Brandon shares investment power, and for which he disclaims beneficial ownership.

(3)Includes 4,0005,000 shares of common stock held jointly with Mr. Dalrymple’s spouse, over which Mr. Dalrymple shares voting and investment power.

 

(4)

Includes 648 shares of common stock held jointly with Mr. Foos’Foos’s spouse, over which Mr. Foos shares voting and investment power.

 

(5)

Includes 18,919 shares of common stock held by trusts over which Mr. Hicks has voting and investment control.

 

-22--24-


(6)

Includes 159,097(a) 218,349 shares of common stock held by trusts of which Mr. Kirby is co-trustee and beneficiary and (b) 17,775 shares of common stock held by a trust of which Mr. Kirby is co-trustee and his descendants are beneficiaries, over all of which Mr. Kirby shares voting and investment power as to such shares;power. Also includes (a) 27,586 shares as toof common stock held by a trust of which Mr. Kirby is sole trustee and beneficiary and (b) 18,670 shares of common stock held by a trust of which Mr. Kirby is sole trustee and his descendants are beneficiaries, over all of which Mr. Kirby has sole voting and investment power; and 237,015 shares held by the Fred M. Kirby II Residuary Trust. Mr. Kirby is co-trustee of the Fred M. Kirby II Residuary Trust and shares voting and investment power as to such shares. Also includes 19 shares held by Mr. Kirby’s spouse, over which Mr. Kirby shares voting and investment power, 546power; and 364 shares held by Mr. Kirby’s children, over which Mr. Kirby shares voting and investment power,power.

(7)

Includes 1,620 shares of common stock held jointly with Mr. Martineau’s spouse, over which Mr. Martineau shares voting and 23investment power.

(8)

Does not include any shares werethat may be issued upon the vesting of outstanding restricted stock units held by Mr. Sennott. Includes 5,084 shares of common stock held jointly with Mr. Sennott’s spouse, over which Mr. Sennott shares voting and investment power.

(9)

Includes (a) 300 shares of common stock held by a limited liability company with Mr. Kirby exercising sole voting and investment power in respect of such shares.

(7)Includes 600 shares of common stock owned by Mr. Wong’s children, over which Mr. Wong shares voting and investment power, and(b) 900 shares of common stock held by a trust, over all of which Mr. Wong shareshas voting and investment power.

 

(8)(10)

Based on the number of shares of outstanding common stock as of March 1, 2016,2019, adjusted in the case of each director to include shares of common stock issuable within 60 days upon exercise of stock options held by such director.

 

-23--25-


Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Alleghany has determined that, except as set forth below, no person who at any time during 20152018 was a director, officer or beneficial owner of more than 10% of common stock failed to file on a timely basis reports required by Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the “Exchange Act,” during 2015.2017. This determination is based solely upon Alleghany’s review of Forms 3, 4 and 5, and written representations that no Form 5 was required, which such persons submitted to Alleghany during or with respect to 2015. Weston M. Hicks filed2018. In February 2018, the Board declared a special dividend of $10.00 per share for stockholders of record on March 5, 2018. Under the 2005 Directors’ Plan, 2010 Directors’ Plan and 2015 Directors’ Plan, when Alleghany pays a cash dividend on its common stock, each director holding restricted stock units, or “RSUs,” awarded under such plans is credited with a corresponding dividend on his or her RSUs in the form of additional RSUs. Due to inadvertent administrative oversight, the Form 4 required to be filed for eachnon-employee director credited with a dividend payment on April 2, 2015 reporting a transaction that occurredhis or her RSUs in the form of additional RSUs was not filed within two business days of the date of the dividend payment. Such Forms 4 were filed on January 2, 2015.

May 23, 2018.

 

-24--26-


PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Nominees for Election

Karen Brenner, and John G. Foos and Lauren M. Tyler have been nominated by the Board for election as directors at the 20162019 Annual Meeting, each to serve for a term of three years, subject to Alleghany’s director retirement policy, until the 20192022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until herhis or hisher successor is duly elected and qualified. Each of the nominees is a current member of the Board and was recommended to the Board for nomination by the Nominating and Governance Committee. Following the 2016 Annual Meeting, Mr. BradleyMs. Brenner and Mr. Johnson, members of the class of 2016, will no longer serve as directors of Alleghany. Mr. Foos was last elected to the Board at the 2015 Annual Meeting held on April 24, 2015, and has been added by the Board to the class of directors standing for re-election at the 2016 Annual Meeting in order to make the classes of the Board as nearly equal in size as practicable. Ms. Brenner waswere last elected by stockholders at the 20132016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on April 26, 2013.22, 2016. At a Board meeting on January 15, 2019, the Board increased its size from eight to nine directors and elected Lauren M. Tyler to fill the vacancy created by such increase in size. Ms. Tyler was elected for a term to expire at the 2019 Annual Meeting.

Information about Voting

Proxies received from Alleghany stockholders of record will be voted for the election of the twothree nominees named above as Alleghany directors unless such stockholders indicate otherwise. If any of the foregoing nominees is unable to serve for any reason, which is not anticipated, the shares represented by proxy may be voted for such other person or persons as may be determined by the holders of such proxy unless stockholders indicate otherwise. A nominee for director shall be elected to the Board if such nominee receives the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast with respect to the election of such nominee. A majority of votes cast means the number of votes cast “for” a nominee’s election must exceed the number of votes cast “against” the nominee’s election. Abstentions and brokernon-votes (see page 10)pages 10 and 11) do not count as votes cast “for” or “against” the nominee’s election, but will be counted as present at the meeting for quorum purposes.

Director Qualifications

The following information includes for each of the nominees named for election as director at the 20162019 Annual Meeting, and each of the other directors of Alleghany:

 

age;

 

year first elected as a director of Alleghany;

 

principal occupation and/or other business experience for the past five years;

 

other public company directorships during the past five years; and

 

experience, qualifications, attributes and skills.

In addition to the information regarding the specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led the Board to the conclusion that each of the nominees named for election as director should be elected as a director of Alleghany, Alleghany believes that each of the nominees, and each of the other directors of Alleghany, has a reputation for integrity, honesty and adherence to high ethical standards. Alleghany also believes that each of the nominees, and each of the other directors of Alleghany, has demonstrated business acumen and an ability to exercise sound judgment, as well as a commitment to service to Alleghany and to the Board.

 

-25--27-


Nominees for Election

 

Karen Brenner

Age 6063

Director since 2009

Chair of the

 Nominating and

    Governance Committee

Member of the Audit

    Committee

  

LOGO

  

Ms. Brenner has been an Executive Director of Law and Business Initiatives at New York University since 2012 and Clinical Professor of Business at the Leonard N. Stern School of Business at New York University since 2008. She teaches professional responsibility in law and business, corporate governance in law and business, and corporate transformation and leadership. Ms. Brenner also has been a principal at Brenner & Company, a financial management and advisory firm she founded, since 1998.

 

Ms. Brenner’s qualifications to serve on the Board also include her years of business experience as Chairman/Chief Executive Officer and/or a board member of public and private companies in a wide variety of industries, and as an advisor to private equity firms, venture capital companies, boards of directors and chief executive officers focusing on enhancing the value of operating companies, and her experience in corporate governance and management issues.companies.

John G. Foos

Age 6669

Director since 2012

Member of the Audit

    Committee

Member of the

Nominating     and

Governance Committee

  

 

LOGO

  

Mr. Foos was Chief Financial Officer of Independence Blue Cross, a health insurance company, from 1989 until his retirement in November 2008. In addition, Mr. Foos currently serves as a director of Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina, a South Carolina-owned and operated health insurance carrier, the HAI Group Companies, a provider of niche insurance programs and services for the public and affordable housing community, and Emerald Shelter Group, anot-for-profit that provides healthcare and affordable housing. Mr. Foos served as a director and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Plan Investment Fund during the past five years and was a director of Transatlantic Holdings, Inc.TransRe prior to March 6, 2012.

 

Mr. Foos’Foos’s qualifications to serve on the Board also include his extensive experience in and knowledge of accounting and finance, which includes service as the Chief Financial Officer of Independence Blue Cross, in addition to his prior experience as a Partner with KPMG LLP and his financial literacy.

Lauren M. Tyler

Age 57

Director since 2019

LOGO

Ms. Tyler has been Head of Human Resources at J.P. Morgan overseeing all aspects of human resources, since 2015. Prior to that, Ms. Tyler was Global Chief Auditor for J.P. Morgan from 2012 to 2015 and Head of Investor Relations from 2009 to 2012.

Ms. Tyler’s qualifications to serve on the Board also include her over 30 years of business experience in banking, finance, and accounting, her experience in private equity and service as a Board member of private companies, and her financial expertise.

 

-26--28-


Other Alleghany Directors

 

Stephen P. BradleyIan H. Chippendale

Age 7470

Director since 2012

Member of the AuditCompensation     Committee

Member of the
Nominating and
Governance Committee

Retiring effective at the

    2016 Annual Meeting

LOGO  

Mr. Bradley is currently the William Ziegler Professor of Business Administration Emeritus at the Harvard Business School where he has been a professor since 1968. In addition, Mr. Bradley currently serves as a director of CRICO/Risk Management Foundation, a medical professional liability carrier. Mr. Bradley was a director of Transatlantic Holdings, Inc. prior to March 6, 2012 and also previously served as a director of CIENA Corp. and i2 Technologies, Inc.

Mr. Bradley’s qualifications to serve on the Board also include his academic experience at the Harvard Business School relating to his work as a professor of competitive and corporate strategy and his considerable experience as a consultant and as a director of public companies.

Ian H. Chippendale

Age 67

Director since 2012

Chairman of the
CompensationGovernance Committee

Term expires in 20172020

  

 

LOGO

  

Mr. Chippendale is the retired Chairman (from September 2003 to December 2006) of RBS Insurance Group, Ltd., an insurance company. In addition, Mr. Chippendale served as a director of HomeServe plc, an insurance company, from January 2007 through March 2015, and was a director of Transatlantic Holdings, Inc.TransRe prior to March 6, 2012.

 

Mr. Chippendale’s qualifications to serve on the Board also include his insurance industry knowledge and his international experience, including his service as the Chairman of RBS Insurance Group, Ltd.

Weston M. Hicks

Age 5962

Director since 2004

Term expires in 20172020

  

 

LOGO

  

Mr. Hicks has been Alleghany’s President and chief executive officer since December 2004. In addition, Mr. Hicks iswas a director of AllianceBernstein Corporation, an investment management and research company.from July 2005 to April 2017.

 

Mr. Hicks’s qualifications to serve on the Board also include his years of experience as an executive in the insurance and financial services industry, particularly his experience as Alleghany’s President and chief executive officer during the past eleven13 years, and his experience as an analyst of propertyandproperty and casualty insurance companies.

-27-


Thomas S. Johnson

Age 75

Director since 1997

    and for 1992-1993

Member of the Compensation     Committee

Member of the

    Nominating and

    Governance Committee

Retiring effective at the

    2016 Annual Meeting

LOGO  

Mr. Johnson was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of GreenPoint Financial Corporation and its subsidiary GreenPoint Bank from 1993 until his retirement on December 31, 2004. Mr. Johnson currently serves as a director of Santander Holdings USA, Inc., a subsidiary of global commercial and retail bank Banco Santander, S.A., and as a director of Santander Bank, N.A., a subsidiary of Santander Holdings USA, Inc. Mr. Johnson previously served as a director of the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation, the Institute of International Education, The Phoenix Companies, Inc., R.R. Donnelly & Sons Company and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.

Mr. Johnson’s qualifications to serve on the Board also include his over 30 years of experience as a financial services industry executive, particularly as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of GreenPoint Financial Corporation, his experience as a member of the boards of directors of other companies and his financial literacy.

Jefferson W. Kirby

Age 5457

Director since 2006

Term expires in 20172020

  

 

LOGO

  

Mr. Kirby has been Chairman of the Board of Alleghany since July 2010. Mr. Kirby has been the Managing Member of Broadfield Capital Management, LLC, an investment advisory services company, since July 2003. Mr. Kirby was a director of Somerset Hills Bancorp, a bank holding company, from 2008 until May 2013. He has served on numerous corporate boards and continues to serve on several charitable boards.

 

Mr. Kirby’s qualifications to serve on the Board also include his over 25 years of experience in financial services and investment management, including his service as a Vice President of Alleghany from 1994 until June 2003 and as an investment manager.

William K. Lavin

Age 7174

Director since 1992

Chairman of the Audit     Committee

Member of the Compensation

    Committee

Term expires in 20182021

  

 

LOGO

  

Mr. Lavin has been a financial consultant since October 1994, and currently serves as a director of Artisanal Brands, Inc., a specialty foods company.

 

Mr. Lavin’s qualifications to serve on the Board also include his business experience as an executive with public and private companies, his extensive experience with public and financial accounting matters for such companies and his financial literacy.

 

-28--29-


Phillip M. Martineau

Age 6871

Director since 2009

Member of the Compensation     Committee

Member of the

Nominating     and

 Governance Committee

Term expires in 20182021

  

LOGO

  

Mr. Martineau was Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Pittsburgh Corning Corporation and Pittsburgh Corning Europe, building materials companies, from June 2005 until his retirement in May 2014. Prior to that, Mr. Martineau was Chief Executive Officer and a director of High Voltage Engineering Corporation, or “High Voltage,” a designer and manufacturer of power control systems, from December 2004 until February 2005. The Board of Directors of High Voltage hired Mr. Martineau as Chief Executive Officer to lead High Voltage through a restructuring under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, which resulted in its sale to Siemens in February 2005.

 

Mr. Martineau’s qualifications to serve on the Board also include his years of executive operational experience with global companies in the materials and manufacturing sectors, particularly his experience as a Chief Executive Officer of such companies, as well as his experience serving on the boards of directors of other companies.

Raymond L.M. Wong

Age 6366

Director since 2006

MemberChairman of the AuditCompensation

    Committee

Member of the CompensationAudit

    Committee

Term expires in 20182021

  

 

LOGO

  

Mr. Wong is currently a Managing Director ofresponsible for private equity at Spring Mountain Capital, LP, an investment management company which he joined in 2007. Prior to that, from 2002 until 2007, Mr. Wong was the Managing Member of DeFee Lee Pond Capital LLC, a financial advisory and private investment company. In addition, Mr. Wong is a director of American Power Groupseveral private companies, including Health Platforms, Inc. (Doctor.com), a healthcare marketing technology company, Hurel Corporation, an energy technologya life sciences tool company, Oncoceutics, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, One Clipboard, Inc. (Splash), an event marketing technology company, RiskSense, Inc., a cybersecurity company, SimpleReach, Inc., a contract marketing technology company, VALC Enterprises, Inc. (Home Captain), a financial technology company, and Hurel Corporation,Vergent BioScience, Inc., a bioanalytic toolsbiotechnology company.

 

Mr. Wong’s qualifications to serve on the Board also include his business experience, particularlywhich includes his 25 years as a managing director in the investment banking group of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., his experience in private equity and service as a Board member of private companies and his financial literacy.expertise.

 

-29--30-


Compensation of Directors

The information under this heading relates to the compensation during 20152018 of thosenon-employee directors who served on the Board at any time during 2015.2018. Employee directors are not separately compensated for their service on the Board.

20152018 Director Compensation

 

Name

  Fees
Earned or  Paid
in Cash
   Stock
Awards(1)
   Total   Fees
Earned or Paid
in Cash
   Stock
Awards(1)
   Total 

Rex D. Adams(2)

  $13,500         $13,500  

Stephen P. Bradley

   107,000    $140,000     247,000  

Karen Brenner

   109,500     140,000     249,500    $117,000   $139,740   $256,740 

Ian H. Chippendale

   100,000     140,000     240,000     107,000    139,740    246,740 

John G. Foos

   107,000     140,000     247,000     112,000    139,740    251,740 

Thomas S. Johnson

   102,000     140,000     242,000  

Jefferson W. Kirby

   145,000     140,000     285,000     190,000    139,740    329,740 

William K. Lavin

   125,000     140,000     265,000     130,000    139,740    269,740 

Phillip M. Martineau

   102,000     140,000     242,000     107,000    139,740    246,740 

Raymond L.M. Wong

   110,000     140,000     250,000     125,000    139,740    264,740 

 

(1)

Represents the grant date fair value of the award of 289234 shares of restricted common stock or 289234 restricted stock units (each equivalent to one share of common stock) made to eachnon-employee director under the 2015 Directors’ Plan on April 27, 2015,30, 2018, and computed in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“ASC 718”). Pursuant to the 2015 Directors’ Plan, the number of shares of restricted common stock or restricted stock units are calculated by dividing the number of shares or restricted stock units equal to $140,000 (as determined by the Board in accordance with the 2015 Directors’ Plan) by the average of the closing sales prices of the common stock on the 30 consecutive trading days preceding the grant date as reported by the NYSE. As of December 31, 2015,2018, each director held either 289234 shares of unvested restricted common stock or 289234 unvested restricted stock units.

(2)Mr. Adams retired as a director in April 2015 and did not receive any awards of restricted stock or restricted stock units during 2015.

Fees Earned or Paid in Cash

Following is information regarding fees earned and paid in cash to directors for service on the Board and its Committees:

 

  Board

  

•   Each independent director other than the ChairmanChair receives an annual retainer of $85,000.$90,000.

 

•  The ChairmanChair receives an annual retainer of $150,000.$190,000.

 

  Audit Committee

  

•  The ChairmanChair receives an annual fee of $30,000.

 

•  Each other member receives an annual fee of $15,000.

 

  Compensation Committee

  

•  The ChairmanChair receives an annual fee of $15,000.$20,000.

 

•  Each other member receives an annual fee of $10,000.

 

  Nominating and Governance Committee

  

•  The ChairmanChair receives an annual fee of $12,000.

 

•  Each other member receives an annual fee of $7,000.

 

 

-30--31-


Stock Awards

Pursuant to the 2015 Directors’ Plan, each year as of the first business day following an annual meeting of stockholders, each individual who was elected re-elected or continues to serve as a member of the Board and who is not an employee of Alleghany or any of its subsidiaries receives, at the individual director’s election, either a number of shares of restricted common stock or restricted stock units (each equivalent to one share of common stock) equal to $140,000 (as determined by the Board in accordance with the 2015 Directors’ Plan) divided by the average of the closing sales prices of the common stock on the 30 consecutive trading days preceding the grant date as reported by the NYSE. Such shares of restricted common stock or restricted stock units, as the case may be, are subject to potential forfeiture until the first annual meeting of stockholders following the date of grant and are subject to restrictions upon transfer until the third anniversary of the date of grant.

On April 27, 2015,30, 2018, each eligible director received either 289234 shares of restricted common stock or 289234 restricted stock units, reflecting such number of shares or restricted stock units equal to $140,000 (as determined by the Board in accordance with the 2015 Directors’ Plan) divided by the average of the closing sales prices of the common stock on the 30 consecutive trading days preceding the grant date as reported by the NYSE. Each director is permitted to defer payment of the restricted stock units, and all whole restricted stock units will be paid in the form of whole shares of common stock.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE NOMINEES TO THE BOARD SET FORTH IN THIS PROPOSAL. PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE SO VOTED UNLESS STOCKHOLDERS SPECIFY A CONTRARY VOTE. EACH NOMINEE SHALL BE ELECTED BY THE AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF A MAJORITY OF THE VOTES CAST WITH RESPECT TO THE ELECTION OF SUCH NOMINEE. A MAJORITY OF VOTES CAST MEANS THE NUMBER OF VOTES CAST “FOR” A NOMINEE’S ELECTION MUST EXCEED THE NUMBER OF VOTES CAST “AGAINST” THE NOMINEE’S ELECTION. ABSTENTIONS AND BROKERNON-VOTES WILL HAVE NO EFFECT ON THE RESULTS OF THIS VOTE.

 

-31--32-


PROPOSAL 2. RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL 20162019

The Audit Committee has selected Ernst & Young LLP, or “E&Y,” as Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2016.2019. Although ratification by stockholders is not a prerequisite to the ability of the Audit Committee to select E&Y as Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee and the Board believe that such ratification is desirable. If stockholders do not ratify the selection of E&Y, the Audit Committee will reconsider its selection of E&Y. The Audit Committee may, however, select E&Y notwithstanding the failure of stockholders to ratify its selection. Alleghany expects that representatives of E&Y will be present at the 20162019 Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

20152018 and 20142017 Fees

The following table summarizes the fees billed for professional audit services rendered by E&Y for the audit of Alleghany’s annual consolidated financial statements for 20152018 and 20142017 and fees for other services rendered by E&Y for 20152018 and 2014.2017.

 

  2015   2014   2018   2017 

Audit Fees

  $4,410,000    $3,809,500    $6,242,191   $5,633,920 

Audit-Related Fees

   49,000     167,000     10,000    39,000 

Tax Fees

        122,345     137,500    142,500 

All Other Fees

                  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $4,459,000    $4,098,845    $6,389,691   $5,815,420 
  

 

   

 

 

The amounts shown for “Audit Fees” represent the aggregate fees for professional services E&Y rendered for the audit of Alleghany’s annual consolidated financial statements for each of the last two fiscal years, the reviews of Alleghany’s financial statements included in its Quarterly Reports on Form10-Q and the services provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings during each of the last two fiscal years. “Audit Fees” also include fees for professional services E&Y rendered for the audit of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. The amounts shown for “Audit-Related Fees” represent the fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for assurance and related services, including regulatory exams, that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of Alleghany’s financial statements and that are not reported under “Audit Fees.” These services include consents and procedures for registration statements and responses to regulatory requests. The amounts shown for “Tax Fees” are forrepresent fees E&Y incurred with respect to tax compliance work related to its review of Alleghany’s federal income tax return, as well as the services performedprovided in conjunction2017 in connection with the tax compliance work related to Alleghany Capital’s acquisition of a foreign tax inspection for years 2011 and prior.majority interest in WWSC Holdings, LLC.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Audit and permissiblenon-audit services that Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm may provide to Alleghany must bepre-approved by the Audit Committee or, between meetings of the Audit Committee, by its Chairman pursuant to authority delegated to him by the Audit Committee. The Chairman reports allpre-approval decisions made by him at the next meeting of the Audit Committee, and he has undertaken to confer with the Audit Committee to the extent that any engagement for which hispre-approval is sought is expected to generate fees for the independent registered public accounting firm in excess of $100,000. When considering the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee considers, among other matters, whether the provision ofnon-audit services by the independent registered public accounting firm to Alleghany is compatible with maintaining the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm. All audit and permissiblenon-audit services rendered in 20152018 and 20142017 werepre-approved pursuant to these procedures.

-33-


THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THIS PROPOSAL. PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE SO VOTED UNLESS STOCKHOLDERS SPECIFY A CONTRARY VOTE. THIS PROPOSAL SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF A MAJORITY OF THE VOTES CAST ON THIS PROPOSAL. ABSTENTIONS AND BROKER NON-VOTES WILL HAVE NO EFFECT ON THE RESULTS OF THIS VOTE. THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROPOSAL IS A ROUTINE PROPOSAL ON WHICH A BROKER OR OTHER NOMINEE IS GENERALLY EMPOWERED TO VOTE IN THE ABSENCE OF VOTING INSTRUCTIONS FROM THE BENEFICIAL OWNER, SO BROKERNON-VOTES

ARE UNLIKELY TO RESULT FROM THIS PROPOSAL.

 

-32--34-


Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee is currently composed of the fivefour independent directors whose names appear at the end of this report. Management is responsible for Alleghany’s internal controls and the financial reporting process. Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of Alleghany’s annual consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and for issuing a report thereon. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and review these processes and the activities of Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee members are not acting as professional accountants or auditors, and their responsibilities are not intended to duplicate or certify the activities of management and the independent registered public accounting firm or to certify the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm under applicable rules.

For fiscal 2015,2018, Ernst & Young LLP acted as Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm. In this context, the Audit Committee has met to review and discuss Alleghany’s audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 20152018 and for the fiscal year then ended, including Alleghany’s specific disclosure under management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations and critical accounting estimates, with management and Ernst & Young LLP. The Audit Committee has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standard No. 16, “Communications with Audit Committees,” issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or the “PCAOB.” Ernst & Young LLP reported to the Audit Committee regarding the critical accounting estimates and practices and the estimates and assumptions used by management in the preparation of the audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 20152018 and for the fiscal year then ended, all alternative treatments of financial information within generally accepted accounting principles that have been discussed with management, the ramifications of use of such alternative treatments and the treatment preferred by Ernst & Young LLP.

Ernst & Young LLP provided a report to the Audit Committee describing Ernst & Young LLP’s internal quality-control procedures and related matters. Ernst & Young LLP also provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures and the letter required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding Ernst & Young LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee discussed with Ernst & Young LLP its independence. When considering Ernst Young LLP’s independence, the Audit Committee considered, among other matters, whether Ernst & Young LLP’s provision ofnon-audit services to Alleghany is compatible with maintaining the independence of Ernst & Young LLP. All audit and permissiblenon-audit services in 20152018 and 20142017 werepre-approved pursuant to these procedures.

Based on the reviews and discussions with management and Ernst & Young LLP referred to above, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 20152018 and for the fiscal year then ended be included in Alleghany’s Annual Report on Form10-K for such fiscal year.

William K. Lavin

Stephen P. Bradley

Karen Brenner

John G. Foos

Raymond L.M. Wong

Audit Committee of the Board of Directors

 

-33--35-


PROPOSAL 3. ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are providing stockholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on the 20152018 compensation we paid to the executive officers who are named in the Summary Compensation Table on page 54,59, also referred to as our “Named Executive Officers.” For 2015,2018, Weston M. Hicks, Joseph P. Brandon, Christopher K. Dalrymple, Roger B. Gorham and John L. Sennott, Jr. were our Named Executive Officers.

Please read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 3739 of this Proxy Statement as well as the Summary Compensation Table and other related compensation tables, notes and narrative appearing on pages 5459 through 6972 of this proxy statement,Proxy Statement, which provide detailed information on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers for 2015.2018.

For a discussion of the results of past advisory votes on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers and the Compensation Committee’s response to such results, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Compensation—Compensation Committee Process — Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation” on page 44.49.

The Compensation Committee and the Board believe that Alleghany’s 20152018 executive compensation program was designed appropriately and ensured that management’s interests were aligned with the interests of Alleghany stockholders. Accordingly, we are asking our stockholders to vote in favor of the following advisory resolution at the 20162019 Annual Meeting:

RESOLVED, that the stockholders of Alleghany Corporation (“Alleghany”) approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of Alleghany’s named executive officers as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Securities and Exchange Commission RegulationS-K in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table, and the related compensation tables, notes and narrative set forth in the proxy statement for Alleghany’s 20162019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Although this advisory vote, commonly referred to as “say-on-pay,“say-on-pay, is not binding on Alleghany, the Compensation Committee or the Board, the Board and the Compensation Committee will review and consider the voting results when making future decisions about our executive compensation program.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THIS PROPOSAL. PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE SO VOTED UNLESS STOCKHOLDERS SPECIFY A CONTRARY VOTE. THIS PROPOSAL SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF A MAJORITY OF THE VOTES CAST ON THIS PROPOSAL. ABSTENTIONS AND BROKERNON-VOTES WILL HAVE NO EFFECT ON THE RESULTS OF THIS VOTE.

 

-34--36-


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has met to review and discuss with Alleghany’s management the specific disclosure contained under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 37.39. Based on its review and discussions with management regarding such disclosure, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference in Alleghany’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.2018.

Raymond L.M. Wong

Ian H. Chippendale

Thomas S. Johnson

William K. Lavin

Phillip M. Martineau

Raymond L.M. Wong

Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors

 

-35--37-


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

37

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

37

2015 Compensation Program Summary

  39

2018 Compensation Program Summary

  43

Alleghany Performance in 20152018

  4045

Alleghany Long-Term Performance

  4145

Compensation Committee Process

  4348

Compensation Determination Timetable

  4348

Compensation Committee Advisors and Services

  4348

Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

  4449

Elements of 20152018 Compensation

  4549

Salary

  4550

Annual Cash Incentive Compensation

  4651

Long-Term Equity-Based Incentive Compensation

  5054

Performance Shares

  5055

Restricted Stock Units

  5156

Perquisites

  5156

Deferred Compensation Plan

  5156

Retirement Plan

  5256

Financial Statement Restatements

  5257

Hedging and Pledging Policies

  5257

Executive Officer Stock Ownership Guidelines

  5257

Tax Considerations

  5257

Compensation Policies and Practices Relating to Risk Management

  5358

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

  5459

Summary Compensation Table

  5459

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 20152018

  5761

Narrative Discussion Relating to the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

  5862

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20152018 FiscalYear-End

  6264

20152018 Stock Vested

  6365

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

63

Pension Benefits

  65

Pension Benefits

  67

Payments Upon Termination of Employment

  69
67

CEO Pay Ratio

  71

 

-36--38-


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Dear Alleghany Stockholder,

Due to SEC proxy rules and regulations, most of the compensation information contained in the Summary Compensation PhilosophyTable on page 59 was set back in January of 2018, and Objectivesthe analysis and determinations regarding such information also look backwards to that time. Before turning to that historical information, we thought it would be helpful to first discuss Alleghany’s overall corporate structure and philosophy, how that philosophy and structure inform our executive compensation program and the results of a review we did during 2018 of our compensation process and program. The results of this review informed decisions we made with respect to compensation for 2019.

On a group-wide basis, Alleghany has over 9,000 employees. Yet at the parent-level, Alleghany is managed by a small group of professionals consisting of four executive officers and 15 officers. This small team is responsible foroverseeing, not operating, Alleghany’s subsidiaries; making capital allocation decisions; managing Alleghany’s group-wide investment portfolios; and managing financial reporting, legal and compliance functions and other public company obligations. With respect to our subsidiaries, the parent-company does not run them on aday-to-day basis — their subsidiary executive teams do. Instead, the parent company’s small professional team provides our subsidiaries with strategic guidance, sets risk parameters, and ensures that management incentives are appropriate.

Alleghany’s extensive history and focus on its long-term legacy inform our culture, strategy and compensation. From a culture perspective, although we must offer competitive compensation, we do not seek to compete for executive talent solely on the basis of compensation. We also compete by offering a unique professional opportunity to work in a high integrity environment where the focus is on building stockholder value over the very long term. Our collaborative, team-oriented culture is a key driver of retention. Our retention efforts, which include compensation aspects, result in parent-level employees with long tenures, which fits with our long-term financial results orientation.

From a strategic perspective, Alleghany’s long-term value proposition is to make a reasonable return in good times and preserve capital in bad times. We have an aversion to doing things which, although they may have the potential for significant gain, also bring with them greater chance of a permanent loss of capital. With that in mind, our financial objective in the current economic environment is to grow our common stockholders’ equity per share at ratesa rate of7-10% over the long term without employing excessive amounts of financial leverage and without taking imprudent risks. Through our executive

Our compensation program we intendis designed to provide compensation to our Named Executive Officersthe parent company professional team that is aligned with the above objective. Alleghany’s executives are primarily compensated through annual cash compensation, consisting of salary and an annual incentive opportunity, and a long-term plan which provides annual awards of performance shares and restricted stock units. With respect to annual incentive opportunities, we generally think of annual incentive compensation as variable pay linked to the achievement of strategic and operational objectives by management during the year and not “incentive” pay intended to send strong messages about performance differences based on a rigid formulaic approach. Our annual incentive awards are capped and not the most meaningful part of management compensation. After completing our corporate financial objective. Our2018 review and considering a number of alternative approaches, we concluded that, in Alleghany’s current configuration, the existing structure of our annual incentive compensation program, with its funding occurring only upon generation of positive earnings, its capped upside, and our ability to adjust payouts in light of our evaluation of Alleghany performance and individual contributions, remains the optimal approach and is meantin the best interests of Alleghany and its stockholders.

With respect to long-term incentive compensation, executive awards are made primarily in the form of performance shares, and these awards comprise a significant amount of our executive compensation.

-39-


Since 2003, performance share payouts have been based on management’s ability to grow common stockholders’ equity per share relative to Alleghany’s cost of equity capital, an approach we believe aligns executive compensation with the returns provided to Alleghany’s long-term owners. If Alleghany suffers a decline in common stockholders’ equity per share in any one year, like it did in 2018, it (i) negatively impacts all outstanding performance share awards, (ii) reduces or eliminates the number of performance shares that are paid out, and (iii) because the stock price is likely to be lower than it would have been without a decline in common stockholders’ equity in that one year, the dollar value of any shares earned is reduced even further. In this regard, we note that for the performance share award period 2015-2018 which just ended,management did not achieve the threshold performance necessary for any payout of performance shares, which we believe is evidence that they are held fully accountable for Alleghany’s longer-term financial results.

With respect to our focus on common stockholders’ equity per share as the metric for performance share awards, after concluding our 2018 review, we continue to believe that this metric is the most appropriate yardstick against which management’s performance should be measured. Over long periods of time (a decade or more), Alleghany’s stock price has tended to grow at the same rate as the growth rate of its common stockholders’ equity per share. Over shorter time-periods, however, the two can move in very different directions, due to general market sentiment and changes in investor expectations about the future relative growth rate of Alleghany’s common stockholders’ equity per share compared to other alternatives in the stock market. Although we provide reasonable amountsa substantial percentage of compensation weighted towardsto our executive officers through stock-based vehicles, we do not believe in linking the number of performance shares earned to stock price performance, or reducing the number of performance shares earned in the event that the stock price performance is negative.

We see three primary issues with using stock price as a specific performance metric in incentive plans. First, a company’s stock price may move up or down over short periods of time (less than five years) due to cyclical trends in its industry, changes in investor preferences, or other reasons that are unrelated to a company’s performance. Second, a company’s risk profile may not be adequately tested over short periods of time. If a stockholder invests in a company for long-term growth in capital, it is imperative that the company not suffer a permanent loss. Management in an insurance or reinsurance holding company can produce what may appear to be good short-term results, either by encouraging premium growth through more aggressive pricing or taking more “tail risk” in its operations. The negative effects of such actions may not show up over short periods of time, but time is the enemy of the imprudent risk taker. Eventually companies are tested, and it is only then that a stockholder finds out how well management has controlled risk. Third, extreme stock market moves can produce perverse results, even if measured on a relative basis. A stock market bubble can reward management when an increasing share price overcomes the impact of poor financial performance. Similarly, a stock market crash can penalize management when excellent financial performance is masked by share price declines unrelated to the company. Relative performance can be impacted by short-term volatility more so than steady, long-term results.

In sum, we believe that Alleghany’s approach to holding company executive compensation is timeless and effective. It is designed to incentivize performance over the long-term and link executives’ interests with those of Alleghany’s long-term stockholders. We believe that the program, although we may refine it in the future as circumstances or needs warrant, is effective in achieving our strategic objectives and aligns management’s interests with those of all of Alleghany’s stockholders.

Sincerely

Raymond L.M. Wong

Ian H. Chippendale

William K. Lavin    

Phillip M. Martineau

Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors

-40-


Review of Executive Compensation Process and Program in 2018

After passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, or the “TCJA,” and due to certain internal considerations, the Compensation Committee determined to conduct a review of the primary components of Alleghany’s parent-level compensation program to ensure that it continued to support the objectives and principles discussed above on pages 39 and 40. As part of this, the Compensation Committee considered changes to annual incentive compensation, long-term incentive compensation, and the peer companies we reference below when thinking about compensation and performance. Results of this review are set out in further detail below.

As part of its review, in June 2018, after a competitive process, the Compensation Committee selected Semler Brossy Consulting Group, LLC, or “Semler Brossy,” as its new compensation consultant. In making this selection, the Compensation Committee reviewed and assessed Semler Brossy’s independence as a firm and the individuals providing advice to the Compensation Committee and determined that the firm and its relevant individual advisors were independent.

At the direction of the Compensation Committee, Semler Brossy reviewed Alleghany’s executive compensation program and process, including by meeting with the Compensation Committee and members of management. At the Compensation Committee’s September 2018 meeting, Semler Brossy summarized its initial findings, reporting that it did not believe there was a need to make significant changes to Alleghany’s existing compensation program. However, Semler Brossy suggested a few refinements for consideration to ensure that the compensation program continued to align with Alleghany’s strategy, culture and range of appropriate competitive practices. The Compensation Committee asked that Semler Brossy work with management during the remainder of 2018 to consider such possible refinements, including peer group development, design of the annual incentive plan and objectives thereof, the structure of Alleghany’s long-term incentive plan and metrics thereof and various program governance and related items. After the completion of such work, the Compensation Committee determined the following with respect to certain aspects of Alleghany’s executive compensation program.

TCJA and Performance-Linked Pay

Despite the elimination of tax benefits for performance-based pay under the TCJA, the Compensation Committee determined that linking a substantial portion of executive annual compensation to performance continued to be appropriate and in the best interests of Alleghany and its stockholders.

Annual Incentive Plan

No change was made to the current structure of executive annual incentive awards under the 2015 Management Incentive Plan, or the “2015 MIP.” Although the Compensation Committee analyzed and discussed various changes, including adding an explicit quantitative metric to annual performance goals for executives, the Compensation Committee ultimately determined, as discussed on page 39, that the current approach to annual incentive compensation was appropriate at this time and in the best interests of Alleghany and its stockholders.

Long-Term Incentive Plan    

After reviewing and discussing analyses at its 2018 meetings and January 2019 meeting, the Compensation Committee determined that Alleghany’s long-term incentive program was generally well-structured and suited to support the strategic objective of growing common stockholders’ equity per share7-10% over the long-term without taking imprudent risks. The Compensation Committee did determine to refine its approach to long-term incentives with the following revisions for 2019 awards:

Form of Long-Term Incentive Awards for Mr. Hicks and Mr. Brandon. Historically, Mr. Hicks’s and Mr. Brandon’s long-term incentive opportunities were denominated solely in performance shares, the payout of

-41-


which is based on achievement of the specified performance goal of growth in common stockholders’ equity per share, while such opportunities for Mr. Sennott and Mr. Dalrymple were dividedtwo-thirds in performance shares andone-third in time-based restricted stock units which cliff-vest four years from the date of grant. For 2019, Mr. Hicks’s and Mr. Brandon’s long-term incentive opportunities have been divided 75% in the form of performance shares and 25% in the form of restricted stock units. This change was made in order to help further balance risk in our long-term incentive program and maintain a focus on rewarding longer-term performance. In making this decision, the Compensation Committee also considered factors including peer group and general industry market practice, as well as grant practices for other members of Alleghany management.

Performance Share Award Period. Historically, payouts of performance shares awards were based solely on the growth in common stockholders’ equity per share over a single four-year performance period. The Compensation Committee determined to adjust the awards beginning in 2019 (outstanding awards will not be adjusted) so that performance periods were staggered such that 25% will be paid out based on a three-year performance period (January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2020), 50% will be paid out based on a four-year performance period (January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021) and 25% will be paid out based on a five-year performance period (January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2022). This staggered payout schedule avoids the “cliff effect” at the end of any particular four-year award period which can, in certain circumstances, turn a long-term plan into a short-term plan and incent unwanted behavior.

Peer Group

As part of its review of the Company’s executive compensation program, Semler Brossy also developed a peer group of companies that might compete with us for executive talent to be used for market comparison purposes. Although we do not seek to set our executive compensation primarily based on performanceany benchmarks or peer group, we believe that information regarding pay levels and practices at other companies is nevertheless useful in two respects. First, we recognize that our compensation levels and practices must be competitive in the marketplace. Second, independent marketplace information is one of the many factors that we consider in assessing the reasonableness of compensation. In this regard, in considering compensation for the Named Executive Officers for 2019, the Compensation Committee considered comparative market data from the following peer companies identified by Semler Brossy:

Arch Capital Group Ltd.

Markel CorporationThe Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.

Axis Capital Holdings Limited

Old Republic International Corporation    Validus Holdings Ltd.

Cincinnati Financial Corporation    

Reinsurance Group of America, Inc.XL Group Ltd.

CNA Financial Corporation

RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd.

Everest Re Group, Ltd.

The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.W.R. Berkley Corporation

This peer group was developed to reflect publicly traded companies that generally as a group (i) approximate our scope of business and that of our subsidiaries, including revenue and market capitalization, (ii) are cappedsimilar to us in the importance to their business of capital allocation, investments and risk management, (iii) compete with us for a reasonable upside to discourage imprudent risk taking or misaligned incentives.

For 2015, this compensation philosophy was evidencedcomparable pool of executive talent, and (iv) reflect our global presence. The peer companies identified by Semler Brossy were the same as those identified by the followingCompensation Committee’s former compensation highlights:consultant other than replacing Progressive Corporation and Erie Indemnity Company with The Hanover Insurance Group and The Hartford Financial Services Group.

 

-42-


CEO2018 Compensation Program Summary

2018 total direct compensation (salary, annual incentive and long-term equity based awards) was $6.7 million, representing less than 0.9% of 2015 pre-tax earnings and approximately 0.1% of 2015 revenues, and total direct compensationin aggregate for our Named Executive Officers as a group was $17.1 million, representing approximately 2.4% of 2015 pre-tax earnings and approximately 0.4% of 2015 revenues.

85% of Mr. Hicks’s total direct compensation for 2015 was linked to performance, while performance-linked compensation for our other Named Executive Officers averaged 74% of total direct compensation in 2015.

Mr. Hicks’s 2015 total direct compensation decreased by 10% from 2014 total direct compensation, due to a lower annual incentive payout for 2015.

Annual incentive plan awards included a financial objective but also discretion given the nature of Alleghany’s business and long-term approach, with the discretionary aspect being restricted by the fact that payouts for 2015 were limited to the lesser of (i) approximately $5.7 million (representing the maximum potential payout for our Named Executive Officers as a group) or (ii) 3% of 2015 annual adjusted pre-tax earnings, if less than $5.7 million.

Long-term performance share awards were subject to goals that we believed would be challenging to meet in today’s low interest rate and volatile market environment and that are aligned with our corporate financial objective of long-term growth in book value, with no payout being made if threshold performance is not achieved, and with our CEO’s long-term incentives based 100% on performance.

Further, over the past three years, the Compensation Committee and the Board have taken the following actions, among others, to improve our executive compensation program and further align it with the interests of our stockholders:

freezing the Retirement Plan due to its retention benefits being outweighed by its significant benefit obligations and lack of a pay-for-performance element;

eliminating the Executive Post-Retirement Medical Plan (which provided post-retirement health insurance reimbursement benefits) for cost-control purposes and lack of a pay-for-performance element;

increasing the book value growth performance thresholds (described on page 51) and eliminating an adjustment for performance relative to the S&P 500 Index for long-term incentive awards;

adjusting Mr. Hicks’s compensation mix to be more tied to performance-based components, particularly long-term, performance-based equity awards, while keeping his total direct compensation substantially flat during this period; and

re-establishing the concept of “target” and “maximum” opportunities for annual incentive awards.

-37-


Finally, we believe the following practices further align our compensation program with our stockholders’ interests:

What We Do

Our Incentive Awards are “Capped”

•  Individual awards under our short and long-term incentive plans are “capped” at 150% of target and performance goals are set at realistic levels to eliminate the potential for unintended windfalls and to avoid encouraging the use of excessive financial leverage or taking of imprudent risks.

Robust Stock Ownership Guidelines

•  We require our officers to own a substantial amount of our common stock, including five times base salary for Mr. Hicks, to ensure that they maintain a significant stake in our long-term success. In addition, our Named Executive Officers have significant exposure to Alleghany through unvested performance shares and, for

some of our Named Executive Officers, shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units, the value of which is tied to the market price of our common stock.

We can “Claw Back” Compensation

•  We have in place a compensation clawback policy applicable to our Named Executive Officers to further discourage imprudent risk taking.

We Limit Perquisites to Insignificant Amounts

•  Our general practice is to not provide perquisites or other personal benefits to our Named Executive Officers. In 2015, no Named Executive Officer received more than $10,000 in perquisites or other personal benefits.

Independent Compensation Consultant

•  The Compensation Committee retains an independent compensation consulting firm which provides no other services to Alleghany.

What We Don’t Do

No Stock Options

•  We do not grant stock options.

No Accelerated Vesting of Performance
Shares upon Termination or a Change-in-Control

•  Performance share and restricted stock awards under long-term incentive plans do not provide for accelerated vesting in the event of a termination of employment by Alleghany, other than on a pro-rated basis for performance shares based on Alleghany performance through date of termination in the event of a termination without cause.

•  Awards under our short and long-term incentive plans do not provide for accelerated vesting upon a change-in-control.

No Hedging or Pledging of Stock

•  We have in place a policy applicable to our Named Executive Officers that prohibits them from hedging or pledging Alleghany securities they hold.

-38-


2015 Compensation Program Summary

2015 total direct compensation (salary, annual incentive and long-term equity based awards) for our Named Executive Officers are summarized below.

 

Annual
Compensation
Component
  Key Features/Purpose  

Aggregate Amounts

Involved

Salary  

Provides a fixed amount of cash compensation.

 

The Compensation Committee generally makes salary adjustments annually, based on salaries for the prior year, general inflation, individual performance and internal comparability considerations.

  

 

LOGOLOGO

Annual Cash Incentives

  

Provides apay-for-performance component for achievementif Alleghany generates positive earnings, based on an evaluation of shorter-term objectives,Alleghany’s performance and individual contributions, with individual awards “capped” at approximately 150% of target.

 

The Compensation Committee determines individual results for participants and payouts based on overall financial and operational performance of management.

  LOGO

LOGO

Long-Term Equity-Based Incentives  

Performance Shares: Providespay-for-performance component focused on achievement of longer-term financial objective of increasing book value per share at rates of7-10% over the long term without employing excessive amounts of financial leverage and without taking imprudent risks. Individual performance share awards are “capped” at 150% of target.

 

Awards made in February 2015January 2018 pay out to participants based on the average annual compound growth in our book value per share from the award date throughyear-end 2018, 2021, with growth at 7% paying out at target, growth at 9% paying out at maximum and growth below 5% paying zero.

 

Restricted Stock Units:Grants of restricted stock units to our chief financial officer and General Counsel provide a retention element of total compensation and incent the prudence we desire them to have in their respective roles.

 

The value of such awards depends on the market price of our common stock. The awards cliff-vest four years from date of grant.

  

LOGO

LOGO
  Total 2015Aggregate NEO Salary, Annual Incentive and LTIP Award2018 Direct Compensation Amount = $17.1$18.4 million

-43-


We believe the following practices further align our compensation program with our stockholders’ interests:

 

Compensation Practices Highlights

Our Incentive Awards are “Capped”

•  Individual awards under our short- and long-term incentive plans are “capped” at 150% of target and performance goals are set at levels high enough to encourage strong performance but still reasonably attainable to avoid encouraging the use of excessive financial leverage or taking of imprudent risks.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

•  We require our officers to own our common stock, including five times base salary for Mr. Hicks, four times base salary for Mr. Brandon and three times base salary for Mr. Dalrymple and Mr. Sennott, to ensure that they maintain a significant stake in our long-term success. In addition, our Named Executive Officers have significant exposure to Alleghany through unvested performance shares and, for some of our Named Executive Officers, shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units, the value of which is tied to the market price of our common stock.

We Can “Claw Back” Compensation

•  We have in place a compensation clawback policy applicable to our Named Executive Officers to further discourage imprudent risk taking.

We Limit Perquisites to Insignificant Amounts

•  Our general practice is to not provide perquisites or other personal benefits to our Named Executive Officers. In 2018, no Named Executive Officer received more than $10,000 in perquisites or other personal benefits.

Independent Compensation Consultant

•  The Compensation Committee retains an independent compensation consulting firm which provides no other services to Alleghany.

No Stock Options

•  We do not grant stock options.

No Accelerated Vesting of Performance
Shares Upon Termination or aChange-in-Control

•  Performance share and restricted stock awards under long-term incentive plans do not provide for accelerated vesting in the event of a termination of employment by Alleghany, other than on apro-rated basis for performance shares based on Alleghany performance throughyear-end immediately preceding the date of termination in the event of a termination without cause.

•  Awards under our short- and long-term incentive plans do not provide for accelerated vesting orgross-ups upon achange-in-control.

No Hedging or Pledging of Stock

•  We have in place a policy applicable to our Named Executive Officers that prohibits them from hedging or pledging Alleghany securities they hold.

-39-

-44-


In addition to the salary, annual cash incentives and long-term equity-based incentives described above, our Named Executive Officers receive an annual savings benefit under Alleghany’s deferred compensation plan, or the “Deferred Compensation Plan,” in an amount equal to 15% of base salary. Our Named Executive Officers who have completed five years of service with Alleghany or a subsidiary of Alleghany are eligible to receive a benefit under a retirement plan. Effective December 31, 2013, the retirement plan was closed to new participants, and no additional benefits for existing participants have accrued after such date.

Alleghany Performance in 20152018

 

4.4% increase inCommon stockholders’ equity per share was $527.75 as of December 31, 2018, a decrease of 4.6% from common stockholders’ equity per share as of December 31, 2017. Adding back the March 2018 $10.00 per share special dividend to $486.02 at 2015 year-end from $465.51 at 2014 year-end, summarized2018 common stockholders’ equity per share results in more detail ina decrease of 2.8% for the following table (dollars in millions):full year.

   TransRe  RSUI  Other(1)  Total 

Beginning equity

  $5,130   $1,587   $756   $7,473  

Operating income

   408    148    (48  508  

Net realized gains, after tax

   94    54    (9  139  

Impairment losses, after tax

   (46  (15  (26  (87
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net earnings

   456    187    (83  560  

Other changes(2)

   (126  (58  (50  (234

Capital transactions

   (250  (150  156    (244
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Ending equity

   5,210    1,566    779    7,555  

Operating Return on Equity

   7.9  9.3  (6.3)%   6.8

Growth in book value(3)

   6.4  8.1  (18.4)%   4.3

Growth in book value per share

      4.4

(1)CapSpecialty, Inc., or “CapSpecialty,” Pacific Compensation Corporation, or “PacificComp,” corporate assets, and Alleghany Capital Corporation, or “Alleghany Capital,” investments, net of holding company debt.

(2)Principally the change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments, net of tax.

(3)Dividends and share repurchases added back to ending equity.

 

Net earnings of $560.3$39.5 million in 2015,2018, compared with $679.2$90.1 million in 2014,2017, primarily reflecting higher other-than-temporary impairment lossesa lower income tax benefit in 20152018 compared with 2014.2017.

 

Consolidated Alleghany underwriting profit of $466.6 million in 2015,Earnings per diluted share and operating earnings per diluted share were $2.62 and $16.13, respectively, for the year-ended December 31, 2018, compared with $494.8 million in 2014,earnings per diluted share and a consolidated combined ratiooperating earnings per diluted share of 89.0% in 2015, compared with 88.8% in 2014, reflecting continued positive underwriting results at TransRe$5.85 and RSUI.$2.87, respectively, for the year-ended December 31, 2017.

 

TransRe and RSUI, which together account for 90%A consolidated net pre-tax underwriting loss of our consolidated stockholders’ equity, produced high single-digit returns on equity on an operating basis (excluding$161.5 million in 2018, compared with a net realized capital gains orpre-tax underwriting loss of $316.4 million in 2017. The 2018 underwriting loss included current year pre-tax catastrophe losses and other-than-temporary impairment charges). Investment returns, however, were weakof $657.7 million, compared with $818.1 million of current year pre-tax catastrophe losses in 2015 resulting in slightly lower growth in book value for each company relative to the return on equity, which is consistent with the lackluster performance of all investment classes generally in 2015.2017.

 

The results for the “Other” column primarily reflect: (1) the relative underperformanceOutperformance by Alleghany’s equity and fixed income portfolios of CapSpecialty and PacificComp (although each company improved significantly in 2015); (2) operating losses at Stranded Oil Resources Corporation; and (3) investments held for their total return (mostly equities) where dividend income is less than the cost of holding company debt.investment benchmarks.

 

A 77.1% increase in noninsurance revenue increased for the year-ended December 31, 2018, with record earning and double-digit return on invested capital at Alleghany made progress in building Alleghany Capital’s portfolio of non-financial business investments by acquiring IPS.Capital.

 

-40-Completion by Alleghany Capital of its acquisition of Concord, along with strengthening of other Alleghany platform companies through several, complementary, bolt-on acquisitions.

Additional information regarding Alleghany’s 2018 results, including audited consolidated financial statements, as well as MD&A with respect to 2018 results, is contained in the Form10-K, which was filed with the SEC on February 20, 2019. Readers are encouraged to review the Form10-K for a more complete discussion of Alleghany’s financial performance.


Alleghany Long-Term Performance

We believe that Alleghany’s performance is best measured over the long term, and that long-term growth in common stockholders’ equity per share is the best metric for evaluating such performance. In this regard, the table below shows the annual, and three- andten-year average rolling, annualized growth in our common stockholders’ equity per share, adjusted for a 2018 cash dividend and historical stock dividends, during the five-year period from December 31, 20102013 to December 31, 2015:2018:

 

   Common
Stockholders’

Equity
Per Share($)(1)
   Annual
Growth
       
      Rolling Annualized Average 

Year

     Three-Year  Ten-Year 

2010

   325.31     10.4    5.0    8.7  

2011

   342.12     5.2    8.6    7.7  

2012

   379.13     10.8    8.7    8.8  

2013

   412.96     8.9    8.3    8.5  

2014

   465.51     12.7    10.8    8.6  

2015

   486.02     4.4    8.6    8.6  

Average

     8.7  8.3  8.5

(1)Adjusted for subsequent stock dividends
   Common
Stockholders’
Equity
Per Share($)
   Annual
Return(%)
         
   Rolling Annualized Average(%) 

Year

  Three-Year   Ten-Year 

2013

   412.96    8.9    8.3    8.5 

2014

   465.51    12.7    10.8    8.6 

2015

   486.02    4.4    8.6    8.6 

2016

   515.24    6.0    7.7    7.8 

2017

   553.20    7.4    5.9    7.0 

2018

   527.75    (2.8   3.4    7.2 

Average

     6.1    7.5    8.0 

As can be seen in the table above, Alleghany’s common stockholders’ equity per share has compounded over the various time metricsthree- andten-year periods in the mid-rangerange of Alleghany’s stated financialstrategic objective of7-10% annual growth in common stockholders’ equity per share.share, although it trailed that objective in 2018 and the three-year periods ending in 2017 and 2018 primarily due to a decline in the market value of Alleghany’s equity portfolio in December 2018 and significant catastrophe losses in 2017 and 2018.

-45-


The chart below summarizes Alleghany’s common stockholders’ equity per share growth and stock price performance over theten-year period from December 31, 20052008 to December 31, 2015,2018, compared with the S&P 500, with all values indexed to December 31, 2005.2008. During thisten-year period, Alleghany’s common stockholders’ equity per share increased at a compound annual rate of 8.6%7.2% (adjusted for dividends), compared with a compound annual rate of return of 7.3%13.1% for the S&P 500, and the price of Alleghany common stock (adjusted for stock dividends) appreciated at a 6.6%9.1% compound annual rate of return.

 

 

LOGOLOGO

-41-


As indicated by the data presented in the chart above, Alleghany’s growth in common stockholders’ equity per share has been relatively consistent.consistent, with the exception of 2018 when it was negatively impacted by a decline in the market value of Alleghany’s equity portfolio and significant catastrophe losses. The trading price of Alleghany’s common stock has been more volatile, reflecting the volatility of the stock market in general. In Alleghany’s view, growth in common stockholders’ equity per share is a better measure of fundamental performance and value creation as compared to the more volatile trading price of Alleghany’s common stock. As such, Alleghany focuses its executive compensation incentive program on building common stockholders’ equity per share over time. As is shown

-46-


During theten-year performance period set out in the chart, Alleghany’s growth in common stockholders’ equity per share has exceeded that of the S&P 500 return over the past ten years and is considerably less volatile.

During this same ten-year period,graph on page 46, we believe that Mr. Hicks’s compensation has been well-aligned with Alleghany’s long-term performance as can be seen in the table below.

10-yearPay-TSR(1) Alignment

10-year Pay-TSR(1) Alignment

($ in thousands)

LOGO

 

                                   CAGR 

Year

 2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  1 Year  3 Year  10 Year 

CEO Total Compensation(2)

  3,781    4,566    6,522    6,435    6,206    5,636    7,347    7,332    6,216    10,543    6,869    (34.8%)   (2.1%)   6.2

Pension Value Increase/(Decrease)

  850    856    1,160    1,594    1,066    822    1,922    1,259    (1,232  2,914    (23   

CEO SCT Compensation Excluding Pension(3)

  2,931    3,710    5,361    4,840    5,140    4,814    5,425    6,072    7,448    7,629    6,892    (9.7%)   4.3  8.9

Indexed TSR

  100    131    147    105    105    119    113    133    159    184    189    3.1  12.5  6.6

TSR vs. CEO Compensation (excl. pension) Increases / Decreases

  

  12.8%   8.2  (2.3%) 

Indexed BVPS Growth

  100    115    132    126    139    153    161    178    194    219    228    4.4  8.6  8.6

BVPS vs. CEO Compensation (excl. pension) Increases / Decreases

  

  14.1%   4.3  (0.3%) 

LOGO

  Year  CAGR 
  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  1 Year  3 Year  10 Year(5) 

CEO Total Compensation(3)

  6,435   6,206   5,636   7,347   7,332   6,216   10,543   6,869   8,573   9,647   7,573   (21.5%)   3.3  1.6

Pension Value Increase/(Decrease)

  1,594   1,066   822   1,922   1,259   (1,232  2,914   (23  946   1,844   (556   

CEO SCT Compensation Excluding Pension(2)

  4,840   5,140   4,814   5,425   6,072   7,448   7,629   6,892   7,627   7,803   8,129   4.2  5.7  5.3

Indexed TSR

  100   100   113   107   126   151   174   180   229   224   238   6.3  9.9  9.1

TSR vs. CEO Compensation (excl. pension) Increases / (Decreases)

 

  2.1  4.2  3.8

Indexed BVPS Growth(4)

  100   110   122   128   142   155   174   182   193   207   201   (2.8%)   3.4  7.2

BVPS vs. CEO Compensation (excl. pension) Increases / (Decreases)

 

  (7.0%)   (2.2%)   1.9

 

(1)

Total Shareholder Return reflects Alleghany share price appreciation including the impact of stock and cash dividends.

(2)

Represents CEO compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 59, excluding annual fluctuation in pension value.

(3)

Includes annual fluctuation in pension value. Calculated according to SEC rules except for 2013, 2015 and 2015,2018, which include a negative value for Mr. Hicks’s pension benefit. SEC rules require that negative pension value changes are reflected as a “zero” in table.

(4)

BVPS growth includes the table.impact of stock and cash dividends.

(5)

Total Shareholder Return for this period reflects that the price of Alleghany common stock was 99% of stockholders’ equity per share on December 31, 2008, compared with 118% on December 31, 2018.

 

(3)Represents CEO compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 54, excluding annual fluctuation in pension value.

-47-

-42-


Compensation Committee Process

Compensation Determination Timetable

General Setting of Salary and Incentive Awards

Salary adjustments for the coming year and new incentive awards are generally made annually by the Compensation Committee at aits regularly scheduled January meeting or meetings. At its meetings in January. In 2015,January 2018, the Compensation Committee determined 20152018 salaries, and 20152018 annual incentive awards at its January 2015 meetingaward opportunities and 2015-20182018-2021 long-term incentive awards at a meeting in early February 2015 for all of the Named Executive Officers. These meetingsThis meeting followed the January 20152018 Board meeting, at which the Board reviewed and discussed:

 

an evaluation of preliminary 20142017 financial results for Alleghany;

 

an evaluation of Mr. Hicks’s 20142017 performance and priorities for 2015;2018;

 

a report by Mr. Hicks on management succession and development throughout Alleghany;

 

the recommendation of Mr. Hicks regarding the individual performance of each Named Executive Officer; and

 

Alleghany’s projections and plan for 20152018 through 2017.2020.

Setting of Mr. Hicks’s 20152018 Compensation

In determining Mr. Hicks’s 20152018 compensation, the Compensation Committee at its January 20152018 meeting reviewed Mr. Hicks’s 20142017 performance and 20152018 priorities, as described above, as well as all components of Mr. Hicks’s 20142017 compensation, including annual salary, annual cash incentive compensation in respect of 2014,2017, outstanding performance share awards, values of previous awards of restricted stock and benefits under Alleghany’s Deferred Compensation Plan, Alleghany’s medical, long-term disability and other employee welfare plans and the freezing of Alleghany’sthe Retirement Plan atyear-end 2013. After this review and the Compensation Committee’s consideration of input from its compensation consultant at the time, Frederic W. Cook & Co. Inc., or “F.W. Cook,” the Committee determined to increase Mr. Hicks’s 2018: (i) salary to $1,030,000 from $1,000,000, (ii) target annual incentive opportunity to 200% from 190% of salary, and (iii) target long-term incentive opportunity for the2018-2021 award period to 460% from 450% of salary. These increases in target opportunities reflect the Compensation Committee’s consideration of internal comparability factors, its assessment of Mr. Hicks’s superior performance over a long-term period, very positive 2017 results for Alleghany and its stockholders, and its emphasis on tying increases in Mr. Hicks’s compensation substantially to performance-based components.

Payouts of Awards in Respect of 20152018 Performance

The Compensation Committee generally determines the payout of awards for prior performance periods at a meeting in late February, upon the completion of theyear-end audit of prior year financial statements. With respect to 2015,2018, the Compensation Committee determined payouts to the Named Executive Officers, including Mr. Hicks, of 20152018 annual incentive awards and 2012-20152015-2018 long-term incentive awards at its February 23, 201620, 2019 meeting. PayoutAnnual incentive payout determinations were based on Board and Compensation Committee discussions and determinations regarding Alleghany’s financial performance for 20152018 and applicable award periods, an evaluation of Mr. Hicks’s 20152018 performance, and the recommendation of Mr. Hicks regarding the individual performance of the other Named Executive Officers. With respect to the 2015-2018 long-term incentive awards, no payouts were made as threshold performance was not achieved.

Compensation Committee Advisors and Services

The Compensation Committee has retained Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc., or “FW Cook,”Semler Brossy as a compensation consultant commencing in June 2018 to assist the Compensation Committee in its review of executive and director compensation practices,

-48-


including the competitiveness of Alleghany executive compensation, executive compensation program design matters, market trends and technical considerations. Prior to its determination to retain FW Cook, the Compensation Committee reviewed and assessed the independence of FW Cook as a firm and the individuals providing advice to the Compensation Committee in compliance with the NYSE’s listing standards. The Compensation Committee determined that FW Cook as a firm and the relevant individual advisers were independent.

The nature and scope of services that FW CookSemler Brossy provides to the Compensation Committee include the following: competitive market compensation analyses; assistance with the redesign of any director or

-43-


management compensation or benefit programs as necessary or requested; assistance with respect to analyzing the impact of regulatory and/or accounting developments on our compensation plans and programs; and preparation for and attendance at selected Compensation Committee meetings. FW CookSemler Brossy is also available to advise the Compensation Committee and management on various executive compensation matters involving our operating subsidiaries. The Chairman of the Compensation Committee reviews and approves all services provided by FW CookSemler Brossy and fees to be paid by Alleghany to FW Cook.

In evaluating our executive compensation program,Semler Brossy. As discussed on page 42, the Compensation Committee has been advised by FW CookSemler Brossy as to the compensation levels of other companies that might compete with us for executive talent. Competitive market data have been periodically developed by FW Cook from several different sources, including proxy statements. Although we do not seek

From January 2018 to set our executive compensation primarily based on any benchmarks or peer group, we believe that information regarding pay practices at other companies is nevertheless useful in two respects. First, we recognize that our compensation practices must be competitive in the marketplace. Second, independent marketplace information is one of the many factors that we consider in assessing the reasonableness of compensation. In this regard, in considering compensation for the NEOs,June 2018, the Compensation Committee considers comparativewas advised by its compensation consultant, F.W. Cook. During this time, F.W. Cook assisted the Compensation Committee in its review of executive and director compensation practices, including the competitiveness of Alleghany executive compensation, executive compensation program design matters, market data periodically requested from FW Cook. FW Cook last prepared this analysis in November 2015trends and FWtechnical considerations. The Compensation Committee reviewed and assessed F.W. Cook’s peer group companies were:

Allied World

EnduranceReinsurance Group of America

Arch Capital

Erie IndemnityRenaissanceRe

Axis Capital Holdings

Everest Re GroupValidus

Chubb

Markel CorporationWhite Mountains

Cincinnati Financial

Old Republic InternationalW.R. Berkley

CNA Financial

ProgressiveXL Group

This peer group was selected based on publicly traded companies that generallyindependence as a group (i) approximate our scope of businessfirm and the individuals providing advice to the Compensation Committee and determined that of our subsidiaries, including revenuethe firm and market capitalization, (ii) are similar to us in the importance to their business of capital allocation, investments and risk management, (iii) compete with us for a comparable pool of talent, and (iv) reflect our global presence.relevant individual advisors were independent.

Additionally, our senior officers have all been recruited mid-career, and our compensation must be reasonably competitive with that of their former employers. However, we do not seek to compete for executive talent solely on the basis of compensation. Rather, we also compete by offering a unique professional opportunity to work in a high integrity environment where the focus is on building long-term stockholder value.

Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

Consistent with the Board’s recommendation and thenon-binding stockholder vote at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Alleghany holds a stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation, commonly referred to as “say on pay,“say-on-pay, every year. The Compensation Committee monitors the results of Alleghany’s “say-on-pay”“say-on-pay” proposal and related stockholder feedback when evaluating the effectiveness of Alleghany’s compensation policies and disclosures, particularly in the event of a negative vote or significant change in the percentage of favorable votes with regard to such proposal.

Alleghany also actively engages with its significant stockholders to gauge their opinions on a range of topics, including executive compensation. We view this as an important opportunity to develop broader relationships with key investors over the long–long term and to engage in open dialogue on compensation and governance related issues.

At our Annual Meeting of Stockholders in April 2015,2018, we received strong support for our executive compensation program, with approximately 97%98% stockholder approval of our say on paysay-on-pay proposal. When setting compensation for 2016,2019, the Compensation Committee considered both the level of voting support from our stockholders on oursay-on-pay vote, as well as stockholder feedback and Semler Brossy’s observations when evaluating our executive compensation plans and determined that no material changes to the Alleghany’s executive compensation program were warranted. The Compensation Committee will continue to review the design of the executive compensation program in light of future “say-on-pay”“say-on-pay” votes, developments in executive compensation, and Alleghany’spay-for-performance philosophy to ensure that the executive compensation program continues to serve the best interests of Alleghany and its stockholders.

-44-


Elements of 20152018 Compensation

The principal elements of compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers in respect of 20152018 consisted of:

 

salaries;

 

annual cash incentive compensation under the 2010 MIP;compensation;

 

-49-


annual grants of long-term equity-based incentives under the 2012 LTIP;incentives; and

 

an annual savings benefit equal to 15% of base salary.

In addition, our Named Executive Officers receive a benefit, assuming the completion of five years of service with Alleghany, or a subsidiary of Alleghany, under a retirement plan,the Retirement Plan, although such benefit was frozen in 2013.

The percentage that these elements represent of the 20152018 compensation for our chief executive officer and our other Named Executive Officers is reflected below.

 

 

LOGOLOGO

Set out below in more detail is a description and analysis of each of these elements of our compensation program.

Salary

We seek to pay salaries that are sufficiently competitive to attract and retain executive talent. The Compensation Committee generally makes salary adjustments annually, in consultation with FW Cook,its compensation consultant, based on salaries for the prior year, general inflation, individual performance and internal comparability considerations. The following actions were taken with respect to 20152018 salaries for our Named Executive Officers:

 

    2014 Salary      2015 Salary   Rationale

Mr. Hicks

   1,000,000    LOGO      1,000,000    No change due to continued emphasis on performance-linked compensation

Mr. Brandon

   800,000    LOGO      800,000    No change due to continued emphasis on performance-linked compensation

Mr. Dalrymple

   600,000    LOGO      630,000    Recognition of 2014 performance and internal comparability considerations with other Senior Vice Presidents

Mr. Gorham

   600,000    LOGO      600,000    No change due to sufficiently competitive level of pay

Mr. Sennott

   600,000    LOGO      630,000    Recognition of 2014 performance and internal comparability considerations with other Senior Vice Presidents

    2018 Salary($)      2017 Salary ($)   Rationale

Mr. Hicks

  $1,030,000   LOGO  $1,000,000   3% increase reflecting 2017 contributions, continued emphasis on performance-linked compensation and first salary increase since 2011.

Mr. Brandon

   875,000   LOGO   850,000   3% increase reflecting 2017 contributions and continued emphasis on performance-linked compensation.

Mr. Dalrymple

   690,000   LOGO   670,000   3% increase reflecting 2017 contributions and continued emphasis on performance-linked compensation.

Mr. Sennott

   690,000   LOGO   670,000   3% increase reflecting 2017 contributions and continued emphasis on performance-linked compensation.

 

-45--50-


Annual Cash Incentive Compensation

We generally pay annual cash incentives to our Named Executive Officers under the Management Incentive Plan then in effect. These2015 MIP. The intent of these annual cash incentive awards are intendedis to provide apay-for-performance element for the achievement of Alleghany’s shorter-term objectives. Awards granted in 2015 were made under the 2010 MIP. Stockholders approved the 2015 MIP at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which replaced the 2010 MIP. Awards granted in 2016 will be made under the 2015 MIP, which is substantially similar to the 2010 MIP.

In making 20152018 awards under the 20102015 MIP, the Compensation Committee recognized that, given the nature of Alleghany’s business and long-term approach, evaluating how we achieveAlleghany achieves shorter-term objectives can be a subjective process, but believed thisthe subjectivity is mitigated by the fact that these 20152018 annual cash incentive awards were subject to two meaningful limitations. First, no payout to any Named Executive Officer could exceed the amount of his maximum annual incentive opportunity set at the beginning of 2015,2018, resulting in a $2.5an approximate $3.1 million maximum award opportunity for Mr. Hicks and an aggregate maximum award opportunity of approximately $5.7$6.2 million for our Named Executive Officers as a group. Second, funding of the 20152018 Incentive Pool Amount (as defined below) is limited by theto a specified level of earnings produced by management in 2015.2018. To the extent the funding of the 20152018 Incentive Pool Amount had been less than the aggregate maximum award amount of approximately $5.7$6.2 million for our Named Executive Officers as a group, apro-rata reduction of individual award amounts would have occurred. To the extent that Alleghany had a loss for 2015,2018, no payout would have been made under the 20102015 MIP. In sum, payouts under the 20102015 MIP for 20152018 performance are the lesser of (i) the 20152018 Incentive Pool Amount orand (ii) the maximum opportunity for management (as may be reduced by the Compensation Committee for individual performance).

Process

The Compensation Committee makes annual incentive awards for the upcoming year and determines each Named Executive Officer’s appropriate target amount in January of that year after evaluating projected earnings for the prior year. 20152018 target annual incentive awards and maximum incentive opportunities were as follows:

 

  

2018

Salary($)

   Target
Opportunity($/%)
   Maximum
Opportunity($)(1)
 
  

2015

Salary

   Target
Opportunity($/%)
   Maximum
Opportunity ($)(1)
 

Mr. Hicks

  $1,000,000    $1,700,000(170%)    $2,550,000    $1,030,000   $2,060,000   (200%)   $3,090,000 

Mr. Brandon

   800,000     1,080,000(135%)     1,620,000     875,000    1,163,750   (133%)    1,750,000 

Mr. Dalrymple

   630,000     409,500  (65%)     614,250     690,000    462,000   (67%)    690,000 

Mr. Gorham

   600,000     180,000  (30%)     270,000  

Mr. Sennott

   630,000     409,500  (65%)     614,250     690,000    462,000   (67%)    690,000 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

    

 

 

Totals

  $3,660,000    $3,779,000               $5,668,500    $3,285,000    $4,147,750    $6,220,000 
  

 

   

 

    

 

 

 

(1)

The maximum opportunity percentage for each respective Named Executive Officer is approximately 150% of such Named Executive Officer’s target award.

The differing target awards as a percentage of salary reflect the Compensation Committee’s determinations of appropriate levels and mix of compensation components, taking into account varying levels of responsibility, internal comparability, the implicit impact of the various Named Executive Officer levels on the accomplishment of Alleghany’s financial, strategic and operational objectives and competitive considerations. For 2018 annual incentive awards, the opportunities for each of our Named Executive Officers, expressed as a percentage of salary, were the same as those set forth above for 2017, except for Mr. Hicks whose opportunity at target was increased to 200% of salary, or $2,060,000, with a maximum opportunity of $3,090,000 reflecting the Compensation Committee’s consideration of internal comparability factors, its assessment of Mr. Hicks’s superior performance over a long-term period, very positive 2017 results for Alleghany and its stockholders, and its emphasis on tying increases in Mr. Hicks’s compensation substantially to performance-based components.

Payout of awards is tied to the achievement of a specified financial performance objective, subject to reduction in respect of Alleghany performance and/or individual performance. The financial performance objective is set in January, after evaluating projected earnings for 20152018 and determining each Named Executive

-51-


Officer’s appropriate target opportunity amount. With respect to individual performance objectives, each of our Named Executive Officers submits individual objectives for the coming year, with Mr. Hicks submitting his to the Board and the other Named Executive Officers submitting their individual objectives to Mr. Hicks. These

-46-


objectives are in addition to the core responsibilities of our Named Executive Officers. Status updates on the achievement of such individual objectives and performance of core responsibilities are given through the year by each Named Executive Officer, culminating in a final report made in advance of payout determinations made by the Board and Compensation Committee at the beginning of the following year. In this regard, Mr. Hicks provides a self-evaluation to the Board of his performance against objectives during the year and Messrs. Brandon, Dalrymple Gorham and Sennott providedprovide Mr. Hicks with the same, which Mr. Hicks then reviewedreviews with the Compensation Committee.

Financial Performance Objective

The 20152018 financial performance goal established by the Compensation Committee for annual incentive awards to our Named Executive Officers was based on a funding approach, which was capped at an amount equal to 3% of 20152018 earnings before income taxes, as reported in Alleghany’s audited financial statements, as adjusted, or the “2015“2018 Incentive Pool Amount,” to:

 

exclude effects of accounting changes, charges for goodwill or intangibles impairment (including other than temporary impairment charges);

 

exclude expenses incurred in connection with actual and potential acquisitions; and

 

deduct from 20152018 earnings a rolling four-year (2011-2014)(2014-2017) average of catastrophe losses at RSUI, our principal insurance subsidiary, and TransRe, our principal reinsurance subsidiary, instead of actual 20152018 catastrophe losses at RSUI and TransRe.

With respect to catastrophe losses, RSUI’s 2011-20142014-2017 catastrophe average, was $94.1 million, or the “RSUI CAT Average,” was $85.2 million compared with 20152018 actual catastrophe losses of $21.1 million, net of prior year development and reinsurance reinstatement premiums, and TransRe’s 2011-2014 catastrophe average was $279.5 million, or the “TransRe CAT Average,” compared with 2015 actual catastrophe losses of $(0.1)$133.4 million, net of prior year development and reinsurance reinstatement premiums. These differences mean that an additional $352.6TransRe’s 2014-2017 catastrophe average, or the “TransRe CAT Average,” was $166.5 million ofcompared with 2018 actual catastrophe losses were deducted from Alleghany’s pre-tax earnings in determining the funding for the 2015 Incentive Pool Amount than would have been deducted from Alleghany’s pre-tax earnings using actual 2015 catastrophe losses.

of $446.5 million, net of prior year development and reinsurance reinstatement premiums. The use of the RSUI CAT Average and TransRe CAT Average rather than the actual amount of their respective 20152018 catastrophe losses was based upon the Compensation Committee’s acknowledgement that RSUI and TransRe are significant writers of catastrophe exposed property (re)insurance and that management cannot predict the occurrence or severity of catastrophe losses in any particular year. Using a four-year average recognizes that catastrophe losses are a cost of doing business and accounts for them in a manner consistent with Alleghany’s focus on long-term performance. In this regard, actual catastrophe losses whether in excess of, or less than, actual catastrophe losses in a particular year, impact funding calculations for annual incentive pools during the four-year averaging period in which they are included. A year in which Alleghany experiences significant catastrophe losses, such as it did during 2018, will impact MIP annual incentive pool funding for the subsequent four years, holding management fully accountable for such catastrophe losses.

 

-47--52-


Individual Performance Objectives

In January 2015,2018, Mr. Hicks provided the Board, and Messrs. Brandon, Dalrymple Gorham and Sennott provided Mr. Hicks, with their 2018 objectives for 2015 that were in addition to performance of their core responsibilities. These core responsibilities and 20152018 objectives for our Named Executive Officers included the following:

 

    Core Responsibilities  20152018 Objectives

Mr. Hicks

  

•   Building stockholder value over the long-term,long term, reported and measured regularly

•   Consolidated 20152018 financial results

•   Ultimate responsibility for reinsurance and insurance subsidiary underwriting performance

•   Ultimate responsibility for equity and fixed income portfolio investment performance

•   Management development at parent and subsidiaries

  

•   Improve the profitability of CapSpecialty and PacificCompRedeploy capital from certain strategic investments into Alleghany Capital investments

•   Work with TransRe on itsConsider strategic alternatives inat the current reinsurance market cycleparent and subsidiary levels

•   Oversee the continued development of Alleghany Capital, including acquisitions at an attractive price

•   Assess and revise Roundwood Asset Management public equities investment process and consider alternative strategies

•    Manage corporate equity investment portfolio for attractive long-term total returns

Mr. Brandon

  

•   Primary operational oversight of Alleghany’s reinsurance and insurance subsidiaries

•   Ensure that each insurance subsidiary meets its 20152018 business plan

•   Oversee the operations of TransRe from a parent-level and stockholder perspective as Chairman of TransRe’s Board of Directors

•   Assist the CEO with the strategic development of Alleghany and its insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries

  

•   Support (re)insurance subsidiaries in achieving their profitability targetsstrategic goals and strategic goalsunderwriting profit

•   Evaluate strategic developments, opportunities and issues affecting Alleghany and its (re)insurance operations

•   Analyze and lead potential (re)insurance acquisition or investment opportunities

•   Help TransRe to develop profitable business opportunities

•    Work with PacificComp and CapSpecialty in executing their business plans

Mr. Dalrymple

  

•   Ultimate oversight forOversee management of all legal issues at parent and subsidiaries, including transactional, litigation and regulatory

•   Oversight ofOversee corporate governance and secretarial functions

•   Ultimate legal oversight ofOversee SEC disclosure reports

•   Ultimate oversight ofOversee legal costs at parent and subsidiaries

  

•   WorkOrganize and assist Board with investor relations on target governance outreachdirector search process

•   Propose plan to Alleghany’s significant stockholdersBoard to address ESG matters

•   Work with Board on newCEO and Compensation Committee processes and pending 2016 Board retirement mattersto consider possible revisions to executive compensation program

•   ManageOversee legal diligence and oversighthuman resources integration of TransRe strategic initiatives

•    Analyze and report on Stranded Oil Resources Corporation existing agreements with Laredo Oil in connection with strategic evaluation

-48-


Core Responsibilities2015 Objectives

Mr. Gorham

•    Management of $13.8 billion fixed income portfolio

•    Chairman of TransRe, RSUI and PacificComp Board of Directors investment committees

•    Treasurer for Alleghany

•    Determine optimal investment strategies to reduce alternative minimum taxes and increase utilization of foreign tax credits

•    Evaluate and invest in a new fixed income asset class

•    Assist with the evaluation of non-fixed income investment opportunities Capital acquisitions

Mr. Sennott

  

•   Principal financial officer responsible for the fair and accurate presentation of the financial results

•   Oversight of Alleghany financial function and maintenance of control environment

•   Responsible for capital management and annual strategic planning efforts

•   Responsible for rating agency relationships and management

  

•   Ensure quality, accuracyAnalyze and content over the financial statementsexecute reformat of Alleghany segment disclosures

•   Transition planning for Alleghany’s fixed income department

•   Analyze and public filings of Alleghanyrecommend capital management alternatives

•   Coordinate the communication and relationship management efforts with rating agencies

•    Oversee Alleghanyexecute a 2018 investor relations function

•    Oversee Alleghany stock repurchase and debt maturity initiatives

•    Negotiate a new operating lease for Alleghany headquartersday

-53-


Payouts under the 2010 MIP with respect to 20152018 Performance

Based on our 20152018 financial results, the 20152018 Incentive Pool Funding Amount was $16.8approximately $11.2 million, so that Messrs. Hicks, Brandon, Dalrymple Gorham and Sennott were eligible to receive maximum payout in February 20162019 of their 20152018 incentive opportunities, aggregating to $5.7approximately $6.2 million, under the 20102015 MIP based on achievement of the financial performance goal, subject to reduction for individual performance.

At its meeting on February 23, 2016,20, 2019, the Compensation Committee evaluated Alleghany’s overall corporate performance and the individual performance of Mr. Hicks, and Mr. Hicks’s recommendation regarding the individual performance of the other Named Executive Officers.

With respect to Mr. Hicks’s individualAlleghany’s operating performance and achievement of strategic objectives, the Compensation Committee noted the following positive factors, among others, during 2015:2018:

 

strong underwriting resultsRecord earnings and a double-digit return on invested capital at TransRe and RSUI , particularly in lightAlleghany Capital, along with completion of a highly competitive (re)insurance environment;successful acquisition of Concord,

 

continued improvementAlleghany Capital’s platform companies strengthened through several complementary,bolt-on acquisitions,

Significant outperformance of Alleghany benchmarks on equity portfolio, including the S&P 500 by 4.4%, and slight positive return on fixed income portfolio in a period of mostly rising interest rates and widening credit spreads,

Positive underwriting results at RSUI and CapSpecialty and PacificComp compared with 2014 underwriting results;in 2018,

 

continued build-outMaintenance of Alleghany Capital portfolio companies, including the acquisition of IPS;

completed reorganization of equity investment functiona strong financial position with low financial leverage and execution of change in equity investment strategy;

relatively modest growth in common stockholders’ equity per share of 4.4% in 2015;significant holding company liquidity, and

 

dampened investment performance in 2015 compared with 2014.Returning value to stockholders through a special $10.00 per share cash dividend and $492 million of share repurchases.

These positive factors were partially offset by factors including an underwriting loss for 2018 at TransRe, primarily due to elevated catastrophe losses, and a 2018 fourth quarter impairment charge at Stranded Oil Resources Corporation.

After consideration of these and other factors, the Compensation Committee determined to make a payout to Mr. Hicks of his 20152018 annual bonusincentive opportunity at $2,163,000, representing 105% of his target or $1.7 million.

-49-


opportunity and 70% of his maximum opportunity, compared with a payment of his prior year annual incentive award at 112.5% of target and 75% of his maximum opportunity. Regarding individual performance of the other Named Executive Officers, Mr. Hicks’s recommendations reflected the achievementfactors cited above, Mr. Hicks’s assessment of individual objectives for Messrs. Brandon, Dalrymple, Gorham, and Sennott. For Mr. Brandon, the payout reflected the very profitable 2015 underwriting results at TransRe and RSUI, underwriting result improvements at CapSpecialty and PacificComp, support of TransRe initiatives and accomplishment of strategic initiatives at our (re)insurance subsidiaries. For Mr. Dalrymple, the payout reflected superior performance of hiswith respect to their core responsibilities, and achievement of his 2015 objectives, particularly with respect to corporate governance initiatives and oversight. For Mr. Sennott, the payout reflected superior performance of his core responsibilities as well as achievement of his 2015 objectives, including ensuring quality, accuracy and content of Alleghany’s financial reporting, overseeing Alleghany’s investor relations and stock repurchase and debt maturity initiatives and negotiating a new operating lease for Alleghany’s headquarters. For Mr. Gorham, the payout reflected superior performance of his core responsibilities as well as achievement of his 2015 objectives, including determining optimal investment strategies to reduce alternative maximum taxes and increase use of foreign tax credits, evaluating and investing in a new fixed income asset class and assisting in the evaluation of non-fixed income investment opportunities.

their 2018 objectives. Following the evaluations by Mr. Hicks of the other Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee authorized payouts of 20152018 annual bonus opportunities at maximum to Messrs. Brandon, Dalrymple Gorham and Sennott under the 20102015 MIP for an aggregate payout to them in the amount of approximately $3.1 million.

Long-Term Equity-Based Incentive Compensation

In 2015,2018, we made awards of long-term incentive compensation to our Named Executive Officers under the 20122017 Long-Term Incentive Plan, or the “2017 LTIP. Historically, long-term incentive awards have been made primarily in the form of performance shares and, in certain cases, shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units. Awards of performance shares under the 20122017 LTIP are intended to provide apay-for-performance component of compensation based upon the achievement of longer-term financial objectives focused on growth in book value per share. Awards of restricted stock or restricted stock units under the 20122017 LTIP are intended to provide a retention component of compensation, the value of which is tied to the market price of our common stock.

-54-


Performance Shares

For the 2015-20182018-2021 award period, the Compensation Committee based the number of performance shares awarded to each Named Executive Officer upon a percentage of such officer’s 20152018 salary (as determined by the Compensation Committee) divided by the average closing prices of common stock for the30-day period prior to the mailing of material for the meeting of the Compensation Committee at which such awards were made. Such percentages of 20152018 salary were as follows:

 

  2015 Salary   Opportunity %   Opportunity $    2018 Salary   Opportunity%   Opportunity $  

Mr. Hicks

  $1,000,000     400    $4,000,000    $1,030,000    460           $4,738,000 

Mr. Brandon

   800,000     300     2,400,000     875,000    300            2,625,000 

Mr. Dalrymple

   630,000     100     630,000     690,000    100            690,000 

Mr. Gorham

   600,000     45     270,000  

Mr. Sennott

   630,000     100     630,000     690,000    100            690,000 
      

 

       

 

 

Total 2015 Performance Share Opportunities

  

  $7,930,000  

Total 2018 Performance Share Opportunities

Total 2018 Performance Share Opportunities

 

  $8,743,000 
      

 

       

 

 

The differing target awards as a percentage of salary reflect the Compensation Committee’s determinations of appropriate levels and mix of compensation components, taking into account varying levels of responsibility, within Alleghany, internal comparability, and the implicit impact of the various Named Executive Officers on the accomplishment of ourAlleghany’s financial, strategic and operational objectives, and competitive considerations. With respect to Mr. Hicks in particular, his 20152018 performance share award reflected the Compensation Committee’s determination to tie Mr. Hicks’s compensation closely to Alleghany’s financial performance and its views of the

-50-


challenge of meeting the financial performance goals for the 2015-20182018-2021 award period in light of the current interest rate environment and (re)insurance market environment.environments. For 20162018 performance share awards, the opportunities for each of our Named Executive Officers, expressed as a percentage of salary, were the same as those set forth above for 2015.2017, except for Mr. Hicks whose opportunity at target was increased to 460% of salary from 450% of salary.

In making performance share awards for the 2015-20182018-2021 period, the Compensation Committee took account of:considered:

 

Alleghany’s financial objective in the current economic environment of growing book value per share at rates of7-10% over the long term without employing excessive amounts of financial leverage and withoutor taking imprudent risks;

 

the prevailing financial and economic conditions and uncertainties;

 

the alignment of performance goals with Alleghany’s near-term strategy, with a particular emphasis on maintaining Alleghany’s financial strength;

its desire to set performance goals at levels high enough to encourage strong performance but still reasonably attainable to avoid encouraging the use of excessive financial leverage or taking of imprudent risks; and

 

the prevailing current10-year U.S. Treasury rates and prevailing equity risk premiums adjusted for Alleghany’s estimated stock volatility relative to the market.

Taking into account such conditions, Alleghany’s strategy the Compensation Committee set the following performance goals for the 2015-20182018-2021 period:

 

maximum payouts at 150% of the value of one share of common stock on the payout date for average annual compound growth in our Book Value Per Share (as defined by the Compensation Committee pursuant to the 20122017 LTIP) of 9% or more over the four-year award period ending December 31, 2018,2021, as adjusted for stock dividends;

 

-55-


target payouts at 100% of the value of one share of common stock on the payout date if such growth equals 7%, and payouts at 50% of the value of one share of common stock on the payout date if such growth equals 5%, with payouts for growth between the foregoing levels to be determined by straight line interpolation; and

 

no payouts if such growth is less than 5%.

The Compensation Committee believed that the above payout thresholds would continue to be challenging to meet, particularly in light of slow U.S. and global economic growth, a prolonged period of very low interest rates when a significant portion of Alleghany’s (re)insurance subsidiary investment assets are required to be held in high-quality fixed income securities, relatively high current valuations in equity markets and the imperative to maintain underwriting discipline, even if it means shrinkingtop-line growth, in increasinglythe continuing extremely competitive reinsurance and insurance markets due to an abundance of both traditional and new alternative underwriting capacity.

Restricted Stock Units

In 2015,2018, long-term incentive opportunities for Mr. Dalrymple and Mr. Sennott included 697 restricted stock units, representing awards set at 50% of their respective base salaries, which cliff-vest four years from date of grant. These grants of restricted stock units are intended to further align Mr. Dalrymple’sbalance risk in our long-term incentive program and Mr. Sennott’s interests with those of our stockholders, while incenting the prudence desired in their roles as General Counsel and chief financial officer in preserving stockholder value.maintain a focus on rewarding longer-term performance.

Perquisites

Our general practice is to not provide perquisites or other personal benefits to our Named Executive Officers. In 2015,2018, no Named Executive Officer received more than $10,000 in perquisites or other personal benefits.

Deferred Compensation Plan

We credit an amount equal to 15% of a Named Executive Officer’s base salary to the Deferred Compensation Plan each year. Entitlement to this savings benefit is not based on performance. As it is our intention that a significant portion of compensation for our Named Executive Officers be contingent on

-51-


performance objectives, the savings benefit offered by the Deferred Compensation Plan provides a stable component of total compensation. In addition, the Deferred Compensation Plan permits our Named Executive Officers to elect to defer the receipt, and thus the taxation, of all or part of their base salary and their annual cash bonus. A participant may choose to have savings benefit credit amounts and deferred salary and bonus amounts either credited with interest, treated as though invested in our common stock or increased or decreased by an amount proportionate to the growth or decline in our stockholders’ equity per share.

Retirement Plan

Retirement benefits for our Named Executive Officers are provided under the Retirement Plan. Under the Retirement Plan, a participant must have completed five years of service with Alleghany or a subsidiary of Alleghany before he or she is vested in, and thus has a right to receive, any retirement benefits following his or her termination of employment. Effective December 31, 2013, the Retirement Plan was closed to new participants and no additional benefits for existing participants accrue after such date. Any participant who was not vested in his or her accrued benefit as of December 31, 2013 will continue to have future service with Alleghany credited toward the Retirement Plan’s five-year vesting requirement.

-56-


Financial Statement Restatements

It is our Board’s policy that the Compensation Committee will, to the extent permitted by governing law, have the sole and absolute authority to make retroactive negative adjustments to any cash or equity-based incentive compensation awarded or paid to any of our officers where the award or payment was predicated upon the achievement of performance goals that were subsequently restated or otherwise adjusted in a manner that would reduce the size of any such award or payment. In this regard, the Compensation Committee is authorized to have Alleghany seek to recover any amount the Compensation Committee determines was inappropriately received by any officer.

Hedging and Pledging Policies

We maintain a policy on insider trading and compliance that prohibits our officers from directly or indirectly purchasing or using financial instruments that are designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of Alleghany securities they own. In addition, under such policy, officers are prohibited from pledging Alleghany securities as collateral.

Executive Officer Stock Ownership Guidelines

We expect our executive officers to achieve ownership of our common stock having an aggregate value (based upon the higher of market value or book value) equal to a multiple of base salary, as follows: for our President and chief executive officer, the multiple is five times base salary; for our Executive Vice President, the multiple is four times base salary; for our Senior Vice Presidents, the multiple is three times base salary; and for our Vice Presidents, the multiple is one times base salary. We expect our executive officers to retain 75% of the shares of common stock (net of taxes) awardedpaid out to them under our long-term incentive plans until they achieve their applicable ownership levels, and they are expected to maintain such levels thereafter.

Tax Considerations

We are not allowed a deduction underThe TCJA substantially modified Section 162(m) of Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code for any“Code,” and, among other things, eliminated the performance-based exception to the $1 million deduction limit effective as of January 1, 2018. As a result, beginning in 2018, compensation paid to a “covered employee”the Named Executive Officers in excess of $1.0$1 million per year,will generally be nondeductible, regardless of whether it is performance-based. In addition, beginning in 2018, the executive officers subject to certain exceptions. In general, “covered employees”Section 162(m), or, the “Covered Employees,” will include our President andany individual who served as the chief executive officer or chief financial officer at any time during the taxable year and ourthe three other most highly compensated officers (other than the chief executive officers (not including ourofficer and chief financial officer) who are in our employfor the taxable year, and are officers atonce an individual becomes a Covered Employee for any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2016, that individual will remain a Covered Employee for all future years, including following any termination of employment.

The TCJA includes a transition rule under which the end of the tax year. Among other exceptions, the deduction limit doeschanges to Section 162(m) described above will not apply to compensation payable pursuant to a written binding contract that meetswas in effect on November 2, 2017 and is not materially modified after that date. To the specified requirements under Section 162(m)extent applicable to existing contracts and awards, the Compensation Committee may avail itself of this transition rule. However, because of uncertainties as to the application and interpretation of the Code for “performance-based compensation.” In general, those

-52-


requirements includetransition rule, no assurances can be given at this time that our existing contracts and awards, even if in place on November 2, 2017, will meet the establishment of objective performance goals for the payment of such compensation by a committeerequirements of the board of directors composed solely of two or more outside directors, stockholder approval of the material terms of such compensation prior to payment, and certification by the committee that the performance goals have been achieved prior to the payment of such compensation. Such requirements permit the committee administering the plan to make discretionary adjustments to performance goals that would reduce payouts but do not permit discretionary adjustments to performance goals that would increase payouts.

The Compensation Committee believes that establishing appropriate compensation arrangements to retain and incent our executive officers best serves our interests and the interests of our stockholders. In ordertransition rule. Moreover, to maintain flexibility to compensate ourin compensating executive officers in a manner designed to promote long-termvarying corporate goals and objectives,in the best interest of the company, the Compensation Committee hasdoes not adopted a policy that alllimit its actions with respect to executive compensation must be deductible. However,to preserve deductibility under Section 162(m) if the Compensation Committee also believesdetermines that when appropriate, consideration should be given to seeking to maximize the deductibility of the compensation paid to our executive officers.

The 2010 MIP permits the Compensation Committee to grant awards that are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code, or “qualifying awards,” and awards that are not intended to qualify as “performance-based” compensation, or “non-qualifying awards.” Consistent with the 2010 MIP and the Compensation Committee’s consideration and balancing of its executive compensation objectives, the amounts identified under the Stock Awards and Non-Equity Incentive Plan columns of the Summary Compensation Table on page 54 paid to Messrs. Hicks, Brandon, Dalrymple and Gorham for 2015 and 2014 and to Messrs. Hicks, Brandon and Dalrymple for 2013 are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code, except for the restricted stock units awarded to Mr. Dalrymple in 2015 and 2014. The cash bonus paid to Mr. Sennott for 2013 identified under the Bonus Column of the Summary Compensation Table does not qualify as “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m). Mr. Sennott’s compensation reflecteddoing so is in the Summary Compensation Table for 2015 and 2014 does not have to qualify as “performance-based compensation” for purposesbest interests of Section 162(m) of the Code because a person serving as our chief financial officer at the end of a given year is not a “covered” employee for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code for such year.Alleghany.

-57-


Compensation Policies and Practices Relating to Risk Management

Risk analysis has always been part of our design and review of our group-wide executive incentive plans, and the Compensation Committee regularly monitors compensation policies, practices and outstanding awards to determine whether our risk management and incentive objectives are being met with respect to group-wide employee incentives. Our material risks include investment risk (debt and equity), as well as catastrophe losses and material mispricing of risk at our insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries. The Board’s and management’s risk oversight is discussed on page 16.15. The Compensation Committee does not believe that risks arising from our group-wide compensation policies and practices for our employees are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Alleghany. In this regard, as discussed on pages 37 and 38,page 43, our shortshort- and long-term incentive plans are capped at individual levels so as not to incent imprudent risk taking to achieve outsized payouts. In addition, our officers are required to own a substantial amount of common stock to ensure that they maintain a significant stake in our long-term success, and we have in place a compensation clawback policy applicable to our officers to further discourage imprudent risk taking. Further, we do not grant stock options to officers as we do not wish to reward or punish them for exogenous short-term market price movements. The management teams of our insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are incented to write profitable business and have no incentives to grow premium volume by underpricing risk. The Compensation Committee seeks to set realistic incentive goals, monitors them in light of economic conditions and our strategy and risk appetite, and will consider appropriate adjustments in respect thereof in the event of any conflict between incentives and the Board’s strategy and risk appetite.

 

-53--58-


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information under this heading relates to the compensation of our Named Executive Officers during 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013.2016.

Summary Compensation Table

 

Name and

Principal Position

 Year Salary Bonus(1) Stock
Awards(2)
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(3)
 Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(4)
 All Other
Compensation(5)
 Total  Year Salary Bonus Stock
Awards(1)
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(2)
 Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(3)
 All Other
Compensation(4)
 SEC Total Total not
Including
Change in
Pension
Value(5)
 

Weston M. Hicks

  2015   $1,000,000       $4,026,509   $1,700,000       $166,176   $6,892,685   2018  $1,030,000   $4,767,823  $2,163,000  $  $168,529  $8,129,352  $8,129,352 

President and chief

executive officer

  2014    1,000,000        3,959,904    2,500,000   $2,914,467    168,675    10,543,046   2017  1,000,000     4,574,824  2,137,500  1,844,203  163,287  9,719,814  7,875,611 
 2013    1,250,000        3,983,966    2,000,000        213,759    7,447,725    2016  1,000,000     3,977,278  2,550,000  945,832  162,482  8,635,592  7,689,760 

Joseph P. Brandon

  2015    800,000        2,415,815    1,620,000        132,716    4,968,531   2018  875,000   2,828,591  1,750,000     140,858  5,594,449  5,594,449 

Executive Vice President

  2014    800,000        2,376,099    1,600,000    254,392    135,071    5,165,562   2017  850,000     2,591,832  1,275,000  137,703  136,930  4,991,465  4,853,762 
 2013    1,000,000        2,124,755    1,200,000    337,805    167,907    4,830,467    2016  825,000     2,460,722  1,650,000  81,904  132,650  5,150,276  5,068,372 

Christopher K. Dalrymple

  2015    630,000        951,133    614,250        103,890    2,299,273   2018  690,000   1,114,654  690,000     109,719  2,604,373  2,604,373 

Senior Vice President,

General Counsel, and Secretary

  2014    600,000        890,402    600,000    702,363    100,232    2,892,997  
 2013    550,000        876,778    550,000    29,707    92,347    2,098,832  

Roger B. Gorham

  2015    600,000        271,557    270,000    256,464    100,572    1,498,593  

Senior Vice President-

Head of Fixed

Income and Treasurer

  2014    600,000        237,258    240,000    373,171    101,692    1,552,121  
 2013    600,000        233,642    220,000        101,542    1,155,184  
          

Senior Vice President,

General Counsel and Secretary

 2017  670,000     1,021,634  502,000  416,635  106,674  2,716,943  2,300,308 
 2016  650,000     969,418  650,000  223,156  103,256  2,595,830  2,372,674 

John L. Sennott, Jr.

  2015    630,000        951,133    614,250        104,422    2,299,805   2018  690,000   1,114,654  690,000     110,224  2,604,878  2,604,878 

Senior Vice President and

chief financial officer

  2014    600,000        890,402    600,000        100,691    2,191,093   2017  670,000     1,021,634  502,000     107,135  2,300,769  2,300,769 
 2013    389,583(6)  $180,000    1,357,448    550,000        65,971    2,543,002    2016  650,000     969,418  650,000     103,753  2,373,171  2,373,171 

 

(1)Reflects a cash bonus paid to Mr. Sennott upon commencement of his employment with Alleghany.

(2)Represents the grant date fair value of performance shares granted to the Named Executive Officers listed below under the 2012 LTIP and 2017 LTIP, computed in accordance with ASC 718.ACS 718, including adjustments for dividends credited to such awards. For information on the valuation assumptions used in these computations, see Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements included in the Form10-K. The grant date fair value of such performance shares, assuming payouts at maximum, is as follows:

 

Name

  2015   2014   2013   2018   2017   2016 

Mr. Hicks

  $6,039,764    $5,939,856    $5,975,949    $7,152,330   $6,862,236   $5,966,151 

Mr. Brandon

   3,623,722     3,564,148     3,187,137     4,243,199    3,888,052    3,691,083 

Mr. Dalrymple

   951,133     890,597     876,423     1,485,996    1,361,975    1,292,557 

Mr. Gorham

   407,336     355,887     350,463  

Mr. Sennott

   951,133     890,597     2,036,173     1,485,996    1,361,975    1,292,557 

 

    

For each of Mr. Dalrymple the amounts in this column also include the grant date fair value of restricted stock units awarded to him under the 2012 LTIP as follows:

Year

  Restricted Stock Units(#)   Grant Date Fair Value($) 

2015

   697    $317,044  

2014

   759     296,670  

2013

   825     292,496  

-54-


Forand Mr. Sennott, the amounts in this column also include the grant date fair value, including adjustments for dividends credited, of restricted stock units and performance shares awarded to himthem under the 2012 LTIPand 2017 LTIPs as follows:

 

Year

  Restricted Stock Units(#)   Performance Shares(#)   Grant Date Fair Value($) 

2015

   697         $317,044  

2014

   759          296,670  

2013

     3,540     2,036,173  

Year

  Restricted Stock Units(#)  Grant Date Fair Value($)

2018

  593  $371,343

2017

  559    340,342

2016

  691    323,139

 

(3)(2)

Represents cash incentive earned pursuant to awards under the 20102015 MIP.

 

(4)(3)

Reflects change in actuarial present value of pension benefits during 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013.2016. For Mr. Sennott, reflects that he is not a participant in the Retirement Plan. The actual change in pension value was negative for Messrs. Hicks, Brandon and Dalrymple in 2015, and for Mr. Hicks and Mr. Gorham in 2013. However, SEC regulations do not allow for inclusion of negative pension amounts in the Summary Compensation Table. Change in actuarial present value of pension benefits is subject to many external variables, such as interest rates, that are not related to Alleghany performance. Therefore,In this regard, approximately $1.3 million of the amount for 2017 relates to the decrease in the discount rate set mechanically by accounting policy in reference to a third-party benchmark. The actual

-59-


change in pension value in 2018 was negative for Messrs. Hicks, Brandon and Dalrymple. However, SEC regulations do not allow for inclusion of negative pension amounts in the Summary Compensation Table. Based on the above, we do not believe a year-over-year change in actuarial pension value is helpful in evaluating compensation for comparative purposes, and believe that stockholders may find the detailed explanation of changes in actuarial pension value for Messrs. Hicks, Brandon Dalrymple and GorhamDalrymple under “Change in Pension Value” on pages 58 and 59page 62 and the discussion of accumulated pension benefits under “Pension Benefits” on pages 6567 through 6769 to be useful for an understanding of the pension benefits provided to the Named Executive Officers.

 

(5)(4)

All Other Compensation amounts reflect the following items:

 

Name

  Year   Life Insurance and
Long-Term
Disability(a)
   Tax
Reimbursement(b)
   Savings
Benefit(c)
   Total   Year   Life Insurance and
Long-Term
Disability(a)
  Tax
Reimbursement(b)
  Savings
Benefit(c)
   Total 

Weston M. Hicks

   2015    $8,035    $8,141    $150,000    $166,176     2018   $7,380  $6,836   $154,313   $168,529 
   2014     8,500     8,612     151,563     168,675     2017     6,600    6,687   150,000    163,287 
 2013     14,320     11,939     187,500     213,759     2016     6,200    6,282   150,000    162,482 

Joseph P. Brandon

   2015     6,643     6,073     120,000     132,716     2018   $5,330  $4,434   $131,094   $140,858 
   2014     7,220     6,601     121,250     135,071     2017     5,008    4,579   127,344    136,931 
   2013     10,260     7,647     150,000     167,907     2016     4,731    4,325   123,594    132,650 

Christopher K. Dalrymple

   2015     5,003     4,574     94,313     103,890     2018   $3,463  $2,881   $103,375   $109,719 
   2014     5,508     5,036     89,688     100,232     2017     3,290    3,008   100,375    106,673 
   2013     6,000     4,472     81,875     92,347     2016     3,072    2,809   97,375    103,256 

Roger B. Gorham

   2015     5,523     5,049     90,000     100,572  
   2014     6,108     5,584     90,000     101,692  
   2013     6,792     5,062     89,688     101,542  

John L. Sennott, Jr

   2015     5,281     4,828     94,313     104,422     2018   $3,739  $3,110   $103,375   $110,224 
   2014     5,748     5,255     89,688     100,691     2017     3,532    3,229   100,375    107,136 
   2013     6,286     4,685     55,000     65,971     2016     3,332    3,046   97,375    103,753 

 

 (a)

Amounts represent the dollar value of the insurance premiums paid by Alleghany for the benefit of such individuals for life insurance and long-term disability insurance maintained by Alleghany on their behalf in each of the years presented. These life insurance policies provide a death benefit to each such officer if he is an employee at the time of his death equal to four times the amount of his annual salary at January 1 of the year of his death. These long-term disability insurance policies provide disability insurance coverage to each such officer in the event he becomes disabled (as defined in such policies) during his employment with Alleghany.

 

 (b)

Amounts represent the reimbursement of taxes, and the reimbursement itself, on income imputed to such individuals pursuant to Alleghany’s life insurance and long-term disability policies as described above in each of the years presented.

 

-55-


 (c)

Reflects savings benefit amounts credited by Alleghany pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Plan in each of the years presented. The method for calculating earnings on the savings benefit amounts under the Deferred Compensation Plan is set out on pages 6366 and 6467 in the narrative accompanying the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table.

 

(6)(5)Represents pro rata portion

The amounts in this column may differ substantially from, and are not a substitute for, the amounts reported in the “SEC Total” column. The amounts reported in this column are solely intended to facilitate a stockholder’s understanding of 2013 annual base salaryhow changes in pension value impact the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table in any given year. To facilitate that understanding, this column shows total compensation without pension value changes. The amounts reported in this column are calculated by subtracting the value reported in the “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column (but including the nonqualified deferred compensation earnings reported in that column, if any) from the amounts reported in the “SEC Total” column. The calculation of $550,000, reflecting Mr. Sennott’s commencementthe pension values and the causes of employment withthe significant year-over-year changes in pension value are subject to many external variables, such as interest rates, that are not related to Alleghany in April 2013.performance, and we believe that stockholders may

 

-56--60-


find the detailed explanation of changes in actuarial pension value for Messrs. Hicks, Brandon and Dalrymple under “Change in Pension Value” on page 62 and the discussion of accumulated pension benefits under “Pension Benefits” on pages 67 through 69 to be useful for an understanding of the pension benefits provided to the Named Executive Officers.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 20152018

 

Name

 Grant Date  Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(1)
 

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2)

 All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Share of
Stock or
Units(#)(3)
  Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
Awards(4)
  Grant Date  Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(1)
 

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2)

  All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units(#)(3)
 Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock
Awards($)(4)
 
 Target($) Maximum($) Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 Maximum
(#)
  Target($) Maximum($) Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 Maximum
(#)
 

Weston M. Hicks

  1/20/15    1,700,000    2,550,000        1/26/2018  $2,060,000  $3,090,000  4,002  8,004  12,006    $4,767,823 
  2/03/15      4,426    8,852    13,278       $4,026,509  

Joseph P. Brandon

  1/20/15    1,080,000    1,620,000           1/26/2018  1,163,750  1,750,000  2,259  4,517  6,776    2,828,591 
  2/03/15      2,655    5,311    7,967        2,415,815  

Christopher K. Dalrymple

  1/20/15    409,500    614,250        1/26/2018  462,000  690,000  594  1,187  1,781  593  1,114,654 
  2/03/15      697    1,394    2,091        634,089  
  2/03/15                  697    317,044  

Roger B. Gorham

  1/20/15    180,000    270,000       
  2/03/15      298    597    896        271,557  

John L. Sennott, Jr.

  1/20/15    409,500    614,250        1/26/2018  462,000  690,000  594  1,187  1,781  593  1,114,654 
  2/03/15      697    1,394    2,091        634,089  
  2/03/15                  697    317,044  

 

(1)

Reflects awards under the 20102015 MIP. For Messrs. Brandon, Hicks, Dalrymple Gorham and Sennott, target and maximum amounts reflect the range of awards that each such Named Executive Officer could have earned based upon Alleghany achieving a specified financial performance objective, subject to reduction in respect of Alleghany performance and/or individual performance. These amounts are subject to decrease (but not increase) at the discretion of the Compensation Committee based upon its evaluation of Alleghany’s overall financial and operational performance and their individual performance.

 

(2)

Reflects the gross number of shares of common stock payable in connection with awards of performance shares for the 2015-20182018-2021 award period granted under the 20122017 LTIP. Threshold amounts reflect estimated future payout of performance shares if average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share (as defined by the Compensation Committee pursuant to the 20122017 LTIP) equals 5% in the award period; target amounts reflect estimated future payout of performance shares if average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share equals 7% in the award period; and maximum amounts reflect estimated future payout of performance shares if average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share equals or exceeds 9% in the award period. If average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share is less than 5%, none of these performance shares would be payable.

 

(3)

Reflects the awards to each of Mr. Dalrymple and Mr. Sennott under the 20122017 LTIP of restricted stock units that cliff vest on the four-year anniversary of the grant date.

 

(4)

Reflects the 20152018 value of performance share awards for the 2015-20182018-2021 award period under the 20122017 LTIP for the Named Executive Officer, computed in accordance with ASC 718 including adjustments for dividends credited to such awards, assuming payouts at target and shares of restricted common stock or restricted stock units awarded to each of Mr. Dalrymple and Mr. Sennott.

 

-57--61-


Narrative Discussion Relating to the Summary Compensation Table and

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

Change in Pension Value

Effective December 31, 2013, Alleghany’sthe Retirement Plan was closed to new participants and was “frozen” for existing participants so that no additional benefits would accrue after such date. Despite the freezing of the Retirement Plan, the Summary Compensation Table on page 5459 may still show an increase or decrease in the value of our Named Executive Officers’ pension benefits. These changes in value are primarily driven by external variables, such as the discount rate, the mortality tables used and the passage of time. Set out below is a table showing the components of the change in pension value for the years 2013-20152016-2018 for our Named Executive Officers who are participants in the Retirement Plan.

 

Name

  Year   (Increase)
Decrease in
Discount

Rate(1)
 Change in
Mortality
Table(2)
   Passage of
Time/Age
Increase(3)
   Value of
Benefits
Accrued
During the
Year(4)
   Total Change
in Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(5)
   Year   (Increase)
Decrease in
Discount
Rate(1)
 Change in
Mortality
Table(2)
 Passage of
Time/Age
Increase(3)
   Value of
Benefits
Accrued
During the
Year
   Total
Change
in Pension
Value(4)
 

Weston M. Hicks

   2015    $(478,042      $454,163         $(23,879   2018   $(1,050,340 $  $494,208       $(556,132
   2014     1,629,691   $862,795     421,981          2,914,467     2017    1,353,162     491,041        1,844,203 
   2013     (1,618,668       386,857          (1,231,811   2016    490,169  (25,871 481,534        945,832 

Joseph P. Brandon

   2015     (43,777       37,233          (6,544   2018   $(94,884 $  $40,036       $(54,848
   2014     146,869    73,701     33,822          254,392     2017    97,455     40,248        137,703 
   2013     (146,523       13,545    $470,783     337,805     2016    44,939  (2,317 39,282        81,904 

Christopher K. Dalrymple

   2015     (140,953       81,866          (59,087   2018   $(326,704 $  $91,957       $(234,747
   2014     445,079    190,070     67,214          702,363     2017    328,206     88,429        416,635 
   2013     (438,285       52,583     415,409     29,707     2016    145,194  (6,510 84,472        223,156 

Roger B. Gorham

   2015     (69,311  231,910     93,865          256,464  
   2014     274,499         98,672          373,171  
   2013     (282,916       86,783          (196,133

 

(1)

For 2015,2018, the discount rate used was 4.25%4.0%; for 2014,2017, the discount rate used was 4%3.5%; and for 20132016, the discount rate used was 5%4.0%.

 

(2)

For the Retirement Plan year ending in 2013, Alleghany elected to use a mortality assumption based on tables prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service for funding purposes. For the Retirement Plan year ending in 2014,2016, Alleghany elected to change the mortality assumption used to compute the present values for annuities to the RP 2014RP-2014 base table with white collar adjustment and Scale MP -2014,MP-2016, which reflect updated mortality tables issued by the Society of Actuaries in October 2014. For2016. In accordance with the Retirement Plan, year ending in 2015, Alleghany amended the Plan to adjust thissame mortality basis used to compute the present values for lump sums to the RP-2014 Annuitanttable change, using a male/female (50/50) blended basis, applied to the calculation of lump sums. For the Retirement Plan years ending in 2017 and 2018, respectively, Alleghany did not change the mortality table using Scale MP-2014 with generational projection.assumptions.

 

(3)

Represents the change attributable to passage of time and increase in participant’s age.

 

(4)Amounts for each of Mr. Brandon and Mr. Dalrymple reflect additional accruals as their projected full service benefit in the applicable Retirement Plan year was greater than the retirement benefit accrued by him at December 13, 2010 when the Compensation Committee amended the Retirement Plan by eliminating the inclusion of annual cash bonuses earned for years subsequent to 2010 in the computation of benefits. For additional detail in this regard, see pages 65 through 67.

(5)Calculated in accordance with SEC rules governing preparation of the Summary Compensation Table on page 5459 except for Mr.Messrs. Hicks, and Mr. Gorham in 2013 and Mr. Hicks, Mr. Brandon and Mr. Dalrymple in 2015,2018, as SEC rules do not allow for inclusion of negative pension amounts in the Summary Compensation Table.

-58-


In order to show the effect that the year-over-year change in pension value had on total compensation, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 54, and as determined under applicable SEC rules, the table below presents SEC total compensation and then SEC total compensation without pension value changes for the Named Executive Officers who are participants in the Retirement Plan. The amounts reported in the SEC total without pension value changes are calculated by subtracting the change in pension value reported in the Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings columns (but including the nonqualified deferred compensation earnings reported in that column, if any) from the amounts reported in the SEC Total column. The amounts reported in this column may differ substantially from, and are not a substitute for, the amounts reported in the SEC Total column in the Summary Compensation Table on page 54.

Name

  Year   SEC Total
Compensation
   SEC Total
Compensation
without
Change in
Pension Value
 

Mr. Hicks

   2015    $6,892,685    $6,892,685  
   2014     10,543,046     7,628,579  
   2013     7,447,725     7,447,225  

Mr. Brandon

   2015     4,968,531     4,968,531  
   2014     5,165,562     4,911,170  
   2013     4,830,467     4,492,662  

Mr. Dalrymple

   2015     2,299,273     2,299,273  
   2014     2,892,997     2,190,634  
   2013     2,098,832     2,069,125  

Mr. Gorham

   2015     1,498,593     1,242,129  
   2014     1,551,121     1,177,950  
   2013     1,155,184     1,155,184  

Employment Agreement with Weston M. Hicks

On October 7, 2002, Alleghany and Mr. Hicks entered into an employment agreement pursuant to which Mr. Hicks agreed to serve as Executive Vice President of Alleghany. Pursuant to the terms of this employment agreement, Mr. Hicks’s salary is to be reviewed annually. In addition, if Mr. Hicks’s employment is terminated by Alleghany other than for “Cause” or other than in the case of his “Total Disability,” Alleghany will continue to pay his base salary in accordance with Alleghany’s regular payroll practices after such termination until such payments aggregate $1,000,000 on a gross basis. “Cause” is defined as conviction of a felony; willful failure to implement reasonable directives of the Chairman or the Board after written notice, which failure is not corrected

-62-


within ten days following notice thereof; or gross misconduct in connection with the performance of any of Mr. Hicks’s duties. “Total Disability” is defined as Mr. Hicks’s inability to discharge his duties due to physical or mental illness or accident for one or more periods totaling six months during any consecutive twelve-month period. The employment agreement was the result of anarm’s-length negotiation between the Executive Committee of the Board and Mr. Hicks and was approved by the Compensation Committee and the Board. The Executive Committee determined that such provisions were appropriate and helpful in recruiting Mr. Hicks, and the Compensation Committee and the Board approved such determination.

Employment Agreement with Joseph P. Brandon

On November 20, 2011, Alleghany and Mr. Brandon entered into an employment agreement which became effective on March 6, 2012 upon the closing of the TransRe acquisition, under which Mr. Brandon agreed to serve as Executive Vice President of Alleghany. Pursuant to the terms of this employment agreement:

 

Mr. Brandon’s salary is to be reviewed annually for increases but shall not be decreased.

 

-59-


If Mr. Brandon’s employment is terminated by Alleghany other than for “Cause” or other than in the case of his “Total Disability,” Alleghany will continue to pay his base salary in accordance with Alleghany’s regular payroll practices after such termination until such payments aggregate $1,000,000 on a gross basis. “Cause” is defined as conviction of a felony; willful failure to implement reasonable directives of Alleghany’s chief executive officer after written notice, which failure is not corrected within ten days following notice thereof; or willful gross misconduct in connection with the performance of any of Mr. Brandon’s duties. “Total Disability” is defined as Mr. Brandon’s inability to discharge his duties due to physical or mental illness or accident for one or more periods totaling six months during any consecutive twelve-month period.

 

Mr. Brandon and Alleghany entered into a restricted stock unit matching grant agreement dated as of March 6, 2012, whereby Mr. Brandon was to receive a restricted stock unit matching grant under the 2007 LTIP of one restricted stock unit for every share of common stock Mr. Brandon purchased or received pursuant to stock dividends on those purchased shares, or “JPB Owned Shares,” on or before September 3, 2012 up to a maximum of $5.0 million worth of common stock. Material terms of this matching grant agreement, or the “JPB Matching Grant Agreement,” are discussed below.

Mr. Brandon and Alleghany entered into a success shares award agreement dated as of March 6, 2012, pursuant to which Mr. Brandon received an award (i) under the 2007 LTIP of 11,137 fully vested and non-forfeitable shares of common stock and (ii) a lump sum cash payment in the amount of $3.5 million. The transfer restrictions applicable to these shares lapsed on March 6, 2015.

The employment agreement was the result of anarm’s-length negotiation between the Board and Mr. Brandon and was approved by the Compensation Committee and the Board. The Board determined that such provisions were appropriate and helpful in recruiting Mr. Brandon and completing the TransRe acquisition.

2012 Restricted Stock Unit Matching Grant Award to Mr. Brandon

Between March 6, 2012 and September 3, 2012, Mr. Brandon purchased 9,023 shares of common stock and, pursuant to the JPB Matching Grant Agreement, Alleghany credited him with 9,023 restricted stock units. These restricted stock units are notional units of measurement denominated in shares of common stock and entitle Mr. Brandon to payment on account of such restricted stock units in an amount equal to the Fair Market Value, as defined in the JPB Matching Grant Agreement, on the payment date of a number of shares of common stock equal to the number of restricted stock units to which Mr. Brandon is entitled to payment.

Pursuant to the terms of the JPB Matching Grant Agreement, the restricted stock units vest over a seven-year period, with 15% of the restricted stock units vesting on each of the first six anniversaries of the date of grant and 10% of the restricted stock units vesting on the seventh anniversary of the date of grant. The restricted stock units are to be paid in cash and/or shares of common stock, as the Compensation Committee may determine within ten business days of the applicable vesting date. If Mr. Brandon is terminated without Cause or by reason of his death or Total Disability (as such terms are defined in the JPB Matching Grant Agreement), the

-63-


restricted stock units scheduled to vest during such year shall vest on a pro rata basis for the amount of time Mr. Brandon was employed during such year. If Mr. Brandon voluntarily terminates his employment or Alleghany terminates his employment for Cause, all unvested restricted units shall be forfeited. Mr. Brandon has no voting or other rights in respect of the restricted stock units.

Mr. Brandon must maintain unencumbered beneficial ownership of the JPB Owned Shares continuously throughout the period commencing with the initial purchase of JPB Owned Shares and ending on the earliest to occur of (i) March 6, 2019, (ii) Mr. Brandon’s termination of employment for any reason or (iii) a merger approved by the Board effectuated by a tender offer or other major corporate transaction approved by the Board with respect to Alleghany’s common stock. To the extent Mr. Brandon fails to do so, he will forfeit one restricted stock unit for each JPB Owned Share with respect to which he has not maintained unencumbered beneficial ownership for the required period of time.

-60-


Letter Agreement with Mr. Gorham

Effective February 21, 2013, Mr. Gorham and Alleghany entered into a letter agreement which provides for continued payments to Mr. Gorham of his base salary until such payments aggregate to $1.2 million on a gross basis, payable in accordance with Alleghany’s normal payroll and procedures, following termination of his employment other than for Cause or in the event of his death or Total Disability. “Cause” is defined as conviction of a felony, willful failure to implement reasonable directives of Alleghany’s chief executive officer after written notice, which failure is not corrected within ten days following notice thereof, or willful gross misconduct in connection with the performance of any of Mr. Gorham’s duties. “Total Disability” is defined as Mr. Gorham’s inability to discharge his duties due to physical or mental illness or accident for one or more periods totaling six months during any consecutive twelve-month period.

-61-


Outstanding Equity Awards at 20152018 FiscalYear-End

 

  Stock Awards   Stock Awards 

Name

  Number of
Shares or Units

of Stock That
Have Not
Vested(#)
 Market Value of
Shares or Units

of Stock That
Have Not
Vested($)
   Equity Incentive
Plan  Awards: Number of
Unearned Shares,

Units or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested(#)
 Equity Incentive  Plan
Awards: Market or
Payout Value of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested($)
   Number of
Shares or Units
of Stock That
Have Not
Vested(#)
 Market Value of
Shares or Units
of Stock That
Have Not
Vested($)
 Equity Incentive
Plan Awards: Number of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other Rights
That  Have Not
Vested(#)
 Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Market or
Payout Value of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other  Rights
That Have Not
Vested($)
 

Weston M. Hicks

            13,206(1)  $6,356,180          13,493(1)  $8,370,652 
            16,856(2)   8,112,721          12,758(2)  7,914,680 
            15,197,(3)   7,314,227          11,271(3)  6,992,190 
            13,278(4)   6,390,834          12,007(4)  7,448,783 

Joseph P. Brandon

   4,962(5)  $2,388,573     7,442(1)   3,581,668     917  $568,879(5)  8,094(1)  $5,021,275 
            8,990(2)   4,326,736          7,893(2)  4,896,580 
            9,119(3)   4,388,825          6,386(3)  3,961,683 
            7,967(4)   3,834,356          6,776(4)  4,203,627 

Christopher K. Dalrymple

            2,853(1)   1,373,177     708(6)  $439,222  2,125(1)  $1,318,286 
   825(6)   397,081     2,472(2)   1,189,798     691(7)  428,676  2,073(2)  1,286,027 
   759(6)   365,314     2,279(3)   1,096,665     559(8)  346,787  1,679(3)  1,041,601 
   697(6)   335,473     2,091(4)   1,006,419     593(9)  367,879  1,781(4)  1,104,879 

Roger B. Gorham

            3,488(1)   1,678,569  
            989(2)   475,775  
            911(3)   438,233  
            896(4)   431,013  

John L. Sennott, Jr.

            1,593(1)   766,727     708(6)  $439,222  2,125(1)  $1,318,286 
            2,124(2)   1,022,302     691(7)  428,676  2,073(2)  1,286,027 
   759(6)   365,314     2,279(3)   1,096,665     559(8)  346,787  1,679(3)  1,041,601 
   697(6)   335,473     2,091(4)   1,006,419     593(9)  367,879  1,781(4)  1,104,879 

 

(1)Performance shares granted under the 2007 LTIP (the 2012 LTIP for Mr. Sennott), calculated at maximum payout, which vest after completion of the award period ending December 31, 2015.

(2)Performance shares granted under the 2012 LTIP, calculated at maximum payout, which vest after completion of the award period ending December 31, 2016.

(3)Performance shares granted under the 2012 LTIP, calculated at maximum payout, which vest after completion of the award period ending December 31, 2017.

(4)Performance Shares granted under the 2012 LTIP, calculated at maximum payout, which vest after completion of the award period ending December 31, 2018.

(2)

Performance Shares granted under the 2012 LTIP, calculated at maximum payout, which vest after completion of the award period ending December 31, 2019.

(3)

Performance Shares granted under the 2012 LTIP, calculated at maximum payout, which vest after completion of the award period ending December 31, 2020.

(4)

Performance Shares granted under the 2017 LTIP, calculated at maximum payout, which vest after completion of the award period ending December 31, 2021.

 

(5)

Restricted stock units granted under the 2007 LTIP which vest over a seven year period, with 15% vesting on each of the first six anniversaries of date of grant and 10% vesting on the seventh anniversary of the date of grant. The terms of this award are described in more detail on page 60.pages 63 and 64.

 

-64-


(6)

Restricted stock unit awardsaward granted under the 2012 LTIP which cliff vestvests on February 3, 2019, the fourth anniversary of the date of grant.

(7)

Restricted stock unit award granted under the 2012 LTIP which cliff vests on January 15, 2020, the fourth anniversary of the date of grant.

(8)

Restricted stock unit award granted under the 2012 LTIP which cliff vests on February 3, 2021, the fourth anniversary of the date of grant.

(9)

Restricted stock unit award granted under the 2017 LTIP which cliff vests on January 26, 2022, the fourth anniversary of the date of grant.

2018 Stock Vested

 

-62-


2015 Stock Vested

  Stock Awards(1)   Stock Awards(1) 

Name

  Number of  Shares
Acquired on Vesting
   Dollar Value
Realized  on Vesting
   Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
   Dollar Value
Realized on Vesting
 

Weston M. Hicks

   9,996    $4,805,827     12,317   $7,476,049 

Joseph P. Brandon(2)

   6,935     3,312,614     8,765    5,350,820 

Christopher K. Dalrymple

   1,140     548,084     1,846    1,120,466 

Roger B. Gorham

   3,299     1,586,077  

John L. Sennott, Jr.

   1,062     510,583     1,846    1,120,466 

 

(1)

For each of Mr. Hicks, Brandon, Dalrymple Gorham and Sennott, includes the gross amount of performance shares which vested upon certification of performance by the Compensation Committee on February 24, 201521, 2018 with respect to the award period ending December 31, 2014.2017. Payouts of such performance shares were made at 150%121.58% of target. The gross number of performance shares vested, and the form of payment, were as follows: Mr. Hicks, 9,99612,317 shares with a dollar value of $4,805,827$7,476,049 (paid in cash); Mr. Brandon, 5,5827,390 shares with a dollar value of $2,683,686$5,350,820 (paid in the form of 1,349 shares of common stock and $2,035,121 in cash); Mr. Dalrymple, 1,1401,846 shares with a dollar value of $548,084$1,120,467 (paid in the form of 505752 shares of common stock and $305,292$664,025 in cash); and Mr. Gorham, 3,299Sennott, 1,846 shares with a dollar value of $1,586,077 (paid in cash); and Mr. Sennott, 1,062 shares with a dollar value of $510,583$1,120,467 (paid in the form of 635954 shares of common stock and $205,291$541,417 in cash).

 

(2)

Includes 1,3531,375 restricted stock units which vested on September 2, 20153, 2018 pursuant to the JPB Matching Grant Agreement. The dollar value of such restricted stock units was $628,928 (paid in the form of 654 shares of common stock and $303,904 in cash). The terms of this award are described in more detail on page 60.pages 63 and 64.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

 

Name

  Executive
Contributions
in Last

Fiscal Year
   Registrant
Contributions
in Last

Fiscal Year(1)
   Aggregate
Earnings
in Last
Fiscal Year
(2)
   Aggregate
Withdrawals/

Distributions
 Aggregate
Balance at Last
Fiscal Year-End
   Executive
Contributions
in Last
Fiscal Year
   Registrant
Contributions
in Last
Fiscal Year(1)
   Aggregate
Earnings
in Last
Fiscal Year(2)
 Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
 Aggregate
Balance at Last
Fiscal Year-End
 

Weston M. Hicks

       $150,000    $106,940    $(3,525 $2,780,352        $154,313   $(52,850 $(3,627 $3,627,574 

Joseph P. Brandon

        120,000     14,372     (2,819  528,321         131,094    42,816  (3,081 993,724 

Christopher K. Dalrymple

        94,313     30,198     (2,217  896,487         103,375    19,473  (2,429 1,311,590 

Roger B. Gorham

   115,000     90,000     33,940     (4,818  1,227,474  

John L. Sennott, Jr.

        94,313     5,280     (2,216  254,527         103,375    33,886  (2,429 656,616 

 

(1)

Such amounts are included as a component of “All Other Compensation” for 20152018 set forth in the Summary Compensation Table on page 5459 and discussed in Note (5) to the Summary Compensation Table.

 

(2)

Amounts represent interest earned on amounts credited to savings benefit accounts during 2015.2018. Such amounts are not included in the Summary Compensation Table on page 5459 as these amounts are not considered to be above-market interest.

-65-


The Deferred Compensation Plan, which was established in January 1982 and amended and restated in December 2014, provides for unfunded deferred compensation arrangements for Alleghany officers and certain other employees. The following descriptions of “Savings Benefit Provisions” and “Compensation Deferral Provisions” of the Deferred Compensation Plan generally apply to amounts that were earned and vested under the Deferred Compensation Plan after December 31, 2004. Amounts earned and vested before January 1, 2005, or the “Pre-409A“Pre-409A Benefits,” are subject to less stringent requirements concerning the time of payment of benefits under the Deferred Compensation Plan, but the substantive provisions that apply to thePre-409A Benefits are generally the same as described below.

-63-


Savings Benefit Provisions

All officers, including our Named Executive Officers, are eligible to participate in the Deferred Compensation Plan on the date of election or appointment as an officer of Alleghany.

Under the Deferred Compensation Plan, each calendar quarter, we credit a book reserve account for each officer who is a participant at any time during such quarter with an amount equal to 3.75% of the officer’s base annual salary. This quarterly credit results in an annual credit of 15% of a participant’s base annual salary, which we refer to as the “Savings Benefit Credit.” Each participant may elect to have those amounts either credited with:

 

interest at the prime rate (theor, the “Prime Rate Alternative”);Alternative;”

 

treated as though invested in common stock, (theor the “Common Stock Alternative”);Alternative;” or

 

increased or decreased by an amount proportionate to the growth or decline of Alleghany stockholders’ equity per share, (theor the “Stockholders’ Equity Alternative”).Alternative.”

In general, payment of these amounts is made or commences on the date elected by the participant, which may not be later than 12 months following termination of employment, either in a lump sum or in installments as elected by the participant.

If a participant chooses the Prime Rate Alternative, that interest is computed from the date the Savings Benefit Credit is credited until the date that the amount is distributed to the participant or the date that the participant elects the Common Stock Alternative or the Stockholders’ Equity Alternative. The “prime rate” for purposes of the Deferred Compensation Plan means the rate of interest announced by JPMorgan Chase Bank as its prime rate at the close of the last business day of each month, which rate is deemed to remain in effect through the last business day of the next month.

Amounts treated as invested in common stock reflect the investment experience which the account would have had if the amounts had been invested, without commissions or other transaction expenses, and held in whole or fractional shares of common stock during the deferral period. These amounts are adjusted as appropriate to reflect cash and stock dividends, stock splits, and other similar distributions or transactions which, from time to time, occur with respect to common stock. Dividends and other distributions are automatically credited at their cash value or the fair market value of anynon-cash dividend or other distribution and are deemed to purchase common stock on the date of payment thereof. Common stock is deemed acquired, and is valued for purposes of payout or transfer, at a price per share equal to the mean between the high and low prices thereof on the applicable date on the NYSE Consolidated Tape. A participant’s ability to elect to have his or her Savings Benefit Credit amounts treated as invested (or not invested) in our common stock is subject to compliance with applicable securities laws.

With respect to 2015,2018, Mr. Hicks elected the Stockholders’ Equity Alternative to apply to his Savings Benefit Credit; Mr. Brandon and Mr. Gorham elected to have the Prime Rate Alternative apply to theirhis Savings Benefit Credit; Mr. Sennott elected the Common Stock Alternative to apply to his Savings Benefit Credit; and Mr. Dalrymple elected to have the Stockholders’ Equity Alternative apply to 50% of his Savings Benefit Credit and to have the Prime Rate Alternative apply to 50% of his Savings Benefit Credit.

-66-


Compensation Deferral Provisions

The Deferred Compensation Plan provides that participants may elect to defer all or part of their base salary and annual incentive compensation each year other than compensation that would be paid in the form of common stock. Thus, currently, no long-term incentive compensation payable pursuant to the 20072012 LTIP or 20122017 LTIP may be deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan. Amounts deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan are credited with interest at the prime rate, unless a participant elects the Common Stock Alternative or the Stockholders’ Equity Alternative. A participant’s decision to have deferred amounts treated as invested (or not invested) in common stock is also subject to compliance with applicable securities laws.

-64-


Pension Benefits

 

Name

  

Plan Name

  Number of
Years of
Credited
Service
   Present Value of
Accumulated
Benefit(1)
 Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year
   

Plan Name

 Number of
Years of
Credited
Service
for Benefit
Accrual
 Present Value of
Accumulated
Benefit(1)
 Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year
 

Weston M. Hicks

  Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan   11    $11,330,203        Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan 11  $13,564,106    

Joseph P. Brandon

  Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan   2     924,285        Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan 2  1,089,044    

Christopher K. Dalrymple

  Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan   12     1,987,563   ��    Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan 12  2,392,607    

Roger B. Gorham

  Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan   9     2,603,084      

John L. Sennott, Jr.

  Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan        (2)       Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan    (2)    

 

(1)

Reflects the estimated present value of the retirement benefit accumulated under the Retirement Plan as of December 31, 20152018 by the Named Executive Officers, based in part on (i) their years of credited service as of such date,December 31, 2013, as indicated in the table, and (ii) the Named Executive Officers’ average compensation as of December 31, 2013 as determined under the Retirement Plan, which was $2,425,000 for Mr. Hicks, $1,000,000 for Mr. Brandon $995,075 for Mr. Gorham and $459,167 for Mr. Dalrymple. The actuarial assumptions used to compute the present values for annuities are a discount rate of 4.25%4.00% and theRP-2014 Annuitantssex-distinct tables usingwith white collar adjustment and Scale MP-2014MP-2016 with generational projection. The actuarial assumptions used to compute the present values for lump sums are a discount rate of 4.25%4.00% forpre-retirement interest, a30-year U.S. treasury rate of 4.00% for post-retirement interest and theRP-2014 Annuitant male/female (50/50) blended basis mortality table usingwith white collar adjustment and Scale MP-2014MP-2016 with generational projection.

 

(2)

Mr. Sennott commenced employment on April 16, 2013. In light of the expected amendment to the Retirement Plan which occurred in July 2013 and was effective December 31, 2013, the Board did not designate Mr. Sennott as a participant in the Retirement Plan.

The Retirement Plan provides retirement benefits for our employees who are elected officers and who are designated as participants by the Board, including the Named Executive Officers. On July 16, 2013, the Board approved an amendment to the Retirement Plan effective December 31, 2013, whereby the Retirement Plan was closed to new participants and no additional benefit accruals would occur for existing participants after such date. Pursuant to this amendment, base compensation and future years of service are not taken into account when calculating a participant’s retirement benefits. However, future years of service with Alleghany by any participant who was not vested in his or her accrued benefit as of the freeze date will continue to have such service credited toward the Retirement Plan’s five-year vesting requirement. Furthermore, such future years of service will count towards early retirement eligibility and early retirement benefits determination for all participants. On November 17, 2015, the Board approved an amendment, or the “Plan Amendment,” to the Retirement Plan effective December 31, 2015. The Plan Amendment provides for the automatic adjustment of the mortality table used to make certain calculations in the Retirement Plan, in order to reflect revised mortality projections determined by Alleghany in accordance with applicable accounting guidance.

-67-


Retirement benefits are paid, following termination of employment, in the form of an annuity for the joint lives of a participant and his or her spouse or, alternatively, actuarially equivalent forms of benefits, including a lump sum. Prior to January 1, 2011, the annual retirement benefit under the Retirement Plan, if paid in the form of a joint and survivor life annuity to a married participant who retires on reaching age 65 with 15 or more years of service, was equal to 67% of the participant’s highest average annual base salary and annual cash bonus over a consecutive three-year period during the last ten years or, if shorter, the full calendar years of employment. On December 13, 2010, pursuant to authority delegated by the Board, the Compensation Committee amended the Retirement Plan, effective January 1, 2011, by eliminating the inclusion of annual cash bonuses earned for years

-65-


subsequent to 2010 in the computation of benefits. As amended, the annual retirement benefit would be the greater of (i) the retirement benefit accrued by the participant at December 31, 2010, based upon eligibility for vesting and years of service credited at such date, pursuant to the benefit formula in effect at December 31, 2010, or (ii) a full service retirement benefit, if paid in the form of a joint and survivor annuity to a married participant who retires on reaching age 65 based upon years of service credited at December 31, 2013, equal to 67% of the participant’s highest average annual base salary over a consecutive three-year period during the ten years ending December 31, 2013 or, if shorter, the full calendar years of employment. The retirement benefit payable to a participant who retires on reaching age 65 with more than five but fewer than 15 years of service will equal the amount produced by the formula set forth in clause (ii) of the preceding sentence multiplied by a fraction the numerator of which is the number of the participant’s years of service at December 31, 2013 and the denominator of which is 15, or, if greater, the retirement benefit accrued at December 31, 2010.

For purposes of the formula, base salary is the amount that would be included in the salary column of the Summary Compensation Table for the relevant years. For computations involving years when annual cash bonuses are included in the formula for determining the amount of the retirement benefit, the cash bonus is the amount of the cash bonus earned under the 2005 MIP or predecessor plan or any other annual incentive bonus plan or discretionary annual award that would be included in either the Bonus orNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table as earned in respect of the relevant years. The Retirement Plan’s benefit formula contains a factor which will reduce a married participant’s benefit payments to the extent that a participant is older than his or her spouse.

If a participant becomes totally disabled prior to retirement, then for the period of total disability the participant is treated as earning annual base salary in an amount which is equal to his or her annual base salary at the time of disability, with such base salary amount adjusted annually for inflation. Further, a participant’s period of disability will be treated as continued employment for all purposes under the Retirement Plan, including for purposes of determining his or her years of service.

A participant who has terminated employment may start to receive benefits under the Retirement Plan as early as age 55, but the benefit payable at that time will be reduced to reflect the commencement of benefit payments prior to Normal Retirement Age, which is defined as age 65 with 15 years of service. A participant who terminated employment with us after reaching age 55 and completing at least 20 years of service, or after reaching age 60 and completing at least 10 years of service, will have a smaller reduction (a reduction equal to 3% of his or her accrued benefit) than a participant who terminated employment prior to reaching such age or completing such number of years of service (a reduction equal to 6% of his or her accrued benefit), and therefore has a subsidized early retirement benefit. The benefit payable to a participant who retires after Normal Retirement Age is increased to the greater of (i) the benefit taking into account additional years of service, salary increases and (for years prior to 2011) bonuses paid through the actual date of retirement or (ii) the benefit that is actuarially equivalent to the lump sum that would have been payable at Normal Retirement Age, such lump sum increased with interest to reflect the passage of time since Normal Retirement Age. For all purposes of the Retirement Plan, a participant’s years of service are the number of years, including a fraction thereof, included in the period which starts on the date he or she becomes a participant, and which ends on the date his or her employment with us terminates.

-68-


As of December 31, 2015,2018, Mr. Hicks was age 5962 and had 1316 years of credited service (for the purpose of early retirement qualification), thus he could have retired and begun to receive a retirement benefit as of that date. If Mr. Hicks had retired on December 31, 2015,2018, the present value of his early retirement benefit would have been $10,155,457.$14,557,346. As of December 31, 2015, Messrs.2018, Mr. Brandon was age 59 and had 6 years of credited service (for the purpose of early retirement qualification), thus he could have retired and begun to receive a retirement benefit as of that date. If Mr. Brandon had retired on December 31, 2018, the present value of his early retirement benefit would have been $1,003,751. As of December 31, 2018, Mr. Dalrymple and Gorham werewas under age 55, thus neither of themhe would not have been eligible to receive a subsidized early retirement benefit if he had retired as of that date. If Mr. Dalrymple and Mr. Gorham had retired on December 31, 2015,2018, the present value of theirhis retirement benefits assuming commencement at theirhis earliest retirement datesdate and reflecting theirhis benefit elections under Section 409A of the Code would have been $1,368,849 for Mr. Dalrymple and $1,870,396 for Mr. Gorham. Mr. Brandon would not have been entitled to any retirement benefit if he had retired as of December 31, 2015 because he would not

-66-


have had five years of service.$1,620,843. As noted above, in anticipation of the closing of the Retirement Plan to new participants effective December 31, 2013, the Board did not designate Mr. Sennott as a participant in the Retirement Plan.

Payments Upon Termination Ofof Employment

The table below provides information regarding the amounts that Messrs. Hicks, Brandon, Dalrymple, Gorham and Sennott would be eligible to receive upon any termination of employment by Alleghany other than for “Cause,” if such termination of employment occurred on December 31, 2015:2018:

 

Name

 Severance
under
Employment
Agreement(1)
 Payments under
Restricted
Stock

Unit Matching
Grant Award(2)
 Acceleration
of Payment

of Awards
under

2007 and
2012 LTIP(3)
 Acceleration
of Payment
of Awards
under

2010
MIP(4)
 Retirement
Plan(5)
 Deferred
Compensation
Plan(6)
 Total  Severance
under
Employment
Agreement(1)
 Payments under
Restricted
Stock
Unit Matching
Grant Award(2)
 Acceleration
of Payment
of Awards
under
LTIP(3)
 Acceleration
of Payment
of Awards
under
2015
MIP(4)
 Retirement
Plan(5)
 Deferred
Compensation
Plan(6)
 Total 

Weston M. Hicks

 $1,000,000       $16,803,489   $1,700,000   $10,155,457   $2,780,352   $32,439,298   $1,000,000     $12,901,990  $2,163,000  $14,557,346  $3,627,574  $34,249,910 

Joseph P. Brandon

  1,000,000   $1,545,851    9,444,510    1,620,000        528,321    14,138,682   1,000,000  $568,879  7,693,674  1,750,000  1,003,751  993,724  13,010,028 

Christopher K. Dalrymple

          2,924,984    614,250    1,368,849    896,487    5,804,570         2,020,235  690,000  1,620,843  1,311,590  5,642,668 

Roger B. Gorham

  1,200,000        2,302,107    270,000    1,870,396    1,227,474    6,869,977  

John L. Sennott, Jr.

  ���        2,192,912    614,250        254,527    3,061,689         2,020,235  690,000     656,616  3,366,851 

 

(1)

These amounts would be paid by Alleghany upon termination other than for Cause, death or Total Disability (as such terms are defined in the respective employment agreements) in the form of continued payments of base salary in accordance with our normal payroll and procedures.

 

(2)

Reflects award amount payable to Mr. Brandon under his restricted stock unit matching grant award agreementthe JPB Matching Grant Agreement if Mr. Brandon was terminated without Cause or by reason of his death or Total Disability (as such terms are defined in such matching agreement). The terms of this restricted stock unit matching agreementthe JPB Matching Grant Agreement are described on page 60.pages 63 and 64.

 

(3)

Reflects payment on a pro rata basis of all outstanding LTIP awards under the 2012 and 2017 LTIPs, including amounts paid in February 20162019 for the award period ending December 31, 2015, based on the elapsed portion of the award period prior to termination and average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share through the date of termination, in accordance with the terms of the awards.2018.

 

(4)

Reflects annual incentive earned in respect of 20152018 under the 20102015 MIP. These amounts, earned in respect of 20152018 performance, were paid to the Named Executive Officers in February 20162019 as reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 5459 and as described on pages 49 and 50.51 through 54.

 

(5)

Reflects payment of vested pension benefits, computed as of December 31, 2015,2018, under the Retirement Plan to Messrs. Hicks, DalrympleBrandon and Gorham. Mr. Brandon was not vested in the Retirement Plan as of December 31, 2015 andDalrymple. Mr. Sennott is not a participant in the Retirement Plan. The determination of these pension benefits is described in more detail on pages 6567 through 67.69. This amount does not include retiree life insurance death benefit, equal to the annual salary of a participant at the date of retirement, payable to our Named Executive Officers.

 

(6)

Reflects the aggregate vested account balance at December 31, 20152018 of each Named Executive Officer’s savings benefit (consisting of Alleghany contributions and interest earned thereon) under the Deferred Compensation Plan.

-69-


Certain of our Named Executive Officers would be entitled to payments in the event of the termination of their employment. These payments, other than those that do not discriminate in scope, terms or operation in favor of the Named Executive Officers and that are generally available to all salaried employees, are described below.

-67-


Pursuant to their employment agreements with Alleghany, Messrs.Mr. Hicks and Mr. Brandon would be each entitled to receive continued payments of his base salary until such payments aggregate $1.0 million on a gross basis, payable in accordance with our normal payroll and procedures, following termination of his employment other than for Cause or in the event of his death or Total Disability. As described in more detail on page 60,pages 63 and 64, the JPB Matching Grant Agreement provides for a pro rata payment in the event of the termination of employment without Cause or termination of employment by reason of Mr. Brandon’s death or Total Disability. In February 2013, Mr. Gorham and Alleghany entered into a letter agreement which provides for continued payments to Mr. Gorham of his base salary until such payments aggregate $1.2 million on a gross basis, payable in accordance with our normal payroll and procedures, following termination of his employment other than for Cause or in the event of his death or Total Disability. The foregoing agreements generally define “Cause” to mean conviction of a felony; willful failure to implement reasonable directives of the Chairman or the Board, as well as Alleghany’s chief executive officer in Mr. Brandon and Gorham’s cases,Brandon’s case, after written notice, which failure is not corrected within ten days following notice thereof; or gross misconduct in connection with the performance of any of their duties. “Total Disability” in the foregoing agreements generally is defined to mean inability to discharge duties due to physical or mental illness or accident for one or more periods totaling six months during any consecutive twelve-month period.

Other than the foregoing, there are no individual arrangements that would provide payments to our Named Executive Officers upon termination other than for cause or in the event of death or disability. We do not have any arrangements with our Named Executive Officers that would provide for payments upon a change of control of Alleghany or upon a change of control and subsequent termination of employment; although Mr. Brandon’s restricted stock unit matching agreementthe JPB Matching Grant Agreement does provide that hisMr. Brandon’s holding requirement for JPB Owned Shares will lapse upon a change of control.

A number of the plans described in this Proxy Statement have provisions that may result in payments upon termination of employment under certain circumstances as described below.

20072012 LTIP and 20122017 LTIP

Awards under our 20072012 LTIP and 20122017 LTIP provide for the pro rata payment of outstanding awards in the event of the termination of employment prior to the end of the award period. With respect to awards under the 20072012 LTIP and 20122017 LTIP, the pro rata payment would be based on the elapsed portion of the award period prior to termination and average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share through the December 31st immediately prior to date of termination, as determined by the Compensation Committee.

2010 MIP and 2015 MIP

Our 2010 MIP and 2015 MIP also provideprovides that, in the event of a participant’s death or disability prior to the end of the award period for an outstanding award, the participant (or in the event of the participant’s death, the participant’s beneficiary) shall receive such portion of the award, if any, as determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion. If the employment of a participant who has received a qualifying award is otherwise terminated during an award period, the participant shall not be entitled to receive any payment for such award unless the performance goals applicable to such award are achieved and certified by the Compensation Committee, in which case the Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, may determine that the participant shall be entitled to receive all or any part of the qualifying award that would be payable to the participant upon the achievement of those performance goals. Pursuant to the 2015 MIP, if a participant who has received anon-qualifying award terminates employment for any reason (other than death or disability), the Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, may determine that the participant is entitled to receive payment of all or any part of thenon-qualifying award.

 

-68--70-


Retirement Plan and Deferred Compensation Plan

Additional payments upon any termination of employment would be made under our Retirement Plan, as long as the employee is eligible to receive benefits under the Retirement Plan at the time of the termination of employment. Our Deferred Compensation Plan also provides for payments of a participant’s vested savings benefit in the event of any termination of employment in the form previously elected by a participant subject to the provisions of Section 409A of the Code, as applicable, or if no election has been made, in a lump sum. Termination of employment will not cause an enhanced payment or other benefit to be made under the Deferred Compensation Plan. Information with respect to the Retirement Plan is set forth on pages 6567 through 67,69, and information with respect to the Deferred Compensation Plan is set forth on pages 6366 and 64.67.

CEO Pay Ratio

We are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our median employee and the annual total compensation of our chief executive officer. For 2018, our last completed fiscal year:

the annual total compensation of our median employee of all employees of our company (other than our chief executive officer) was $61,805; and

the annual total compensation of our chief executive officer was $9,056,352.

Based on this information for 2018, we reasonably estimate that the ratio of our chief executive officer’s annual total compensation to the annual total compensation of our median employee was 147:1. Our pay ratio estimate has been calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K using the data and assumptions summarized below.

To identify our median employee, we first determined our employee population as of December 31, 2018, or the “Determination Date.” We had 5,305 employees, representing all full-time, part-time, seasonal and temporary employees, including our chief executive officer, as of the Determination Date. This number does not include any independent contractors or “leased” workers, as permitted by the applicable SEC rules. Our employee population excludes approximately 4,520 employees in Concord and approximately 805 employees in Hirschfeld Industries, both of which we acquired in 2018.

Using our payroll records, we then measured the employee population’s taxable income for the period beginning on January 1, 2018 and ending on December 31, 2018. We did not annualize the compensation for employees in temporary or seasonal positions or make any full-time equivalent adjustments. For our employees who were paid in currency other than U.S. dollars, these amounts were converted into U.S. dollars at the applicable exchange rate for 2018.

Once we identified our median employee, we then determined that employee’s total compensation, including any perquisites and other benefits, in the same manner that we determine the total compensation of our Named Executive Officers for purposes of the Summary Compensation Table disclosed above. For 2018, the total compensation of our median employee was determined to be $61,805. For 2018, the total compensation of our chief executive officer was $9,056,352. Based on the foregoing, the total compensation amount for our median employee was compared to that of our chief executive officer to determine the pay ratio.

 

-69--71-


The SEC rules for identifying the median employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. As such, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates, and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.

-72-


STOCKHOLDER NOMINATIONS AND PROPOSALS

Alleghany’s TheBy-Laws, which are available on Alleghany’s website at www.alleghany.com, require that Alleghany be furnished with written notice with respect to:

 

the nomination of a person for election as a director, other than a person nominated by or at the direction of the Board; and

 

the submission of a proposal, other than a proposal submitted by or at the direction of the Board, at a meeting of stockholders.

In order for any such nomination or submission to be proper, the notice must contain certain information concerning the nominating or proposing stockholder and the nominee or the proposal, as the case may be, and must be furnished to Alleghany generally not less than 30 days prior to the meeting.

In accordance with SEC Rule14a-8, in order for any proposal of a stockholder to be considered for inclusion in Alleghany’s notice of meeting, proxy statement and proxy relating to the 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, scheduled for Friday, April 28, 2017,24, 2020, the proposal must be received by the Secretary of Alleghany by November 18, 2016.

16, 2019.

 

-70--73-


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

At any time prior to their being voted, proxies are revocable by written notice to the Secretary of Alleghany at Alleghany’s principal executive offices, submitting a new proper proxy dated later than the date of the revoked proxy, or by appearance at the 20162019 Annual Meeting and voting in person. A quorum comprising the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Alleghany’s common stock on the record date must be present in person or represented by proxy for the transaction of business at the 20162019 Annual Meeting.

Solicitation of proxies will be made by mail, courier, telephone, facsimile ore-mail and, to the extent necessary, by personal interviews. Alleghany will bear the expenses in connection with the solicitation of proxies. Brokers, custodians and fiduciaries will be requested to transmit proxy material to the beneficial owners of common stock held of record by such persons at Alleghany’s expense. Alleghany has retained Georgeson Shareholder Communications Inc. to aid in the solicitation of proxies, and for its services Alleghany expects to pay fees of approximately $9,500 plus expenses.

 

-71--74-


ALLEGHANY CORPORATION

LOGO

IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION  

 

 

 

 

Using ablack ink pen, mark your votes with anX as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.   x  

LOGO

 

Electronic Voting InstructionsYour vote matters – here’s how to vote!

 

Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!

InsteadYou may vote online or by phone instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the two voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy.this card.

LOGOLOGO

Votes submitted electronically must be

received by 1:00 am (Eastern Daylight

Time) on April 26, 2019.

LOGO  

 

Vote by Internet

Online

•  Go towww.envisionreports.com/YAL.

www.investorvote.com/YAL

•  Oror scan the QR code with your smartphone.— login details are
located in the shaded bar below.

•  Follow the steps outlined on the secure website.

LOGO  

 

Vote by telephone

Phone

•  Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within
the USA, US territories &and Canada any time on a touch tone telephone. There isNO CHARGE to you for the call.

LOGO  

•  Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message.

 

VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.

Save paper, time and money!

Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on April 22, 2016.Sign up for electronic delivery at

www.investorvote.com/YAL

 

LOGO

 

Alleghany Corporation Annual Meeting Proxy Card

qIF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.  q

q  IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.  q

 

 

 

 A  Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR all the listed nominees andFOR Proposals 2 and 3.

1.Election of Directors
ForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstain+
1a - Karen Brenner¨¨¨   1b - John G. Foos¨¨¨
    +
1. Election of Directors:ForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstain      For AgainstAbstain

     01 - Karen Brenner

  

 

For

 

 

Against

 

 

Abstain

 
2.

    

Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Ratification of selection of Ernst & Young LLP as Alleghany Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2016. 02 - John G. Foos

¨¨¨
  

 

 03 - Lauren M. Tyler    

       

 

For

 

 

Against

 

 

Abstain

 
3.

2.Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm:Ratification of selection of Ernst & Young LLP as Alleghany Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2019.

 

Say-on-Pay

For

Against

Abstain

3. Say-on-Pay:Advisory vote to approve the compensation of the named executive officers of Alleghany Corporation.

 ¨ ¨ ¨ 

 

 B  Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted — Datecount. Please date and Sign Below.sign below.

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below.

 

Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box.

Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.

Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below.  Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box.Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.
       /        /               

IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOUMUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A - C ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD.

01ZNTCLOGO


 

Important Notice Regarding Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for the

Alleghany Corporation 20162019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on April 22, 2016.26, 2019.

OurThe proxy materials relating to our Annual Meeting (Notice of Meeting, Proxy Statement, Proxy and 20152018 Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K) are also available on the Internet. Please go to www.envisionreports.com/YAL to view and obtain proxy materials online.

For comments and/or address changes, please send an email to info2@alleghany.com or call 1.888.752.1356.

LOGO

Small steps make an impact.

Help the environment by consenting to receive electronic

delivery, sign up atwww.investorvote.com/YAL

LOGO

 

q  IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION,

q  IF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.  q

 

 

+

 

PROXY — ALLEGHANY CORPORATION

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ALLEGHANY CORPORATION FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON APRIL 22, 2016

The undersigned hereby appoints Jefferson W. Kirby, Weston M. Hicks and Christopher K. Dalrymple proxies, each with the power to appoint his substitute and with authority in each to act in absence of the other, to represent and to vote all shares of stock of Alleghany Corporation which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Alleghany Corporation to be held at The Penn Club of New York, 30 West 44th Street, New York, New York, on Friday, April 22, 2016 at 10:00 a.m., local time, and any adjournments thereof, as indicated on the proposals described in the    Proxy Statement, and all other matters properly coming before the meeting.

WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN. IF NO SUCH DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

IMPORTANT Alleghany Corporation

  + 

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ALLEGHANY CORPORATION FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON APRIL 26, 2019.

The undersigned hereby appoints Jefferson W. Kirby, Weston M. Hicks and Christopher K. Dalrymple proxies, each with the power to appoint his substitute and with authority in each to act in absence of the other, to represent and to vote all shares of stock of Alleghany Corporation which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Alleghany Corporation to be held at The Penn Club, 30 West 44th Street, New York, New York, on Friday, April 26, 2019 at 10:00 a.m., local time, and any adjournments thereof, as indicated on the proposals described in the Proxy Statement, and all other matters properly coming before the meeting.

WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN. IF NO SUCH DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

IMPORTANT – THIS PROXY MUST BE SIGNED AND DATED ON THE REVERSE SIDE.

 

 C Non-Voting Items

Change of Address

Change of Address—Please print new address below.

 

    

 

¢ IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A - C ON BOTH  SIDES OF THIS CARD. 

+